dark light

Hot_Charlie

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 613 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The Sky's the limit for disabled trainee pilot #435093
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    Well done. Good for him.:)

    in reply to: Mon 25 Jun – VR930 Still In NI #1256758
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    Definately not – I am entitled to my opinion the same as anyone else, prefer the phrase U/S myself 🙂

    Quite. An aircraft can be unservicable, but what/how on earth does “it’s gone tech” mean. Does it mean the aircraft’s gone all technical on you, or has developed a love of Tomorrow’s World? Daftest phrase in the book…

    in reply to: R.I.P Binbrook! #1256768
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    I flew over Binbrook a couple of times this week and noted how complete it appeared (other than the long lost runways). How wrong I was. Seems like it’s the old trick of leaving the place until they have to demolish the place.

    in reply to: Tucano for Private Use? #435255
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    Could one fly one of these (turbine ) beasties on a simple PPL? I know one would have to get a check out on type etc etc.

    Yes, as a single engine turboprop I presume…

    It is not clear to me what is the profile of prospective civil operators of these expensive aeroplanes.

    If you need a fast, touring machine, perhaps for business you are more likely to need 4 seats.
    If you really want to go fast, you can get a jet, say Venom, Gnat or L.29 for a third of the money.
    If you need a civilian/club aerobatic trainer, well, Bulldog, Yak52, Cap20, and others, all sub £50k
    If you love to wearing a green grow-bag, and cruising around in an ex-military aircraft, why not a Harvard, Yak52, Jet Provost.

    For the same reason people have JPs etc? It may be more expensive to procure, but it could be cheaper to run. Also, its large gyroscopic implement on the nose could be attractive to though maybe thinking of moving up to a nice big piston. Shame the tailwheel’s at the wrong end. A fun aircraft all round, which isn’t that difficult to fly, doesn’t burn as much fuel, and is probably more palatable to anyone who complains about noise. The cockpit is probably a little more user friendly and modern than most of the above too.

    in reply to: BBMF Flypast over Buckingham Palace #1271976
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    Do we know many pilots who have glided a Hawk or is it preferable to pull the handle and leave it to it’s own devices?

    Slightly off topic, but to answer that, a Hawk pilot was awarded the AFC in the late 90s having glided a Hawk 35 miles or so to a safe landing at a strip in Norway IIRC…:) I expect he was slightly higher than the average flypast height though. I think the key point is a Hawk would have the ability to convert speed to height etc and glide to a safer direction before ejecting.

    in reply to: Tucano for Private Use? #435776
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    Did you have more infos about this??

    What kind of damage?

    Vector (from Brazil)

    It’s probably worth noting this was on the Shorts production line in Belfast in case you were thinking this was in Embraer’s plant.:)

    in reply to: Replica K5054 crash #1278658
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    Wroughton 1994 from memory. I spent the weekend there looking after G-OYAK and G-OXVI.

    Indeed. It was sat in the static park nose on displaying its bent prop…

    in reply to: Tucano for Private Use? #436020
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    If you read the rest of the thread you’ll find that a batch of non-flyable Tucanos have been sold off. Presumably the ones you are talking about.

    We are discussing a batch of 15 flyers that are about to be sold.

    My question is…

    What is the RAF replacing them with?

    My guess is that the one’s currently on the disposal market are the least airworthy of the “flyers” in store – bearing in mind out of 130 bought, minus those lost, there are about 50-60 in storage. Note most of them on the DSA site at the moment are red, white and grey…

    There is the familarity factor that will make them want the Tucano

    The familiarity factor is really limited. The Shorts Tucano was a very different beast to the Embraer Tincan (we put a decent engine in for a start), and the Super-Tincan is a very different aeroplane all together.

    All being well, it would be nice to see it being replaced by this, which has also been seen in the Cranwell circuit in the last 18 months:

    http://www.aermacchi.it/images/M311_2.jpg

    in reply to: Belfast Truss Hangers #1298965
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    Several of them were destroyed at Bracebridge Heath in 2001 (?). However there is still one which has been reclad (it’s blue). Can anyone confirm what type that is?

    in reply to: Hendon bashing – can you do better? #1304125
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    Here’s a thought – why not utilise the skills of a recently retired suitably qualified RAF Officer aged 50+ (ok, probably won’t have the Museum Studies degree or whatever, but the right person would come with tonnes of practical experience, and bring enthusiasm for the service, an appreciation of its history and ethos). Take him on as a civil servant, keep them in “uniform” if they so wish.

    In return, a nice job based mainly in the capital, a decent salary to supplement the (retired Sqn Ldr) pension, and god forbid, you’d get a new face in as they would retire every 5-10 years…

    Just a thought. I know of a couple of people who’d probably love to do it.

    in reply to: Spitfire – Robert Taylor #1317801
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    A “great” place to find out what people will pay for prints nowadays is ebay. This print and “Hurricane” with Bob Stanford Tuck’s signature appear quite often. Unfortunately (from memory) the prices they go for are a lot less than you would see retail wise (below £100), such as at Aces High (“Hurricane”, framed was over £500 IIRC).

    in reply to: Any cost effective transponders ? #390244
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    According to some theoretical research carried out by the PFA the hand held unit concept is flawed for several reasons.

    1 The detectable range is likely to be very low.
    2 The occupants of the aircraft are likely to be exposed to above the EU health and safety levels of radiation.
    3 the unit as specified will not meet international standards so would only be of use in the UK.
    4 The unit does not yet exist in a completed form and no firm costs are available.

    Preferable to being dead though. Fewer radio calls along the lines of “Pop up traffic, 12 O’clock, 1 mile, no height information, probable glider” etc…

    in reply to: Shuttleworth's Gladiator & SE-5A #1326625
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    Does anybody know what happened to the proposal (mentioned on the radio news last week) initiated by Germany that the swastika should be banned on an EEC wide basis?

    Maybe they should be reminded of the very dangerous practice of erasing visual symbols of history…

    in reply to: Shuttleworth's Gladiator & SE-5A #1327075
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    The PC crowd must already be in hysterics if that’s the case. There are currently swastikas on the Jungmann, Primary Glider, Bestmann, Stieglitz, Klemm and Storch.

    There’s nothing but a large swastika on the Storch!:)

    in reply to: Shuttleworth's Gladiator & SE-5A #1327095
    Hot_Charlie
    Participant

    Anything other than pre-war RAF and I think a lynch mob may be heading to hangar one…

Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 613 total)