hmmm, thats an official concept, or only an interpretation??, i think that could work well if is an unstable design,any weight data???

Adrian, you have not said anything new, but im not impressed ,frankw, you have your answer from Adrian 😉

yes but the problem here is the quantum theory, and specially the uncertanly concept (virtual particles) and duality concepts, we still dont have an unified theory, quantum physics isnt aplicated only in ministructures, for example, the black hole hawking radiation.

isnt so difficult to understand, for example, the quantum physics is based in the an simple concept, the universe works in steps (yes very small and fast), in fact the atom layers are those steps.

well, we live in an occidental world, its obvius that the western media will be in favor of the tomcats or phantoms (me, that know some aerospace design basics -because i have som friends that works in the industry- have verificated that continuosly), no doubt that the f14 is an great interceptor, but the f14 IRIAF claims are very very exagerated, like the iraki claims…

and please dont start with these excuses like “ahhh, noooo that was because the navy main role was strike”, because that was the f18 main role……like if phoenixs were not shoot in the GW1, comon….

well, yes im agreed, the airframe was too small, but the 404 is an interesting plus at medium-high level, anyway, yes is an 3th generation airframe-aerodynamic with an new engine, nothing more.

the f20 was powered by the f404 -i think(im not an aviation fan but an technology fan)- that would be an significative advantage over the f16