dark light

Phillip Rhodes

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 751 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: What to do in Florida?? #1114267
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    There is a Shuttle launch on November 1st: http://www.nasa.gov/missions/highlights/schedule.html

    in reply to: Interesting Paintjob On A PT-22 #1115348
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    N82D was formally The Queen’s Flight and would look wonderful in her original QF paint scheme – even if the extra weight of her special paint reduced performance.

    http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g151/rivetjoint/devon/canon565391.jpg

    Other pictures of her former colour scheme here: http://forums.airshows.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=5751

    NOTE Not sure if we are allowed to embed photographs from other websites. Can a moderator please advise? I’ve done it before (copying image URL), but not keen on doing something not permitted.

    in reply to: Interesting Paintjob On A PT-22 #1115352
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Agreed, though painting your aircraft must be safer than towing a political banner, isn’t that right Mr Farage…!

    in reply to: My Visit to ?Newark #1116156
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Brilliant museum and amazing staff. I accidentally left my keys in the cafe (not sure how?), but the curator posted them back to me. On another visit I missed the last bus back to Newark and another member of staff offered me a lift. Now you don’t get that level of service at Cosford or Duxford, but you do at Elvington, which is another museum whose level of service extended to giving me a lift into York, and very much appreciated it was too.

    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Philip, have you been reading my threads over the past few seasons? This is the first one that has centred on the pilots ALL of the others cover the backroom staff and volunteers in one way or another.

    Oooops, sorry :O)

    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Excellent photographs and an excellent tribute to those who fly and maintain an excellent collection, but please don’t forget the back-room boys, especially the volunteer fire and rescue service at Shuttleworth. Does anyone have any recent photographs of their vehicles.

    For more info checkout: http://www.avfs.org/

    in reply to: Bomber Movie #1142073
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    The Land Rover used in 633 Squadron was shown before the raid in a scene set in Scotland. At the end of the film you can also see both a Mk6 and DP1 crash tender (both introduced in the 1950s).

    in reply to: "I'm so tipped off…" #1142633
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    So sign of any crash tenders present!

    You do realise that for a large Airbus A380 you need at least four heavy-duty crash tenders, preferably larger than 1/12th scale 😀

    in reply to: Bomber Movie #1142911
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Deciding which film to make – hoping it will become a hit isn’t an exact science. Some big movies with big budgets and big stars do flop, and on a regular basis. And yes some very low budget films that feature talented, yet unheard of actors do make a killing at the box office.

    For many years I thought that Operation Jericho would make an excellent film – shot entirely on green screen and CGI – very similar in style to Sin City.

    Oh, the three connections between Richard Attenborough and RAF Bomber Command?

    1. He starred in “A Matter of Life and Death” as a deceased RAF flyer. His only line in the film was: “It’s heaven, isn’t it?”
    2. He also starred in “journey Together” as David Wilton, a trainee pilot, who has poor height perception and cannot master his landings. Therefore he is sent to navigator’s school. The film was produced by the RAF FILM UNIT, and featured mostly RAF personnel.
    3. Accordingly, Richard Attendborough was in the film because previously he had joined the RAF as an Air Gunner, then did a film camera operators course. He flew on several missions over occupied Europe.

    in reply to: Bomber Movie #1143217
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Film finance in the UK is problematic, unless you have a studio behind it. Usually UK films are low budget (less than £10m is considered a low budget film). Even if a producer secures development or script funding from various arts organisations, the bulk of the money needed to start filming (no matter how good the script or commercially viable the film) sometimes isn’t forthcoming.

    Take for example Red Dwarf (popular TV series). The producers for years have been trying to turn it into a film – but funding has always been problematic. And even if you are an established film-maker, this does not guarantee funding – it took Richard Attendborough 25 years to make Ghandi.

    To keep this message relevant to “Historic Aviation” can anyone spot a connection or two between Ghandi (the film) and Bomber Command? I can think of three.

    in reply to: EE Lightning & The CAA)old thread 2008) #1145824
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    The only way that a Lightning will ever fly in the UK is if it was owned/operated by the MoD, and the only unit I can think that would fly such an aircraft here and now is the Empire Test Pilots’ School. Find a new use for the Lightning and that’s half the battle won, though the cost of rebuilding even a single example back to life means it’s a non-starter, unless you could secure sponsorship from someone for whom this would be the only way they could get close to owning a Lightning. Know anyone with – what – £20m to play with? And it wouldn’t be a F6 – probably a T-Bird.

    in reply to: Alternative British name for the term 'Warbird'? #1146402
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    The process of finding a new name to replace an established term, only a few years ago would be worth gold to some branding/consultancy firm. Why call it “Royal Mail” when you can sit on your bottom for an afternoon (usually in Starbucks) and re-brand a well established company “Consignia” and charge a small fortune in the process – just for a scribbled name on a napkin.

    Warbird is a term that appears to cover all military aircraft, not just historical aircraft preserved today. I could make a few suggestions, but I charge £750 an hour (not unheard of) 😀

    Oh, Consignia?

    Consignia by name and Consignia by nature, the new branded name was consigned to history after only a few years, along with 17,000 jobs.

    in reply to: Blackpool Vulcan #1148314
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Sadly she was scrapped (image URL copied from another forum message – image by XL391):

    http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/bb280/XL391/DSCN2618.jpg

    in reply to: Heads up Google Earth has 1945 views! #1148679
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Are those Canberra bombers on 1945 RAF Wyton?

    Pity the resolution isn’t as good as modern satellite imagery, but a useful tool.

    in reply to: Heads up Google Earth has 1945 views! #1148681
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Okay, I’m officially confused. According to Google Earth, RAF Cranfield didn’t exist in 1945, but it did. I would imagine therefore that some B/W are pre-war and pre-expansion.

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 751 total)