dark light

Rlangham

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 2,541 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: WW1 Treasures at RAFM Reserve Collection #1205983
    Rlangham
    Participant

    Here’s my explanation for ‘maternity jacket’, copy and pasted from another forum

    Apparently it looks like the sort of jacket pregnant women used to wear – i’ve never seen one before myself so wouldn’t know! They are very nice jackets though (the RFC ones that is), currently waiting to hear back about having one made for myself

    To add to that, they did have an official name (can’t remember it now), maternity jacket was a nickname which stuck, like the ‘gor blimey’ cap worn by the rest of the Army, so nicknamed because apparently a Sergeant who saw it when they first arrived at the front/depot etc said ‘Gor’blimey!’

    in reply to: WW1 Treasures at RAFM Reserve Collection #1206124
    Rlangham
    Participant

    Yep, this is Stafford Roger.

    As for the RAF in WW1, I presume it was the same as the Women’s Auxiliary Army Corps, the RFC branch of which became the WRAF – married women were allowed, however only if their husband was on another front (so you would be alright if based in the UK and husband was in France, or in France if your husband was in Italy/Salonika etc)

    I do have a few other photos, but I was mostly there for the WW1 stuff, will try and add more later.

    Cheers, Rob

    in reply to: Bomber Boys #1206289
    Rlangham
    Participant

    I’ve read one, but I don’t know which! Wish I knew as I want to read the other one. The cover art is very similar too on both so that doesn’t help

    in reply to: Percival Proctor – put your photos here #1206293
    Rlangham
    Participant

    Taken at Stafford today

    http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk256/RobLangham/c2-3.jpg

    in reply to: A few Cosford photos #1206787
    Rlangham
    Participant

    Not to mention they fact they don’t even have enough seats, so I had to stand whilst eating my lunch!

    The Opel was used by British Intelligence and fitted with cameras, armour, etc, it was used in the Cold War for travelling on a road (in east Berlin I believe) on which the British were allowed to travel, so these cars were used to photograph Russian military vehicles etc

    in reply to: Halfpenny Green Wings and Wheels April 13 2009 #487257
    Rlangham
    Participant

    No problem there, i’ll have my student loan next time!

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1207126
    Rlangham
    Participant

    Looking at the article, it doesn’t look like there’s any new problems, it’s just mentioning the previous money problems and stating the fact that the first flights will be delayed for this year. Probably just another slow day in Leicestershire (like most days then!)

    in reply to: Lewis gun identification/plans etc #1208894
    Rlangham
    Participant

    John, I think i’ve figured out the mystery behind the Bristol’s Lewis and why it has the Norman Vane sight. A photo in the book ‘Pi in the Sky’ which shows the top Lewis installation (and is probably what the museum’s example was based on) has it with the Norman Vane sight. Presuming it’s not easily removeable, it would still be there as Lewis’s with the forward muzzle clip were used on the Scarff ring too, although they didn’t need them, with the Norman Vane sight and the large aiming ring.

    This means that the Lewis’s would have been interchangeable with either the Scarff ring or the top Lewis installation (which at least two other 22 Sqn Bristol’s had), which of course makes sense because if you go to the armoury and they didn’t have a Lewis available without the Norman Vane/forward clip, you could be stuck without a Lewis!

    Rlangham
    Participant

    Which hangar doors? The Claude Grahame-White Hangar ones? They have been opened before, so yes

    in reply to: 22 Squadron 1918 riddles #1211353
    Rlangham
    Participant

    The following was posted on The Aerodrome;

    On 2 April 1918, 2nd Lt Ernest David Jones and 2nd Lt Robert Francis Newton, No 52 Sqn, were shot down and killed in RE8 A3868, the 75th victory credited to Manfred von Richthofen. The date of the deaths of these two has also been recorded as 3 April – most likely the result of being reported late in the day. Why they shoud have been reported as an F2b crew is a bit of a mystery.

    So it appears the author spelt Jones’ name wrong, and for some bizarre reason managed to confuse an RE8 of 52 Squadron with a Bristol of 22. Certainly worrying about information in the rest of the book

    in reply to: 22 Squadron 1918 riddles #1211376
    Rlangham
    Participant

    Interesting, thanks – however neither of the two books mention any other Squadrons or British aircraft being involved in the fight, and the Osprey book specifically mentions they were Biff crews

    in reply to: 22 Squadron 1918 riddles #1211520
    Rlangham
    Participant

    The Osprey book mentions them as 2 Lt ED James and 2 Lt RF Newton.

    Cheers, Rob

    in reply to: Lewis gun identification/plans etc #1212778
    Rlangham
    Participant

    Thanks for that, would you be able to scan them or copy them when you get the book and letters back? I’d be very interested in seeing them.

    Interesting about the Savage – the rear gun on Hendon’s Bristol is a Savage, thought it looked weird until I got up close to it

    in reply to: Sidcot Suit #1212787
    Rlangham
    Participant

    I don’t suppose anyone knows when the type of Sidcot in use in WW1 stopped being produced do they?

    in reply to: Lewis gun identification/plans etc #1213099
    Rlangham
    Participant

    Thanks John, i’ll have to look out for that book, although have a feeling I already have it back in Leeds. Don’t recall seeing the bit about removing the Lewis guns, they seem to have been very useful and the top Lewis even gets a line in one of the 22 Squadron songs

Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 2,541 total)