dark light

over G

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,501 through 1,515 (of 1,640 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RSK MiG 5th Generation fighter- Huge #2651811
    over G
    Participant

    well about the engines, the klimov team will use an r33 class evolution??, maybe they dont like the idea of an new signle engine (money-production-market problems)..

    in reply to: F-22 high altitude maneuverability #2651818
    over G
    Participant

    Arthur the problem is the momentum, maybe if you take a look in the “5 generation old fashion design” thread, you could understand that better,also the engine efficiency is not sooo good (at such heigh), you must need an strong horizontal compound to mantain the speed, but also you need an big vertical compound to make the turn but the power of the engine at such heighs is limited..

    in reply to: F-22 high altitude maneuverability #2651892
    over G
    Participant

    “I had to perform a missile [AIM-120] shot at 40.000ft, M1.6 and 7g” and later “entering a split-S with full a/b at 53.000ft and M1.98”.

    :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:

    propaganda, desperate advertising…. :rolleyes: :D, theres no doubth about the raptors capacibilities, but that is exagerated….

    maneuvring at those altitudes indeed requires thrust vectoring rather than aerodynamic surfaces

    Well, the problem, in the case of the raptor is that the TV only helps to mantein high aoa, but not tooooo much in the turn…

    in reply to: Israeli Superweapon? #2057749
    over G
    Participant

    nuke?

    About that how many nuclear reactors have israel???, i have read that they have 100 nukes???, i doubth even 10, but that depends of their nuclear infrastructure, so how many recators have???

    in reply to: MiG-23/27 Flogger and MiG-25/31 #2653580
    over G
    Participant

    Kia bidu, youre talking in theorics but the permissible g load are technological limited at transonic-supersonic (by the airframe strenght) speeds….also the tangential speed increase the centrifugal aceleration…..

    Hell i have explained that before a looooot of times

    in reply to: MiG-23/27 Flogger and MiG-25/31 #2653661
    over G
    Participant

    the later is really impressive but the Flogger is not.

    Flogger the mig29 turn rate also decrease at mach .9, but the point here is that almost not any dogfight is done at such speeds, the dogfight speeds are between mach 0.5 and mach 0.8 (including corner speed) yes there other tactics,but that is another thread…….

    in reply to: Let's try again: Russian school siege part deux #1963755
    over G
    Participant

    well,well there are too much subjetives comments “terrorists are goods/bads, russians are bads/good” remember that this is an hate war….all are humans, all are assesines, we must discuss this more objetive, please…..

    An political (limited) participation of the rebelds could decrease the terrorism????

    btw where comes the rebeld chechenian support (turkie????)

    in reply to: MiG-23/27 Flogger and MiG-25/31 #2653911
    over G
    Participant

    Crobato

    NOT related to th speed of said airframe

    read again…..

    Hell i have explained that before a looooot of times

    in reply to: Let's try again: Russian school siege part deux #1963840
    over G
    Participant

    well,well,well, another alternative could be to convnice or invite the rebeld chechenians with an fromal politic representation, im sure that such “move” could reduce the terrorism, yes,yes i know it would be polemic, but i think that it will be an good idea…

    in reply to: Let's try again: Russian school siege part deux #1963919
    over G
    Participant

    Should the Russian Army still fight in this country?

    Sadly the must stay there….but this is an war of the police-intelligence not for generals and “patriots”

    in reply to: Let's try again: Russian school siege part deux #1963925
    over G
    Participant

    You leave now and maybe you have chance. Sure there would be terrorists attacks.

    And leave an country with an terrorist goverment?????, there will be more deads, leaving an paradise for the international terrorism????

    We are all well aware of your fictional belief that everything Russian is inferior

    SOC that was pathetic……..

    in reply to: Let's try again: Russian school siege part deux #1963967
    over G
    Participant

    The problem here is that the russian inteligence service is highly corrupted, that need an “purge”, but putin is included…

    in reply to: Let's try again: Russian school siege part deux #1963980
    over G
    Participant

    Maybe it should give Chechnya full independence

    Very,very,very bad idea…

    in reply to: Let's try again: Russian school siege part deux #1963982
    over G
    Participant

    So what is your solution to the terrorist problem? Ignorance? Appeasement? Ask them to leave?

    Again…

    Thas the diference between european and american(nowdays) perspective of the terrorism, you only can fight against that by the police-espionage no by “gloriusly freedom armies”,i guess that in the next years we will see a loooooot of irakies terrorists in western countries

    in reply to: Let's try again: Russian school siege part deux #1964002
    over G
    Participant

    If the only way to rid themselves of the problem is to raze the whole area, then they should, in my opinion, go right down there and start razing.

    How many inocents will pay??? and how many terrorist will born???

    Thas the diference between european and american(nowdays) perspective of the terrorism, you only can fight against that by the police-espionage no by “gloriusly freedom armies”,i guess that in the next years we will see a loooooot of irakies terrorists in western countries.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,501 through 1,515 (of 1,640 total)