dark light

Phillip Rhodes

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 751 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: New Battle of Britain film ???? #1095565
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    In all honesty, you can make a decent film for $80m, but don’t expect any A-List celebrities to be involved, unless they worked for scale (minimum wage as approved by the various trade unions).

    Yes we are in a recession, but Hollywood hasn’t slowed down in making content for either the silver screen or television. I would imagine that “Their Finest Hour” is trying to work beyond their own capabilities. It’s one thing to sell a few gifts (Books/DVDs/Models) at a few airshows, but for someone with limited experience in cinema film production to go to Hollywood with an idea and begging bowl isn’t going to succeed.

    In all honesty, making a feature film can be an easy and affordable process, but you have to choose your subject matter very carefully. The Blair Witch Project was made for $22,000 and grossed $248,639,099. So it can be done. CGI and Digital Cinema (goodbye 35mm) means you can make films more cheaply.

    The cheaper the film is to make the easier it is to secure funding from distributors, DVD labels and TV sales. I would not get involve with this or any film as a private investor.

    If they could make a film for less than £6m, which is doable using CGI and digital photography, they might be lucky enough to make a decent TV drama, but you would have to reduce the narrative from the whole BoB to just one single event, that might involve a few static aircraft. Take for example the recent BBC4 film The First Men in the Moon (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_First_Men_in_the_Moon_(2010_film)). That film cost less than £2m, I believe. Not an Oscar-winning film, but I would be happy to have my name associated with it.

    in reply to: Out in time for Christmas? #1096205
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Okay (big sigh), what is IT?

    Sorry, what is IT?

    in reply to: Westland fixed-wing aircraft-Surviving examples? #1096214
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Westland-Hill Pterodactyl Science Museum (would love to see one of those fly again)…

    in reply to: Nice Whitley pics over on WIX #1096392
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Possibly No.102 (Ceylon) Squadron based at RAF Driffield. Squadron code is DY.

    The Whitley with the fabric (?) missing from the starboard wing – it’s a known incident, and a similar has featured elsewhere.

    in reply to: Duxford Visit – 22Oct10 #1099028
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Nice pictures as usual Brian.

    Agreed and a request:

    I know it can be done, but I haven’t done any online research, but have you thought about creating your own 3D still images, which we can view if we wore the right glasses?

    I would imagine that you’d need two identical cameras – which I think you have?

    Just a suggestion.

    Keep up the good work.

    in reply to: The Ultimate Aviation Book? #1101553
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Thunder and Lightnings by Jan Mark (which would make an excellent film) or The Brylcreem Boys by Robert Freeman (which would also make an excellent TV series)…

    in reply to: General Discussion #324767
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Just posted a message on the BSAC Forums, suggesting it could be turned into an artificial reef.

    in reply to: Where can we park the Ark? #1905209
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Just posted a message on the BSAC Forums, suggesting it could be turned into an artificial reef.

    in reply to: WANTED: Good home for the Harrier GR9 #1102830
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Still having an aircraft carrier with no aircraft will be amusing to our Allies!

    Firstly, no doubt within a few weeks the two ships being built will be re-branded as helicopter carriers, and secondly, how many Buccaneers are there in preservation? :O)

    in reply to: WANTED: Good home for the Harrier GR9 #1103005
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    I hope they mothball the Harriers/Tornados/Artillery/Tanks that are planned to be axed – JUST IN CASE…

    Oh, apparently it might be the case that some soldiers currently being fired upon in Afghanistan might be given their P45s (compulsory redundancies) , while those not being kicked out will be asked (sorry, ordered) back to the front-line more frequently.

    in reply to: WANTED: Good home for the Harrier GR9 #1103024
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Here’s the full statement

    http://www.direct.gov.uk/prod_consum_dg/groups/dg_digitalassets/@dg/@en/documents/digitalasset/dg_191634.pdf

    with this titbit

    Cheers for the link – I was trying to find the document on the MoD website.

    in reply to: WANTED: Good home for the Harrier GR9 #1103126
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Going, going, gone and gone and gone and gone and gone…

    In order to meet this new structure the Royal Air Force will:

    • Reduce by around 5000 personnel to about 33,000 by 2015 , and with an assumption, for now, of a requirement of about 31,500 by 2020;
    • Withdraw the C-130 Hercules transport fleet ten years earlier than planned as we transition to the more capable and larger A400M;
    • Withdraw the Sentinel surveillance aircraft once it is no longer required to support operations in Afghanistan;
    • Rationalise the RAF estate;
    • Retain Tornados, which will continue to operate in Afghanistan;
    • Remove Harrier from service in the transition to a future fast jet force of Typhoon and JSF. This will mean a gap for carrier fast jet operations. JSF, like Harrier, will be operated jointly by RAF and Royal Navy pilots;
    • Not bring into service the Nimrod MRA4;
    • Withdraw VC-10 and the three variants of Tristar aircraft from 2013 as we transition towards the more capable A330 future strategic transport and tanker aircraft.

    in reply to: Got room for a Nimrod MR4? #1103265
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    I read somewhere that the Coast Guard are to buy or lease an executive type jet aircraft for us as a patrol aircraft.

    in reply to: Got room for a Nimrod MR4? #1103298
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Bring back the Shackleton 😀

    in reply to: Aviation Film Posters #1111248
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Found myself reworking the original 1960s Battle of Britain Quad movie poster. An original will set you back around £600. Ouch!

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 751 total)