dark light

flateric

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 496 through 510 (of 692 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2375501
    flateric
    Participant

    But I found it and thought I’d post the coordinates for anyone that wants to see it:
    55.570833N, 38.146389E
    The Su-47 is now seen in the latest imagery, dated 9/24/10.

    it’s rare find indeed, but 55.570833N, 38.146389E takes me right at 2nd Kirova street at Zhukovsky (it’s even outside LII territory)
    Checked down to south from old truly 1.44 – no sign of Berkut.

    Can you make a screenshot of Su-47 and surrounding area?

    in reply to: Der Pak-Fa Episode 17, return of the stealth #2375522
    flateric
    Participant

    It isn’t.

    Tell that to Sukhoi and KnAAPO staff. You can start right at next Farnborough.
    Once someone tried to tell grOOmi that T-10K (Su-33) was just mod to T-10S.
    His reaction was fierce.
    Su-35S is far more different departure from T-10S than Su-33.

    in reply to: Der Pak-Fa Episode 17, return of the stealth #2375568
    flateric
    Participant

    Maybe it has great aerodynamics but what about electronics, weapons and engines? And there are many unreturned questions about the situation at T-50-2?

    you expect Sukhoi employees to discuss specific problems regarding delays with T-50-2? me not

    Wonder any update (or reliable info) about how many prototypes will be joined to the flight test program?

    four more (if we tend to believe Pogosyan)
    but T-50-3 will not fly this year

    Then if the T-50 flight test program is going very well then is it enough one prototype for getting all the flight parameters at such a program? Then the last question is the program going according the schedule?

    of course not / obviously not

    in reply to: Der Pak-Fa Episode 17, return of the stealth #2375574
    flateric
    Participant

    Needless to say that Su-35S was only a mod to Su-27/Su-27M

    needless to say that this is very common delusion

    in reply to: Der Pak-Fa Episode 17, return of the stealth #2375786
    flateric
    Participant

    Maybe just pass through not a real demonstration. It is too early to do high maneuver.

    Seems that you not tracking news about test flight program at LII and still think that T-50 fly forth and back straight&level over airfield.

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 5 #2375875
    flateric
    Participant

    just to note, moving DSI inlet lips back and forth (as I saw on some fan-art suggestions here) will not do job of making ‘ajustable DSI’

    in reply to: Der Pak-Fa Episode 17, return of the stealth #2375881
    flateric
    Participant

    and by which complicated way did you came from the statement that two Su-35s will be shown at MAKS – one at static exposition, and one for the flight program – to conclusion that T-50 will not be shown this year?

    in reply to: Der Pak-Fa Episode 17, return of the stealth #2375887
    flateric
    Participant

    One question: was it confirmed that T-50 will be shown at MAKS? Or it was just talk?

    why official MAKS web-site says of T-50 to be part of flight program?
    http://s39.radikal.ru/i085/1107/5c/c6685df7985e.jpg
    wonder why all media is filled with banners and ads talking of ‘MAKS – always a premier” and T-50 silhouette shown for 2011?
    http://i014.radikal.ru/1107/61/d44c73e518a0t.jpghttp://i075.radikal.ru/1107/98/77a36d1fc322t.jpghttp://s016.radikal.ru/i335/1107/11/55054096a9ect.jpg

    http://s004.radikal.ru/i205/1107/7f/dc85ad60e2a1t.jpg
    http://i064.radikal.ru/1107/ad/0005b436328dt.jpg
    http://s53.radikal.ru/i140/1107/52/c7b095f40664t.jpg

    http://s61.radikal.ru/i171/1107/6e/8ded013cd813.jpg

    It is, that they now stated that two Su-35 will be exhibited at the show.

    who are ‘they’?

    in reply to: Der Pak-Fa Episode 17, return of the stealth #2375940
    flateric
    Participant

    For the sake of progress.
    Could be the T-50-1 is flying with some restriction

    I’d say, ‘restriction’ is not the term one can apply to last batch of T-50-1 flights. Flight time and complication of flight program was just growing up and up, with tailslides, etc.

    in reply to: Der Pak-Fa Episode 17, return of the stealth #2375990
    flateric
    Participant

    If they have descovered some bugs/snags on the stuctural level,

    … then T-50-1 wasn’t flying the same time as T-50-2 is serving as hangar queen

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 5 #2377224
    flateric
    Participant

    if it was not the YF-22

    this is not YF-22 model. even if you are not an S.H., you can clearly find many differences

    http://i002.radikal.ru/1107/07/fda044f57e12t.jpghttp://s55.radikal.ru/i147/1107/6b/777bfa426008t.jpg
    http://s001.radikal.ru/i196/1107/4a/87772bbfbc19t.jpg

    in reply to: Der Pak-Fa Episode 17, return of the stealth #2377391
    flateric
    Participant

    Was that a financial report? If so, was it revealed how much money has been ‘injected’ into it?

    surely. ‘right here, right now’
    it’s not your US DoD budget releases. slightly other country we live in.

    in reply to: Der Pak-Fa Episode 17, return of the stealth #2377457
    flateric
    Participant

    I clearly remember that a few months after the first flight of the T-50-1 a senior manager of the NPO Saturn has called that they shipped the second batch of “117” engines for the second prototype!

    nice point. still a mystery what Chepkin was talking about when he mentioned Type 30 as ‘tested on T-50’

    meantime, Article 129 leaked again in Saturn yearly report

    in reply to: Der Pak-Fa Episode 17, return of the stealth #2377815
    flateric
    Participant

    many big shrimps – not forum ones – were talking of early or mid June as flight date. obviously some bugs, obviously specific to this PAV (glitches with mysterious ‘Type 30’ that probably installed on her? one can guess)

    those who saw unexpectedly long half-of-an-hour pushing envelope on T-50-1 at the end of June in skies over LII, will not agree to anyone who blackmailed about ‘critical structural problems’

    in reply to: Der Pak-Fa Episode 17, return of the stealth #2377822
    flateric
    Participant

    So where is it? :confused::)

    using Vladimir Vladimirovich’s style, ‘She’s at Ramenskoye’

Viewing 15 posts - 496 through 510 (of 692 total)