Hi Flood
Hi Flood,
It would take a long time to get into the on going debate. May I suggest that you go to warbird resource group and go to the discussion board and look up all of mine and other threads you might understand.
As for the second part of your question, well thats the million dollar question that not even the US Navy can give a reason for.
Like I said in earlier post the Navy is set on going after the Warbird Community they seem hell bent in going after anyone who has planes. I know that if they win this case they plan on going after the CAF or Yank Air Museum to get their SB2C.
Remember the Smithsonion just took back all their planes on loan to the USNAM this means the SB2C they had is now on display in DC.They also are looking at alot of the early Navy aircraft that are now on the Warbird scene this includes at least three USN aircraft that are in the UK the F7F, FG-1D and F6F.
Also if the Navy starts looking into the Lend Lease stuff. If I was FAA Museum I would damn well make sure the Corsair and Hellcat that are on display. Also the AD-4 AEW that is in Storage.
On Friday I plan on Filing a FOIA to get US Navy reports and internal records on this subject.
As I stated this is a War that we can’nt lose.
Flood I hope this helps alittle if you wish I can send you some more items off line.
Cheers
Glyn, they are all ready………
Hi Glyn,
They have all ready set to go after the CAF as soon as their done with Lex. they want the SB2C they have also their are a # of aircraft that are out their that have un-certain early ownership problems that they want.
As for Lex know what he got himself into, weel he talk with the Navy and as I said in an earlier post the Navy did’nt give a Rats-Tushy.
It use to be real easy to deal with the Navy if you found something you gave them a call talk witht hem and if they did’nt want it then they gave you the OK, it was’nt till the present leadership at Washington Naval History Center and down at Pen. came in then things went South.
As for calling on boycott of Navy aircraft at Airshows its one of the Best PR things you can do. Let me but in this context. Say Reno and Oshkosh both cancel all Navy apperances and then go and have a Live Press Conferance covered by all the Bigies. The first qeustion thats going to be ask is why and the responce is that because of the Navys position towards the Warbird owners.
Then you go on to explain the USAF and US Army positions and how easy it is to deal with these Museums. That gets the press to start asking the Navy alot of hard questions, at the same time you talk about the TBD off Florida the PBM thast they wreck in Lk Washington you get where I’m going here the only way you can fight this to make the public call for changes.
Also by getting a petion started at Airshows going on thru-out the US you reach out to close to 50 million people if you can get just 1% to sign and turn these over to major Media outlets then that can be there helpful.
Remeber they started this War when they went after the guys up in Lake washington in the mid-80s, and believe me this is a War if we don’t win then this gives the Navy a free hand in going after anyone. they still believe that any aircraft that served in the Navy is theirs.
Cheers Rob
STRIKE
Yes their is, In the court ruling on the Lk. Washington aircraft the Federal Judge ask the Navy Lawyer does the word STRIKE mean that the USN gives up ownership and are declaring said aircraft displosed of.
The Navy lawyers answer was yes that the Navy concider STRIKE aircraft no longer their property. The Judge then ask for a clear statement from Washington on this and they replied stating that if they have too clean up or recover all STRIKE site aircraft that they could not and are giving up ownership claims to all said STRIKE aircraft.
This case is public record and we have someone in the Seattle area getting the whole case including the ruling and the appeals that the Navy also lost.
Cheers