dark light

mack8

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 646 through 660 (of 2,087 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: KPAF discussion thread #2305827
    mack8
    Participant

    There is a thread only a year old on the same subject
    http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?t=113880

    in reply to: Pak-Fa News Thread part 22 #2306106
    mack8
    Participant

    Hey sport , why don’t you spare us the trouble and stop talking about something you pretty much have no idea on, let the PAK-FA talking to the folks who actually know a thing or two about it, will you ? If you don’t even know what engine PAK-FA is using now, and you come here to post some articles from F-16.net (?)and other unreliable sources, why do you bother? Just read , you might learn something. Meanwhile, go cheerlead your “wonderful” LM and do your nationalistic crap somewhere else, thanks.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2013 #2306296
    mack8
    Participant

    F-15SA first flight Feb 20th.
    http://www.wpafb.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123339926

    Is this the first F-15 with FBW then ? Any more pics?
    PS: Nvm, high-rez pic here. Does it have a MAWS?
    http://www.wpafb.af.mil/shared/media/photodb/photos/2013/03/130220-F-VC230-001.jpg

    in reply to: Dumb or what? #2306298
    mack8
    Participant

    A thread made by and for your stereotypical China hate-mongers, judging by some replies here…:mad: Anyway, if this deal will be pursued i’m looking forward to it, China will get a valuable boost to it’s defence capabilities until the indigenous 5th gens start coming in numbers, while the russian aeronautical industry gets a welcome boost through such an order. Everybody wins (except the China/Russia haters of course).

    Oh and i’m pretty sure the chinese-russian military technology relationship it’s much more honest and pragmatic than what some hate mongers portray it to be (the copy stuff and other uninformed rubbish). Strangely, i don’t think i’ve heard any “copying ” complaints from any relevant russian officials, can anyone prove me wrong?

    in reply to: Saudi F-15C – Peace Sun VI #2306510
    mack8
    Participant

    Speaking of saudi F-15s, does anyone know if the first saudi F-15SA had it’s first flight yet, and are there more pics of it ? Thanks.

    …PW F100-229A (with 165KN!)…

    Where did you got that thrust figure from ?:confused: The figure (for 232 btw, 229A renamed) is 145KN.

    in reply to: F-35 debate thread. #2306867
    mack8
    Participant

    Yeah, they killed far more civillians that serbian soldiers. They started destroying the civilian infrastructure (bridges, power plants etc.) in a deliberate manner to “kneel” the serbians. They only got a handful of tanks and APCs and some SAMs. Most of them survived, and shot at the americans &co until the last day of the war.

    in reply to: Algerian Air Force-pictures and discussion #2306955
    mack8
    Participant

    This is great stuff, closer than ever before footage of an Algerian MiG-25PD! ๐Ÿ˜ฎ
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=g23P7pRO2S0#!

    in reply to: Pak-Fa News Thread part 22 #2306961
    mack8
    Participant

    Is that the first time we’ve seen an external pylon on T50 ???

    …. or did I miss the memo ???

    Ken

    Well, there was a picture of 053 from i think couple of months back (or more ?) showing these same pylons.

    Btw, does anyone knows what is the status of 054? Did it started flying from LII yet? I have read “something” about 054 and 051 on paralay.com few days ago , but the translation didn’t made any sense…perhaps they flew together, or something like that? :confused:

    in reply to: Which attack helicopter for Iraq? #2310677
    mack8
    Participant

    So i’m reading they’ve apparently passed a defence budget of 17 billion $. At first sight it’s an impressive figure , but some say mostly it’s for personnel. What are we talking about here, on what personnel are they going to spend most of that money on?

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 11 #2310775
    mack8
    Participant

    Not only that, look closer. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Ok i give up, what else? I can see the two small antennas under the wingtips like the indian UPG, but i can’t notice anything else. (oh and the GLITs badge)

    in reply to: Which attack helicopter for Iraq? #2312023
    mack8
    Participant

    Iraq may vote tomorow to pass the 2013 budget. they are on a knife edge with votes.

    So as i understand it the budget didn’t passed is it ? What will happen now? :confused:

    in reply to: F-35 debate thread. #2312035
    mack8
    Participant

    Speaking of (LM) paycheckees… :rolleyes:

    http://www.offiziere.ch/?p=11420

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 11 #2312080
    mack8
    Participant

    Some nice shots from LII ๐Ÿ™‚
    K/KUB
    http://russianplanes.net/id100117
    http://russianplanes.net/id100071
    http://russianplanes.net/id100066

    9-53 testing the Super Fulcrum’s CHFL dispensers.
    http://russianplanes.net/id100111

    in reply to: F-35 debate thread. #2312083
    mack8
    Participant

    http://i619.photobucket.com/albums/tt271/SpudmanWP/Misc/hum234_zpsb50e7ccf.gif

    OMG, I never would have guessed that a Block 1A F-35A would have restrictions placed upon it due to flight testing not being done. :rolleyes:

    On the engine issue, keep in mind that these are initial training flights and 52 hours by 4-6 hours a week is one change every 2-3 monthsโ€ฆ..

    That’s it, just a one liner? Where is the usual half page of “facts” and figures to “show” that actually everything is absolutely fine with the bestest and the goodest aircraft evah made, from the bestest and goodest and most fairest and corruptionless company evah! Come on general, gotta work a bit harder to earn that Lockh…that paycheck eh ? :D:D:D

    mack8
    Participant

    The premise of the thread is wrong,

    Actually, not really, since the topic of this thread is a hypothetical one, it’s up to the participants to imagine scenarios that lead to the what-if in question, isn’t that how it works?

    In fact, the premise of this topic is not even out of the realm of reality, you could say the invasion of Kuwait and subsequent war with the americans &co, stemmed from a roughly similar scenario as the 1967 war. You could say the cassus belli was that the iraqis claimed historical rights over Kuwait and decided to invade because (insert your reason here- like they felt threatened by surrounding states or whatever ), but then they misinterpreted the US reaction etc etc.

    Anyway, imo the bottom line is a better trained, better equipped and better lead iraqi military in 1991, ignoring any other considerents ( political etc.) would probably launch a preemptive strike against the saudis and the eventual US&co buildup, with some rather interesting results at least as far as the air combat side is concerned. (for further details, see “Iraqi fighter aces of the Great Gulf War” :D)

Viewing 15 posts - 646 through 660 (of 2,087 total)