dark light

Hot_Charlie

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 466 through 480 (of 613 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Red Arrows #2507981
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    The SUN newspaper came up with the headline several weeks ago and there was no truth to it – a fact that was established about 2 minutes after it hit the press. You may have noticed that the “government” has already responded. Sadly the whole idea of the no. 10 petitions site is diluted by the number of misinformed and generally daft petitions on there. This was one of the former.

    The e-petition asking the Prime Minister to “to Allow the Red Arrows to Fly at the 2012 Olympics” is ongoing. This is a response in advance of the closing date from the Government.

    It is not true to suggest that the Government has banned the Red Arrows from celebrations to mark the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games.

    The organising committee of London 2012 will decide what to include in the celebrations – but with five years to go, decisions are yet to be made on what the celebrations will look like, although you can be assured that they will be a spectacular showcase of Britain’s best.

    in reply to: MK356 BBMF Spitfire in for a service #1244653
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    I take it it will come out in a nice sandy shade?

    in reply to: Sounds of Shuttleworth LP #1247020
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    Tried ebay? They appear occasionally, and earlier in the year at least there was an Australian shop selling 2 or 3 of them on ebay too.

    In fact, Vol 1 and 2 are available now on ebay – vol 2 for £4.99 as a “Buy it now” item, vol 1 in auction with £3.99 start.

    http://music.search.ebay.co.uk/Shuttleworth_Records_W0QQ_trksidZm37QQcatrefZC12QQfromZR40QQsacatZ1071

    in reply to: Twin-Nose gear collapse. #434419
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    Would it have been safer to land with engines off? Or is it safer to power in? That gives more control but also more fire danger? Tough decision to make. What do they teach in emergency training on this point? Flip a coin?

    Much easier to do what you know and do a power on landing, and the cut the engines over the threshold. A power off landing would be a less familiar situation, which would be a lot easier to make a pigs ear of and potenially not land safely at all.:)

    in reply to: you must be kidding. #2509485
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    * Just going by comparable PFIs and the like y’know 😮

    A PFI is only comparable with a 40 year long robbery of the public coffers…;) 😀

    Mr Brown likes them though…:rolleyes:

    in reply to: Heavy landing at London City. #589511
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    Where abouts was the Red Bull temporary airfield? And will it do test flights at LCY?

    Here

    in reply to: you must be kidding. #2509770
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    Don’t just blame the civilians – the forces have f**ked themselves up too.

    I think around 1/3rd of the RAF are now officers – whereas in WWII the ratio
    was around 1 officer for 20 enlisted men.

    Turkeys do not vote for Christmas, and the officers will not vote to reduce the officer corps.

    I don’t really see your point, although I admit some people in high places will use their time to ensure a decent retirement (or chairmanship/directorship!)…

    As for your stat, I think the figure is closer to 1/4, and you have to remember that a lot, if not most of the jobs now done by civvy contractors such as VT, Serco and Babcock are those that would have been done by “the ranks” in a former life.

    Regarding the title of the recent article”Is the R.A.F. broken” hasnt there been some mistake? Should it not have read “Is the Royal Navy broken”

    Well, it is Air Forces Monthly, not Navies Monthly…;)

    On a serious note, well done AFM on a very good article.

    in reply to: UK F-35 question #2509784
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    I haven’t been paying too much attention to the JSF programme, but won’t the JSF force be co-located as JF Harrier is now? I so I’d imagine they’d be coincident, presumably with whichever numberplate the OCU takes…

    in reply to: Butzweilerhof airfield #1253180
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    One of the runways (22) was still visible on googleearth until a month or so ago

    This Flashearth link shows the remaining runway, before it too disappeared.

    in reply to: Hurricane crash at Shoreham Airshow #1258068
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    SkyNews had photos on-screen less than 6 hours later… and those pics weren’t taken long after the incident either,as it was still burning… horrible sight. That’s news media for you these days. R.I.P,Brian…:(

    Sadly it’s the way they operate sans morals…

    Yesterday’s awful crash on the M4 was being covered by helicopter by the BBC, and almost perfectly on que as the presenter said “some of the bodies have yet to be removed from the scene”, the heli’s camera zooms into the wreck. No more than televised rubbernecking…:(

    in reply to: Dambusters filming at Scampton #1259461
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    I doubt that, but I could very well be wrong. The BBMF aircraft don’t normally participate in filming duties (Fluffy?) and I can’t see them making up ‘474 just for the sake of a few seconds of film.

    Not being cynical at all, but I expect if enough cash was thrown the MoD’s* way then…

    (*who would then guarantee the BBMF wouldn’t ever see any of the cash…:rolleyes: )

    in reply to: Hurricane crash at Shoreham Airshow #1261365
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    With all due respect Rivet, I’m sure the needs of a fine airman’s family and friends are greater at this time than you desperation for a name…

    Some other less restrained fora may well be accusing you of wanting the name for “other” reasons with a post like that…

    RIP, and my best wishes to your family, friends, and your fellow airmen.

    in reply to: Hurricane crash at Shoreham Airshow #1262822
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    This was posted over at UKAR an hour or so ago by an eyewitness. The posters there were reporting it was a Hurricane (unconfirmed as TBs)

    UKAR Thread

    in reply to: What flight names do the British Typhoon squads use? #2523321
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    A quick search of google and it various results produces:

    “Rampage”, “Tyrant”, “Getsum”, “Havoc”, “Nightmare”, “Zenith” and “Chaos” for 3(F) Sqn Typhoons.

    “Gringo”, “Nitro”, “Razor”, “Samson”, “Totem”, “Tyrant” for 11…

    “Monkey” & “Zircon” for 17(R)…

    “Bluster”, “Fazer”, “Relax”, “Triplex” (nice one) for 29(R)…

    and “Typhoon” of course…

    (all courtesy of “Fighter Control” (.co.uk)):)

    in reply to: Manned Canberra PR9 replacement #2523472
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    To answer the question, I’d buy four of the RB-57Fs from the boneyard, four C-141s for their engines (giving plenty of spares), and pay NASA to bring them to the same standard as their WB-57Fs.

    Jacko, don’t you actually mean we should get a civvy contractor to buy the PR.9s for 50p each (oh no, we’ve already sold them – ok, can’t do the 50p bit then), and then lease them back to the RAF for £2m/flying hour?:diablo:

Viewing 15 posts - 466 through 480 (of 613 total)