dark light

flateric

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 692 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2370958
    flateric
    Participant

    FLATERIC so canopy of t-50-2 is the DEFENITE canopy of serial PAK FA ?:cool:

    what? don’t like it?

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2370965
    flateric
    Participant

    Flateric can you tell us about what you mentioned at paralay forum? Are there one more secret PAK-FA prototype or a different type:confused:

    by secret I mean a reason of 50-1 fligh tests break

    And when will the sukhoi start show?:D

    waiting as much as you do. rumors that before end of November. surely much pressure from tops to fly at least one PAV before the end of the year

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2370973
    flateric
    Participant

    interestingly the X-35 had a two piece framed canopy then switched to a single piece frameless on the F-35]

    because X-35 was a prototype with many off-the-shelf stuff built with economy in mind

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2371406
    flateric
    Participant

    it’s frameless on F-35. transparency is seamless, and just has support bow inside and has nothing common in design to MiG-21F-13 except way of opening of course

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2371424
    flateric
    Participant

    I think the PAK-FA will have a new HMD.

    I know it will. It was announced officially a couple of years ago…

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2371427
    flateric
    Participant

    wrong statement to assume that the T-50 will not have a frameless canopy

    it’s correct statement. bow here to stay. T-50 transparency is silica glass, not acrylic/polycarbonate, due to temperature stress limits, and was never intended to be single-piece as it allows to save weight and add strength
    ‘articles’ you are referencing to is actually a description of R&D codenamed ‘Ashug’ and it only tell of frameless canopy transparency, not canopy+windshield combo (easily calculated while compared transparency size mentioned in Ashug description, to size of T-50 canopy).
    that was already achieved at T50-2
    like designers of B-2, F-117A, F-23A, Sukhoi designers went for framed canopy

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2372345
    flateric
    Participant

    Sukhoi constantly thinks of T-50 nuts. So, if 50-4 will fly right after 50-3, you won’t have enough time to discuss 50-3. They working on it;)

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2373730
    flateric
    Participant

    Bogdan was at controls today

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2374410
    flateric
    Participant

    Parts of Reply Ajai Shukla (Indian journo and former Tankman) gave in his Broadsword blog on the F 35 for India issue.

    Mr.Shukla seems to be Indian variant of Dr.Copp, but reverse variant.
    Looking forward to learn sad truth about PAK FA and FGFA programs.
    Even know what fact probably will leak and introduced as sensation.
    And of course MAKS flameout will be mentioned too.
    I could expect even more, but not sure if he knows words flutter and buffeting though.

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2374792
    flateric
    Participant

    i was refering if those probes will be deleted.

    nose boom? turn on your logic

    also i would like to see one piece canopy 😀

    sci-fi and fanart is in other department store

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2374823
    flateric
    Participant

    does anyone expect physical changes in t-50-3 ??

    you asking this for third or fourth time. what do you mean under ‘physical changes?”
    50-3 will receive operational radome, and I guess additional EOS sensors
    if you expect changes in airframe external shapes – there you are wrong

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2374945
    flateric
    Participant
    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2375121
    flateric
    Participant

    I believe that internal fuel tanks are non-existing entity

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2375138
    flateric
    Participant

    tanks that would be put in w-bays in stand of weapons ?????????

    yes, instead of weapons…:rolleyes:

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2375141
    flateric
    Participant

    You signed the obligation about nondisclosure? : Rolleyes:

    oh, it was 20 years ago – even before I went to MAI:D
    I think it’s expired and stinks

Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 692 total)