dark light

mack8

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 901 through 915 (of 2,087 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2275931
    mack8
    Participant

    Su-30SM again, courtesy of Djoker 🙂

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OysfxsPr0Y&feature=player_embedded

    in reply to: F35 debate thread- enter at your own risk. #2276086
    mack8
    Participant

    How is the DoD’s decision to go from a 110 per year plan to a 80 per year plan? This loss of Economy of Scale had a huge affect on the annual price of the F-35A.

    This is just one example of how the DoD directly effected the price of the F-35 negatively.

    Because LM was asking more than an arm and a leg for every subsequent lot! (i really don’t want to start looking for the prices of the first lots, but everyone knows it was a LOT, and much more than expected- i’m sure you have the figures in front of you as you are so intimate with this program). How many times LM asked for more money for the program BEFORE the US DoD started reducing it’s orders? How much behind and problematic (which required more money to solve ) was the program BEFORE the DoD reduced it’s orders?

    If you want to blame concurrency again, why LM said they can do it? Even so, you know very well that LM’s design quality even in the initial stages of the program was absymal, remember the thing being 1500lb (or was it more) overweight, right ? IOC 2010, 2011 and 2012 for each version, remember those promises? Or the (very hilarious now) 65 millions per copy? They changed that now though, was it you who said F-35 will start costing 65 millions (yeah right) after the first EIGHT HUNDRED(!) are built, but until then, one has to pay through his bleeding nose for every F-35 (especially challenging for the small “allies” hand-twisted into buying it).

    There are some rather stinky issues with this program (and we probably only see the tip of the iceberg), and i’m not saying the above just because i loath you yanks (:p) and want to rain on you parade, anyone with half a brain can see there are some major issues with the F-35. (which can only make yankee loathers like me go lol, to be honest with you :D)

    in reply to: F35 debate thread- enter at your own risk. #2276240
    mack8
    Participant

    Embedded including in the “classified” aspects of the programme? These “partner nations” have access to ALL the F-35 data right? You know they don’t. The fact that they are “embedded” does not mean they’re being shown everything.

    in reply to: F35 debate thread- enter at your own risk. #2276264
    mack8
    Participant

    All these potential F-35 buyers are allowed to see only what LM and the US government wants them to see. Which is the bestest and the goodest possible graphs and statistics etc.

    Besides, like i was saying, political pressure/blackmail has a big part in the “selection” of the F-35. (hell aparently LM plays the same game internally).

    in reply to: F35 debate thread- enter at your own risk. #2276422
    mack8
    Participant

    You can bet there’s a furious amount of backstage action going on, i’m sure the canadians are subjected to all kinds of promises, threats and blackmail to not cancel the F-35 buy.

    in reply to: SAAF Turbo Dak missing over Drakensberg #2276516
    mack8
    Participant

    RIP to all lost in this tragedy. Amazing they kept this Dakota going for 68 years.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2276552
    mack8
    Participant

    New built for one of the export customers? Who’s having Su-30MK’s from KnAAPO on order at this time btw? Vietnam?

    in reply to: J-20 Thread 7 #2276561
    mack8
    Participant

    Like i was saying in another place, someone is getting payed big money to write that utter and total crap, and some are ( unfortunately) paying money to read it! ( dunno how much a JDW issue costs these days)

    Amazing. How can one give any credibility to anything they write after rubbish like this. Who knows what else they invented.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2276581
    mack8
    Participant

    It seems to have to do with the stabilator position when there’s no hydraulic pressure in the system. Perhaps it’s just expediency, they probably need to power up the thing and move the stabilator to paint that little area too…

    in reply to: A new strike aircraft in development at Groom Lake? #2276636
    mack8
    Participant

    And by the way, I have some very reliable information that something akin to “Aurora” was flying around the UK in the early 1990s.

    Are you serious or just joking? If you actually mean it, do you know how that thing looks like from your sources? 😮

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2276639
    mack8
    Participant

    Right, is that Mr. Bogdan in 06 ?:p

    Great stuff, thanks Flateric (especially for the rar upload). Is the unpainted one part of the 05-07 borts to be delivered, or is it part of the subsequent lot?

    in reply to: F-22 News and debate thread #2276817
    mack8
    Participant

    It would be really, really interesting to see how upgraded legacy Fulcrums, like the RMAF MiG-29N (N-019M and RVV-AE), fare against western aircraft, just to compare them against baseline MiG-29s.

    Surely the likes of MiG-29S/SM/SMT can hold their own well against any contemporary technology western fighters (i’m not talking about F-22s here of course).

    Some were using the example of ICE phantoms vs legacy MiG-29s to show that even an F-4 has superior SA, conveniently ignoring the fact that the damn things have been UPGRADED with APG-65, AMRAAM and modern RWR and other gear! I wonder if they ever held drills of legacy Phantoms versus the MiG-29s. Would be surprised if the F-4Fs would even knew what hit them.

    Were there any exercises between RMAF Su-30MKMs and USN Super Hornets fitted with APG-79? That would another very interesting one to dissect.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2276993
    mack8
    Participant
    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2277020
    mack8
    Participant

    Indeed, would be good news for RuAF (and fanboys lol). How many Hellducks are at Voronezh at this time?

    in reply to: Serbian Air Force has started lookig in to new fighters #2277279
    mack8
    Participant

    Don’t sweat over it DJ, the net is full of such washouts…you get used to it. I bet some folks who talk so confidently about Serbia (or any other “third” country) can even find it on a map.

    Buk-M2 indeed makes more sense because of the country’s size. S-300PMU would still be awesome though.:rolleyes:

Viewing 15 posts - 901 through 915 (of 2,087 total)