dark light

mack8

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 931 through 945 (of 2,087 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The take-off aircraft carriers. #2280206
    mack8
    Participant

    Well yes and no! They got the T-10K-3 prototype from the Ukraine which is markedly different in certain areas to the SU-33 production variant, in particular lack of cannards.

    Lacking what? Where did you got that info ? Look closer at that damn picture. 😉

    in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 16 #2280363
    mack8
    Participant

    Right, so the pilot actually made a perfect trap. Case closed.:)

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2280367
    mack8
    Participant

    Is it just me or does it seem like this batch will sport the same scheme as the recently shown Su-30SMs? Look at the closing seconds of this:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PnsJSx5xQA8
    Bort 06, gray!

    Oh god, Berkut is going to kill someone. :p

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2280376
    mack8
    Participant

    Pictures please, pictures!:p

    So , if they are suposed to deliver 6 Su-35S’s to VVS this year , does that mean that the odd one out is black 01, right ? (it has non standard fittings, no antennas or chaff/flare launchers on tail boom for instance)

    VVS will receive red 02,03,04, 05-07 , right ?

    in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 16 #2280394
    mack8
    Participant

    Wow. This is a historic moment for China . Congratulations.:)

    (to the above question, i think the third wire class as “stellar” , if i’m not mistaken)

    in reply to: F35 debate thread- enter at your own risk. #2280541
    mack8
    Participant

    Let’s see the score so far…..
    1. F-35 can’t Supercruise.. and then it does
    2. F-35 can’t go above 20 AoA… and then it demonstrates 50 AoA
    3. F-35 is not LO… and then it exceeds spec
    4. F-35 can’t go beyond m1… and then it hits m1.66
    5. F-35 is not maneuverable… and then it hits 9.9g
    6. EODAS is short range only… and then it tracks a rocket launch from over 800 miles away
    7. The helmet problems cannot be fixed… and then they are
    8. F-35 can’t catch the wire… and then it does

    You do realize that you’re taking the absolute best figures LM can boast about in in public, which are rather not representative for what the aircraft can do in real life. Pulling 9,9 G is NOT an indicative of how maneuverable it is , tracking an IRBM in perfect clear sky UP TO about 800miles is completely irrelevant in the real world (far more relevant is at what distance can it see another fighter or a SAM) , and going M1.2 without AB is something pretty much most recent fighters can. Most importantly all the above with good and bad comes and a hideous cost, PLUS more hideous costs with actually making the thing work roughly as advertised. Still keep with the $65m price?

    I just realized that LM slogan ” We never forget who we are working for ” fits them perfectly. The answer is their pockets , of course!

    I have the feeling this will turn into another F-104 story (corruption , scandals, lackuster performance). And you know why is the F-35 not on time , not on budget and not on goal? Because of greed. If we’ll be still around in a decade or so , you’ll see.:)

    PS: I for one can only welcome such a turn of events btw, the more scandals, unmet goals and unmet schedules, that much time the “russkies” and the “chicoms” have time to just lay low and work hard to get their respective birds up and running and especially ON SALE.:D

    in reply to: F-22 News and debate thread #2280587
    mack8
    Participant

    can the Su-30 do every maneuver like those Operationally? can it do all of this with 8 AAMS? if it cannot then the argument is moot either way.
    Beesly is a veteran test pilot. Ill take his word over yours.

    Can the F-22 do every maneuver like those operationally? (no i don’t believe the ” but F-22 always perform in a combat representative configuration at airshows , full internal load and fuel!!11!!111!!!!” blah-blah-blah :))

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 21 #2280589
    mack8
    Participant

    Um…i think i’ve read that article ( Super Flanker or something like that) , probably there’s some confusion, you’re probably mixing 710 ( Su-35/27M engine testbed) with bort 503 which indeed is Su-30(MKK type), used for radar testing.
    710 , summer 2012
    http://russianplanes.net/id81603
    503 , spring 2012
    http://russianplanes.net/id70127

    in reply to: F35 debate thread- enter at your own risk. #2280595
    mack8
    Participant

    You cannot outmaneuver a modern WVR missile. Your only chance of survival is not to get shot at or kill the other guy first.

    In the fifties and 60s, short range missiles were usually less maneuverable than their fighter targets. So they made missiles maneuverable , but then there was flares. So then they made them all-aspect and immune to flares, so now they have DIRCM.:)

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 21 #2280604
    mack8
    Participant

    Actually , yes bort 710 is a legacy Su-35 (Su-27M). But that’s a small detail.:)

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 21 #2280648
    mack8
    Participant
    in reply to: Tank's active protection #2280862
    mack8
    Participant

    While an interesting topic in itself , this is not really a tank forum , is it ? You’re probably better asking your questions on a land systems orientated forum imo. 🙂

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2280865
    mack8
    Participant

    4 of those 6 Su-35S’ are flying around already and are painted ;), and they have superb scheme.

    I was in great mood today but when i saw this scheme i just wanted to stab kittens. In the face.

    Still do.:)

    Enjoy:

    http://vif2ne.ru/nvk/forum/files/Nikolski/%28121122154121%29_IMG_4320.JPG

    Interesting , a sort of confirmation of their training orientated role. Looks like it has some sort of curtain for blind/reduced visibility training in the front cockpit (don’t remember seeing that on any “combat” Su-30 MKI-types).

    in reply to: Current Russian AF Bases #2280888
    mack8
    Participant

    Would be great if you can do that Berkut.:)

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2280955
    mack8
    Participant

    Oh well, colour is not everything… Say, you think they’re gonna paint the 6 Su-35S that are to be delivered before year-end the same ?:eek: (please Berkut, calm down and don’t hurt anyone, it’s alright we’ll get used to it :p)

Viewing 15 posts - 931 through 945 (of 2,087 total)