dark light

Phillip Rhodes

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 376 through 390 (of 751 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pierrepoint – Airfield used?? #1229554
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Personally I would to string up a few individuals who have allowed aircraft to be scrapped and aerodromes to be demolished. The list of crimes and misdemeanours is long and someone has to pay. Sad thing is the list of criminals is getting longer. We don’t learn.

    in reply to: Pierrepoint – Airfield used?? #1229716
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    I was offered FREE cinema tickets to watch the film, but thought it would be too sick. That said, I watched it last night and thought it an interesting film. I remember my teacher explaining the death penalty to us kids in third year junior school (around 32 years ago). Since that “chat” I’ve been anti death penalty.

    That said, hanging people in a hangar…

    in reply to: No.203 Advanced Flying School #1183960
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    In addition, does anyone have a badge of No.203AFS they would like to post, and know when it was first issued?

    in reply to: Waddington Airshow, Saturday 5th July 2008. BIG POST! #507466
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Okay, I’m a bit worried. Nice pictures by the way. I visited Waddo on the Sunday. Now, unless it flew out on Saturday night, HOW THE **** DID I MISS THE B52!!! Where was it?

    in reply to: Miles M1 Satyr G-ABVG – Registration Mark Issue #1211183
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Whether or not my proposal to build a replica Miles M1 Satyr will “take off”, depends on the Light Aircraft Association (formally the PFA), the availability of a suitable engine, and my abilities to get off my bottom.

    There are so many issues to be resolved that it’s too early to say whether this is another “day dream” or a viable proposition. More later…

    Oh, below is a rough outline of what the Satyr looked like (colour scheme). Personally I think it’s too wacky. I’m thinking of painting her silver.

    http://www.driffieldaerodrome.co.uk/satyr.jpg

    Phil Rhodes

    in reply to: Information Wanted Miles M1 Satyr #1215104
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Ah, I’m glad to see that having offered you the apple from the tree, you could not resist being tempted by it! Maybe I’ll live to see a replica Miles Satyr. Maybe you can construct a replica of the Hon. Mrs Victor Bruce to go with it. Now that would frighten grown men!

    In all honesty I looked at the Satyr years ago and thought: “no, it’s not important or indeed impressive enough…”. The only Miles design I really looked at was the original M2.

    But when you consider that the Satyr was the first of thousands of Miles aircraft…

    Firstly, anyone reading this, please don’t hold your breathe. We are talking years and years. My only real concern is that someone might build it before me. Also, this isn’t going to be an easy project – though probably more doable that saving RAF Driffield (not a lost cause as things stand).

    Regarding the Satyr, I know there is an engine available. I haven’t contacted the owners, but that will happen within a week or so. I’m trying to sort myself out, before I can even start on this project proper. I’m having to add at least a year or two, to sort out my personal circumstances, before I can start gluing bits of wood together.

    I know that detailed plans don’t exist. The forward fuselage is covered with plywood, so it is unclear what is beneath. More later…

    in reply to: Information Wanted Miles M1 Satyr #1215107
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Well theres a guy here selling scale plans for 4 euros….

    Scroll to the bottom of this link…

    Zeb

    DONE DEAL. Ordered!!! Love PayPal…

    in reply to: Pobjoy R : Availability #1222643
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Pobjoy – rare as hen’s teeth and equally difficult to keep running!

    A rather more robust alternative is the Rotec R-2800, being built in Australia.
    http://www.rotecradialengines.com/

    My understanding is that the R2800 is twice as heavy, twice the size and twice the power. Yet, it is too small for other projects I have considered.

    in reply to: Wanted Ideas For Replica Build… #1226742
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    That’s also 2 votes for the Airspeed Courier, RPSmith and myself. Even Phillip Rhodes thinks it’s a good choice. There was also an original 504N, but the Shuttleworth Collection decided to rebuild it as a 504K

    I do like the Courier, but I understand there are no plans and the engine is rare – no engine – no build. The Stuttleworth Collection’s Avro 504K started out as a model “K” before being converted into a model “N”, before being converted back to a model “K” in the 1950s. You are right, there is an original Model “N” in a Danish museum?

    in reply to: Wanted Ideas For Replica Build… #1226929
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Ok Phillip,

    Now you have a lot of options, have you got an idea already?

    Cheers

    Cees

    Firstly, many thanks for all your suggestions. I’ve drawn up a list of three aircraft, which no doubt will change in the coming months.

    Miles M1 Satyr

    Although Frederick George Miles and his brother built a biplane before the Satyr it didn’t (or wouldn’t) fly. Therefore the Miles Satyr was the first aircraft wholly designed by F G Miles that flew – the first of many designs. Is there another replica M1 either being constructed or in the planning stage?

    The size of the aircraft is appealing, though being a single seater, joyrides are out of the question. The main problem is the lack of an original engine. The Pobjoy R (75hp) was fitted to a limited number of aircraft, and finding an original will prove difficult and costly. Any suggestions for an alternative? Are the plans available? Don’t get me wrong, the aircraft appears to be a good subject for a replica-build, it simply doesn’t, you know…

    Avro 504N

    The Avro 405N is an interesting candidate. Built in large numbers, the aircraft superseded the model “K” in the 1920s. The availability of a Lynx engine is problematic, while there are several replicas being built, either in the UK or USA. I understand that one of these aircraft will be a model “N”. This aircraft appeals to me greatly and I do think a replica would fill a gap here in the UK. But, can anyone suggest an alternative to the Rotec R2800 (excluding the nine cylinder R3600)?

    Westland-Hill Pterodactyl MkIV

    Out of all the designs that I’ve looked at, the most enigmatic is the Westland-Hill Pterodactyl MkIV. Although slightly large and extremely complex, this aircraft is phenomenally a head-turner. The aircraft (44ft wingspan) was powered by a DH Gipsy III engine, which shouldn’t be a problem to acquire or substitute, but what about the plans?

    “The main feature, however, was a gear by which it was possible to sweep the wings backward and forward through an angular range of 4.75°. This operation, which enabled the machine to be trimmed when the centre of gravity was varied by alternative loadings, could be effected by the pilot while in flight.

    “The gear itself was in the nature of a large turnbuckle, connecting the front spars of the wings at their root, the rear spar roots being hinged by a ball joint and the bottom of the main Vee lift struts being similarly pivoted.” This feature would be difficult to replicate.

    The only redeeming features that make this aircraft a good candidate for a replica-build is that it is a monoplane, with a short fuselage and no tailplane. On the other hand, the striking wing would be a nightmare to replicate, as no two ribs are the same. That said, I can see no other aircraft that would receive as much attention from either the public or fellow anoraks as this prehistoric beast.

    Thing is, what will take me years to accomplish, AJD Engineering can achieve in twelve months, and for the same price. That leads me to the cost.

    Building any aeroplane is going to be expensive. Even if you spread the cost over several years, it isn’t going to be cheap. Unless I can pull myself out of debt and make some serious money, this and any other [mad-capped] project will remain just a pipe-dream, albeit one worth pursuing – even if any research undertaken can help someone else make things happen.

    That said, I really don’t like putting my neck on the line, even though it has become an occupational hazard or recurring trait. Making pretentious statements, like the one that started this thread only highlights ones own inadequacies and misgivings, which others usually point out. On the other hand, someone once said that a journey of a 1000 miles begins with a single step. One such journey involved a man from York, who 30 odd years ago started his dream with a £10 (?) purchase. One of my heroes is Tony Agar. I forget when, but he purchased the cockpit section of a DH Mosquito at an auction in Blackpool. Whereas most would be content with just owning the cockpit, Mr Agar didn’t stop there. He added a rear fuselage, wings and engines, resulting in the restoration and resurrection of a classic.

    With hard work and some good fortune, we can all make a difference or at least gain enjoyment from doing something different (but not train-spotting or pressing wild-flowers!). That said, I have a lot on my plate, most of which I won’t dwell on here. Thing is, last January I started http://www.avprints.co.uk, which marketed a series of P51D prints. Six months down the line and I’ve only sold four sets – not enough to live on – when my subsidised wages end in July. The problem wasn’t the prints, but rather my inability of market my wares. Accordingly, my confidence has taken a real battering and I need a victory to make life bearable. So I fight on, because I love aeroplanes and I believe…

    The research continues…

    Phil Rhodes

    in reply to: Wanted Ideas For Replica Build… #1233042
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    The Satyr – beauty in a ‘pint pot’ – as the attached image shows!

    Does anyone know what paint scheme/s were employed?

    Also, did you know that Satyr means:

    (a) In Greek mythology, a wood-dwelling creature with the head and body of a man and the ears, horns, and legs of a goat, (b) a man who displays inappropriate or excessive sexual behaviour or (c) a brown or grey butterfly with spotted wings.

    in reply to: Wanted Ideas For Replica Build… #1235861
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Just a thought.

    Have you considered lowering your sights slightly and just making a small(ish) part, like the rudder, of what ever aircraft takes your fancy? That way you can test out your wood, metal, fabric, doping and painting skills on an item that is manageable in terms of budget and time. If by making this component you then decide that the rest of the aircraft is out of your budget or skill level you’ll still have a nice object to hang on your wall.

    As I say…just a thought…maybe not a good one.

    Anne

    Go on…make a Grebe. No more complex and a lot smaller than an Avro 504N.

    Excellent idea Anne. As for the Grebe, do you have a spare engine going spare? 😀

    in reply to: Wanted Ideas For Replica Build… #1236220
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Many thanks for all your suggestions.

    Obviously building an aeroplane, even a none-flyer isn’t something you can do in a few weeks, unless your Miles Aircraft (M20). Secondly, it wont be cheap. But if you take it as read that it will take you years and not months, and if you break down the project, then it is an achievable goal. My inspiration is Tony Agar from York. I first met him when his aircraft was still in chunks at Elvington.

    There are a number of observations I would like to make. Firstly the role of CAD is important. If original plans are available, they need to be clear and precise. Redrawing them in CAD is an excellent way of getting to know the complexities of an aircraft’s design. Sadly me and CAD haven’t got on well. I learnt the very basics of ParaCAD at Sheffield Hallam University around 10 years ago, most of which I’ve now forgotten. I tried again with AutoCAD, but that was a nightmare. The 26 week course was only part-time (three hours a week) and with no software to use at home, it was impossible to learn, so after eight weeks I gave up.

    Working on average 500 hours per year (10 hours a week) over ten years would equate to 5,000 hours. Depending on the size of fuselage or wingspan, only a small workshop would be required. Most woodworking tools can be cheaply bought second-hand.

    I want to built an aircraft that will be distinct.

    The big question is this: how accurate do you build the replica? Too accurate and it becomes an impossibility to complete, while semi-scale doesn’t appeal to me. It must look and feel like the real thing. That said I don’t mind changing the design slightly or substituting materials – almost anything to get the job done. Obviously, there are some purists who will never appreciate the replica aircraft, even the most accurate of projects.

    So what can I get away with?

    In the USA some replica aircraft builders have replaced the traditional wooden fuselage with welded steel tubular frame. The exchange rate makes this an money saving proposition – until you factor in the shipping costs. China? Maybe not (lack of paperwork and QC issues). Then again, some shortcuts are not the preserve of just replica aircraft. Take for example the DH9. This aircraft featured a variety of spars, ranging from the ornate (complex to replicate), to the box standard box spar. The DH4 built in the UK were made from wood, but those in the USA were build from welded steel tube. Earlier versions of some UK aircraft (mostly 1920s single-engined types) started out as all-wooden wonders, but progressed to metal monsters, which are extremely difficult to replicate.

    I’ve also looked into cutting plywood components using a laser, which offers an accurate method of making the countless number of parts needed. And yes, you can cut plywood with an laser cutter, but only through a specialist firm. Obviously there are cost implications, but months could be saved. I am aware of the complexities of building a flyer. Engine availability is an issue. Then again, we are talking about me building an aircraft. Is this another pipedream?

    Many thanks to you all for making the suggestions. Did you know that Microsoft Word doesn’t hold “Brabazon” in its dictionary, when you hit the spell checker it suggested: “Baboon”. Anyway, here are the results in Bold and my comments.

    DH4 engine availability and too complex
    Avro 504N engine availability (anyone own a spare Lynx?)
    M20 too complex
    Gloster Grebe engine availability and too complex
    F.E.8 pass…
    George Cayley’s Glider been done
    Bleriot IX been done
    Avro Triplane been done
    Cody Biplane been done?
    Shorts Type 1, 2 or 3 remind me again…
    White Boxkite remind me again…
    BE2A been done (or was that a model “B”?)
    BE12 pass…
    Sopwith Tabloid been done
    Bristol Monoplane which one?
    DH Cirrus Moth been done
    Avro Avian been done
    Comper Swift been done
    Luton Minor been done
    DH6 too mundane
    Armstrong Whitworth FK10 pass…
    Flying Flea been done
    Airspeed Courier good choice
    Miles Satyr remind me again…
    Miles Hobby interesting – also thought about the original M2
    Miles M.52 too complex
    Siskin engine availability and too complex
    Shorts 184 Type too big
    Airspeed AS4 Ferry remind me again…
    DH4a engine availability and too complex

    Although not a final list, I would suggest the following:

    Westland Pterodactyl
    Avro 504N
    Miles M2 (the first of many sub-models)

    That said, I haven’t picked up a chisel in over 20 years, and I’m technically unemployed from July 11th. Some of you maybe aware of http://www.avprints.co.uk. This business venture was established with the help of New Deal. I had six months to test trade the business. I had thought the business was failing, but no. In reality I failed the business (big difference) – spent too much time trying to save RAF Driffield. The good news is that Pete West is creating a profile of Meteor T7 WA591, which should be ready soon. Those interested, please let me know. I was also chuffed that Flypast reviewed my set of P51D Mustang prints (latest issue, which resulted in a few sales), so I’m not giving up on anything.

    Best Wishes

    Phil Rhodes

    in reply to: Avro 504N Question… #1240037
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    So, was the Shuttleworth Collection’s H5199 an original “K” converted to an “N”, then converted back to a “K”? Confused…?

    Phil Rhodes

    P.S. Does anyone know where one can get hold of a Armstrong-Siddeley Lynx engine…?

    in reply to: DH4 Survivors and Replicas #1188008
    Phillip Rhodes
    Participant

    Many thanks for the info. Very much appreciated.

    Best Wishes

    Phil Rhodes

Viewing 15 posts - 376 through 390 (of 751 total)