dark light

mack8

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 886 through 900 (of 2,087 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: North Korea successfully launches long-range rocket #1791138
    mack8
    Participant

    You really want to get with me into this kind of discussion SpudmanWP? YOU talk about starving ? Well apparently your fellow countrymen are something like a third or more FAT. As in obese. As in eating too much. Also your fellow countrymen waste phenomenal amounts of food, mind boggling quantities aparently. Yet your same country REFUSES to give even some symbolic aid to the North Koreans, because according to some the “finer” examples of your countrymen on the net, “they only give it to the military, we don’t feed our enemies, hurrah!”. Boy, sending some damn cans of food in NK is like sending them weapons or something!

    They are subjected to all kinds of embargos of every imaginable type, instigated or enforced by USA. North Koreans starve because of that. Did your all powerful no 1 superpower country made any honest effort to actually negociate in a reasonable way with North Korea? What is the US Governments idea of peace, “oh, all you have to do is have your leadership hanged as human rights abusers and we send occupation troops in your country and install a puppet government, and there will be peace” ? Should i start about Cuba ? Or Iran? The propaganda offensive against China? Or others? You have grown surrounded by a certain type of society (racism and xenophobia are at it’s pillars in my opinion) and propaganda and you probably believe into all that “America f**yeah !” stuff, but the real world out there , and the real facts , are rather different than in your propaganda. And you know , when you see all the world wide hostility and scathing criticism towards your country (and that include western Europeans, btw), and it’s “self-appointed policeman of the world” actions, perhaps it’s not that there’s something wrong with all those (communists lovers , socialists or whatever you call them) peoples around the world, but there something seriously wrong with YOUR country. But i don’t expect your fellow countrymen (or most of them anyway) to accept that.

    Like i was saying, if peace is wanted, it can be achieved in the Korean peninsula (and anywhere else ). But it’s more useful for the US that the North Koreans starve, so that the leadership is increasingly more ruthless so that US can say “oh look at the “wacky” North Koreans, come on buy our sh*t and have our troops in your country, we will protect you!!! “. A never ending circle.

    Anyway , sorry for the rant , mods my humblest apologies. Some things just need to be said. 🙁

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2274765
    mack8
    Participant

    Is that file by AndyUA available online somewhere? 🙂 Thanks.

    in reply to: North Korea successfully launches long-range rocket #1791142
    mack8
    Participant

    Says who? American propaganda? No thanks. There CAN be peace in the korean peninsula, and there CAN be a better life for the North Koreans, but they are more “useful” for the american geostrategical interests being “wacky” as you say. God forbid a semblance of relative peace between the Koreas, what excuse will they use to base their military in South Korea and elsewhere then? Or those tens and hundreds of billions of weapons sales to “protect” against this huge “menace” ? No, peace is no good for bussiness eh? 😡

    in reply to: North Korea successfully launches long-range rocket #1791145
    mack8
    Participant

    So how come the yanks are allowed to launch how many missiles into space as they want, but NK is not. (including stuff like that X-37, i thought militarization of space is not permitted under various treaties). So much foaming and badmouthing for a bloody satellite. Hypocrites.:mad:

    in reply to: Aerodynamic question #2274779
    mack8
    Participant

    Fly by wire?

    in reply to: F35 debate thread- enter at your own risk. #2274781
    mack8
    Participant

    I don’t know that 1,6 Mach is sufficent to counter PAK-FA class air superiority stealth fighters in the future BVR combat ? Maybe MBDA Meteor will fill the gap between superior kinematics , but when the F-35 got AIM-120D , and PAK-FA got RVV-SD , I think that energy could play the roles – who can shoot first, and which shoot will be more lethal in BVR.
    I think that future PAK-FA will have as good speed and alt as current F-22A – so can go ~ 2 Mach and 60k ft alt , and than turn away with 7G( don’t forgot about supersonic turn ability here), anyway it is rather huge advantage in BVR when both has got same BVRAAMs range, similar EW,radar, EOS, VLO technology. If You have more energy and better supersonic performance ( turn ) – You reduced NEZ of enemy AAMs and prolong own AAMS range . That’s why F-22 will be better air superiority fighter than F-35.
    F-22 pilots stay most of the time at high alt (page 3):

    http://www.f22-raptor.com/media/documents
    /aviation_week_010807.pdf

    Remember that PAK-FA will be main F-35 opponents in the future market after 2020. So F-35 should be design to challenge the best fighters, as it will be the only US export 5th gen fighter…
    I will put my money on PAK-FA – equivalent of the F-22 in the air combat (and I think that IAF thinks similar , as LM gives them chance to choose F-35s ).

    Allegedly PAK-FA will have more advanced missiles than RVV-SD (actually that’s the export name of the Izd-170-1 missile). Their IOC is planned to coincide with PAK-FA serial deliveries i believe.

    AIM-9X-class, AIM-120D-class, Meteor-class and long range (like MiG-31’s R-37) missiles will apparently be available.

    Perhaps RVV-MD and SD will go with initial export deliveries, and even they are not to be trifled with in any case.

    http://s2.forumimage.ru/uploads/20091228/12619986859059511.jpg

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 21 #2275013
    mack8
    Participant

    From Sukhoi:

    http://sukhoi.org/news/company/?id=5021

    About 200 flights to date.

    Good work KnAAPO and Sukhoi, hope they will release some pics of the bird soon.:)

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2275087
    mack8
    Participant

    You got them by bort number, Berkut? Is there a place where all the latest RuAF upgrades and/ or deliveries are centralized (like which borts, where , when, how many etc.)? Thanks.:)

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2275200
    mack8
    Participant

    6 upgraded MiG-31BM delivered to Krasnoyarsk AB. Total for BM now is about 30, say the folks at paralay.com 🙂

    http://ria.ru/defense_safety/20121211/914254305.html

    in reply to: F35 debate thread- enter at your own risk. #2275469
    mack8
    Participant

    It is up to the purchasing country to determine the best way to provide the capabilities they need. If air policing, airshows and fly-bys during national holidays are the primary needs, then F-35 might not be the best candidate.

    Problem is, many times it’s not up to them. US political pressure and corporate lobbying often leads to “decisions” that are not exactly the best.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2275478
    mack8
    Participant

    Oh and if you go on the RAC MIG website , looks like they started updating their site with recent news. Kudos, it was long overdue. There are some interesting pdf articles there, like this one.
    http://www.migavia.ru/info/Return_of_MiG.pdf

    RAC MiG website:
    http://www.migavia.ru/news/?tid=4

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread – 19 #2275493
    mack8
    Participant

    First 3 MiG-29UPG re-delivered to India:

    http://www.uacrussia.ru/ru/press/news/index.php?id4=1007

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2275497
    mack8
    Participant

    New Hellduck(s) in testing, thanks Vyacheslav.:)

    http://russianplanes.net/images/to94000/093144.jpg
    http://russianplanes.net/images/to94000/093143.jpg

    in reply to: Algerian Air Force-pictures and discussion #2275553
    mack8
    Participant

    MiG-27? Umm…the closest to that are the pics of AAF’s MiG-23BN. (MiG-27 was never exported except to India, and small numbers of second-hand ones to Sri Lanka i think)

    in reply to: Algerian Air Force-pictures and discussion #2275771
    mack8
    Participant

    Great stuff, thanks Fulcrum and Nino.:)

Viewing 15 posts - 886 through 900 (of 2,087 total)