Great idea.
I’m sure that they could just move the Gibraltar gun out of the way, and pop it back afterwards.
And build a new Mk I Spitfire to take the 8 .303s (unless you can persuade the BBMF to loan their Mk II P7350). You refer to a ‘static displayed Spitfire based at Duxford’ suitable for taking 8 .303s. Exactly which one do you have in mind? :confused:
And forgive my further confusion, but is this intended to be a blank or live firing exercise? If the former, why the requirement for butts, and the H&S concerns? You talk about ‘guns firing into a wall of sand’, but also about the guns being loaded with blanks. What exactly do you expect these blank rounds to fire into this wall of sand? :confused:
Not April 1st, is it? :confused: :confused: :confused:
Even blank rounds can be very dangerous and can kill – hence the need to fire into sand – you also need to keep people behind the aircraft and not at the sides. It would be too much to ask to fire live rounds at a public event.
Any suitable “static” spitfire would work, an airworthy example would probably be frowned upon by the CAA, even if it was not going to be flown with working .303 MGs (9/11 and all that – just in case Bin Liner and his merry men from IKEA might want to steel the thing and shoot down a passing Lufthansa airliner).
Great idea in theory, though I imagine the insurance boys and health and safety apparatchiks might have something to say on the matter…
They make useful targets though :dev2:
Philip – have you got a new job at the Inland Revenue?
Damn my cover is blown
Regarding the filming of The Battle of Britain movie at Duxford, when the hangar was blown up there were several cameras trained on the hangar, but for whatever reason communications weren’t brilliant and when the director shouted “action” and the structure was blown up only one camera was rolling. 😮
What a waste – even it it was filmed. One thing though in the film the colour scheme was more accurate than it is today…
Yes, I do 😎
Cees
B***** and it’s only Tuesday 😮
Why don’t you convert this into a poll with all the main magazines, rather than create a slagging-off forum? That way we can all cast our vote anonymously.
constructive critisism and debate is not slagging-off, but what the heck :p
Whose work is this? Excellent – any chance of twisting their arm to do RAF Driffield – I’m sure some Flight Sim fans would like to fly in and out of this former base?
Phil
PS Had this idea of creating a Mk50 Spitfire with Turbo Engine and Ejector Seat – very much like the Piper Enforcer – if you have a few hours to spare?
Hello,
I thought some of you would be pleased to see a new movie about the FW190 in the sky.
See this link and you find a beautifull movie of the Flug Werk Focke Wulf FW190 in it’s new paint in the sky.
http://www.avpics.de/lffamp/warbird.htmllook for this file: Flug Werk FW 190: 3. Testflug
Enjoy!
J.V.
Sadly during a follow-up test flight the pilot became lost and not knowing it accidently landed at Duxford where the aircraft was impounded by the OFMC :p
STOP IT RIGHT NOW IT’S NOT FUNNY 😀 WE ARE TALKING ABOUT OUR HERITAGE :p
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=2979&item=5532722877&rd=1 :p
The BIG question is did the person who recovered these items from the crash site obtain permission from the MoD? The law states that you must seek permission from the MoD – even if the aircraft crashed on foreign soil or was abandoned.
If so, then did he ask the MoD if they wanted the items recovered returned? If the MoD didn’t want them, then the items should be offered to the landowner. If not wanted by said landowner then and only then can the person who recovered the items keep them. The ammunition should have been handed to the police as soon as possible – no exceptions to that rule, I believe.
If this was an unauthorised dig then the person or persons involved broke the law and the items can be considered as stolen property. Anyone who deals in stolen property is committing a crime, etc.
OFF course we have got to hear from the seller – to get his side of the story. But I do think the MoD should be informed.
It’s a shame the item is only for collection. I’d love to see how much it would cost to send by 1st class post. 😀 😀
According to the Vulcan To the Sky website a Vulcan weighs in at around 110,000lb or 49895.12Kg. Now the Royal Mail charge £11.21 for a 20Kg parcel so IF they didn’t have an upper limit that would equate to £27,966.21. 😎
But knowing the post office the buggers would probably loose the ruddy thing :p
Dover for the Continent, Eastbourne for the incontinent.
You bugger – just ****ed myself laughing 😀
Nah, Hasegawa do ’em cheaper than that!
On the subject of plastic models, a few years ago I bought a 1960s Airfix model – a collector’s items still in it’s original packaging and in mint condition. The model was a Bristol Bulldog.
A few weeks later I visited Duxford and their museum shop – only to find the same model in modern packaging, which was more expensive that the collector’s item.
“One day your aeroplane could end up being part of a drink’s can or even another plane” – Eddie Izzard.
Sad though. And another reason why it’s always wise to save more than you think – attrition is a major problem.
Step 1: Open window
Step 2: Throw Fuji out
Step 3: Close window
Step 4: Buy Canon EOS 300DMartin
You can buy a Canon 10D for around £800 these days – I’d go for one of them – rather than a 300D or even a D70