dark light

Pembo330

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 721 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: BA accused over flights with one engine down #662850
    Pembo330
    Participant

    I haven’t seen this article before, but the story has being doing the rounds for some time.

    I have to say I agree with the FAA on this one. Sure, the passengers weren’t in any danger and sure the pilots followed BA procedure BUT the key is that the risk the passenger’s were subjected to was ‘greater’ than had they been flying on four engines.

    This is a perfect example in my opinion where money comes before safety. Now, I’m not saying those flights were unsafe, but they were less safe than had things been functionally normally (note the difference). People will disagree with me I’m sure but if an accident occured on one of these flights, and it was found that if they had an extra engine going, the plane would have survived, BA would be took to the cleaners on this.

    My view is, if there is a problem, get the plane down as soon as possible – unless it is safer to fly to the destination. Safety must prevail.

    in reply to: BA accused over flights with one engine down #705174
    Pembo330
    Participant

    I haven’t seen this article before, but the story has being doing the rounds for some time.

    I have to say I agree with the FAA on this one. Sure, the passengers weren’t in any danger and sure the pilots followed BA procedure BUT the key is that the risk the passenger’s were subjected to was ‘greater’ than had they been flying on four engines.

    This is a perfect example in my opinion where money comes before safety. Now, I’m not saying those flights were unsafe, but they were less safe than had things been functionally normally (note the difference). People will disagree with me I’m sure but if an accident occured on one of these flights, and it was found that if they had an extra engine going, the plane would have survived, BA would be took to the cleaners on this.

    My view is, if there is a problem, get the plane down as soon as possible – unless it is safer to fly to the destination. Safety must prevail.

    in reply to: A Very Wet Saturday At Manchester #662914
    Pembo330
    Participant

    What TCX route was the 747 working on GA?

    I’d love to get to the gate and see that waiting for me instead of the usual aircraft!

    in reply to: A Very Wet Saturday At Manchester #705222
    Pembo330
    Participant

    What TCX route was the 747 working on GA?

    I’d love to get to the gate and see that waiting for me instead of the usual aircraft!

    in reply to: North East Air Space #672725
    Pembo330
    Participant

    Here is a local report from BBC’s Inside Out carried out last year:-

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/insideout/northeast/series6/collision_course.shtml

    in reply to: North East Air Space #715907
    Pembo330
    Participant

    Here is a local report from BBC’s Inside Out carried out last year:-

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/insideout/northeast/series6/collision_course.shtml

    in reply to: North East Air Space #672727
    Pembo330
    Participant

    Here is a report from the BBC about a near miss at NCL in 2002:-

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/3209351.stm

    An RAF pilot took “an unnecessary risk” which almost saw his fighter jet smash into a passenger plane over Tyneside, according to a report.
    The high-speed Jaguar fighter, from RAF Coltishall, in Norfolk, was on a low-level training exercise over the north-east of England in July 2002, when the incident happened.

    A report from the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) said an inbound passenger plane, with up to 50 people on board and the RAF jet came within 100ft of collision.

    The CAA described the incident, shortly after 1400 BST on 2 July 2002, as one of the most serious ever.

    The incident involved a RJ85 passenger plane flying from Brussels to Newcastle and happened about 22 miles south east of Newcastle Airport.

    The Jaguar pilot was involved in a low-level training exercise with two other aircraft over the north-east of England.

    The report says the fighter pilot began a steep climb after the exercise – directly into the path of the inbound passenger plane.

    It says that instead of informing air traffic controllers at Newcastle Airport of his intention to climb, he spoke only to RAF personnel in London.

    Staff in London told him another aircraft was just one mile away. But the Jaguar pilot wrongly assumed this was another military jet flying at low-level.

    The report said cloudy conditions on the day added to an already dangerous situation and that the Jaguar pilot took an “unnecessary risk”.

    The report says when the passenger plane pilot was asked 17 seconds after the near miss by a Newcastle Airport controller if he had received a message to take avoiding action, the pilot replied “it’s a little bit late”.

    Afterr the incident the RAF changed its procedures involving crews training close to civilian air space.

    A Ministry of Defence spokeswoman said an area of controlled airspace had been set up at Newcastle Airport which aircraft could only enter after contacting a controller.

    The report said: “As it was, the subsequent encounter with the RJ85 was so close that only chance had prevented a collision.”

    The RAF said it regarded the near miss as “very serious” and that a “strong directive” had been issued to all jet pilots to ensure such a similar incident could not happen again.

    The pilot was not disciplined over the incident and the RAF said no actual rules had been broken.

    I’ll keep trying to find something on today’s story.

    in reply to: North East Air Space #715910
    Pembo330
    Participant

    Here is a report from the BBC about a near miss at NCL in 2002:-

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/3209351.stm

    An RAF pilot took “an unnecessary risk” which almost saw his fighter jet smash into a passenger plane over Tyneside, according to a report.
    The high-speed Jaguar fighter, from RAF Coltishall, in Norfolk, was on a low-level training exercise over the north-east of England in July 2002, when the incident happened.

    A report from the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) said an inbound passenger plane, with up to 50 people on board and the RAF jet came within 100ft of collision.

    The CAA described the incident, shortly after 1400 BST on 2 July 2002, as one of the most serious ever.

    The incident involved a RJ85 passenger plane flying from Brussels to Newcastle and happened about 22 miles south east of Newcastle Airport.

    The Jaguar pilot was involved in a low-level training exercise with two other aircraft over the north-east of England.

    The report says the fighter pilot began a steep climb after the exercise – directly into the path of the inbound passenger plane.

    It says that instead of informing air traffic controllers at Newcastle Airport of his intention to climb, he spoke only to RAF personnel in London.

    Staff in London told him another aircraft was just one mile away. But the Jaguar pilot wrongly assumed this was another military jet flying at low-level.

    The report said cloudy conditions on the day added to an already dangerous situation and that the Jaguar pilot took an “unnecessary risk”.

    The report says when the passenger plane pilot was asked 17 seconds after the near miss by a Newcastle Airport controller if he had received a message to take avoiding action, the pilot replied “it’s a little bit late”.

    Afterr the incident the RAF changed its procedures involving crews training close to civilian air space.

    A Ministry of Defence spokeswoman said an area of controlled airspace had been set up at Newcastle Airport which aircraft could only enter after contacting a controller.

    The report said: “As it was, the subsequent encounter with the RJ85 was so close that only chance had prevented a collision.”

    The RAF said it regarded the near miss as “very serious” and that a “strong directive” had been issued to all jet pilots to ensure such a similar incident could not happen again.

    The pilot was not disciplined over the incident and the RAF said no actual rules had been broken.

    I’ll keep trying to find something on today’s story.

    in reply to: Boeing reveals final 787 design #676265
    Pembo330
    Participant

    The 787 is clearly going to be a fantastic aircraft, but its looks today aren’t what we were expecting; certainly not as revolutionary from an aesthetics point of view as earlier indications showed. Almost looks like a NG 767 to put it simply.

    in reply to: Boeing reveals final 787 design #720062
    Pembo330
    Participant

    The 787 is clearly going to be a fantastic aircraft, but its looks today aren’t what we were expecting; certainly not as revolutionary from an aesthetics point of view as earlier indications showed. Almost looks like a NG 767 to put it simply.

    in reply to: A380 : first flight (Merged) #677031
    Pembo330
    Participant

    Watched this live over the net. 🙂

    An awesome day in civil aviation; a sigh of relief from me when big bird took to the sky.

    Let’s hope the rest of the flight and the landing goes well.

    Can’t wait to see this thing in service. 🙂

    in reply to: A380 : first flight (Merged) #720707
    Pembo330
    Participant

    Watched this live over the net. 🙂

    An awesome day in civil aviation; a sigh of relief from me when big bird took to the sky.

    Let’s hope the rest of the flight and the landing goes well.

    Can’t wait to see this thing in service. 🙂

    in reply to: Air India to select widebodies today… #677169
    Pembo330
    Participant

    More fantastic news for Boeing. 🙂

    in reply to: Air India to select widebodies today… #720822
    Pembo330
    Participant

    More fantastic news for Boeing. 🙂

    in reply to: End Of An Era For Britannia #679227
    Pembo330
    Participant

    I guess its the modern thing to do, but for us nostalgic enthusiasts (and many more I guess), this is a sad day.

    The vast majority though will not notice and many will be pleased to see Thomson branded aircraft (something many passengers associate with a decent package holiday).

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 721 total)