Don’t forget that the NCL Excel 738 is now a Scandic/Finnair 752. 🙂
Don’t forget that the NCL Excel 738 is now a Scandic/Finnair 752. 🙂
but tbh i see this as the start of the end of bmi l/h @ MAN
Who knows what the future holds but I doubt this is the case. BMI have done more for long-haul at Manchester than anyone else in recent years, and what’s more, they’ve done it successfully. I don’t see any evidence that the sucess won’t continue.
but tbh i see this as the start of the end of bmi l/h @ MAN
Who knows what the future holds but I doubt this is the case. BMI have done more for long-haul at Manchester than anyone else in recent years, and what’s more, they’ve done it successfully. I don’t see any evidence that the sucess won’t continue.
Some interesting points here.
As an aviation freak, I’d be disappointed if I got changed onto a 757 trans-pond rather than an A330.
However, most passengers aren’t aviation fans.
Those disappointed will likely be regular BMI long haul travellers who are used to the product. Your average ad-hoc business traveller and leisure traveller might not actually mind that much because they don’t travel BMI long haul that often and don’t have the comparison to make. The fact remains that BMI are the only airline offering direct services to Washington from Manchester and the North of England; a high proportion of people would still rather travel direct from Manchester on a 757, than go to London and have the hassle of transfers, Heathrow etc just to get a wider cabin and a PTV.
There will be disappointment, but, if that is kept to a few people, then there is no reason why a 757 on this route cannot be sucess.
And as Sandy says, you have to trust the management and hope that they know what they’re doing. The proof isn’t in what ‘we’ think, its what the general public think and a good proportion of them really won’t mind that much that they’d book elsewhere.
Some interesting points here.
As an aviation freak, I’d be disappointed if I got changed onto a 757 trans-pond rather than an A330.
However, most passengers aren’t aviation fans.
Those disappointed will likely be regular BMI long haul travellers who are used to the product. Your average ad-hoc business traveller and leisure traveller might not actually mind that much because they don’t travel BMI long haul that often and don’t have the comparison to make. The fact remains that BMI are the only airline offering direct services to Washington from Manchester and the North of England; a high proportion of people would still rather travel direct from Manchester on a 757, than go to London and have the hassle of transfers, Heathrow etc just to get a wider cabin and a PTV.
There will be disappointment, but, if that is kept to a few people, then there is no reason why a 757 on this route cannot be sucess.
And as Sandy says, you have to trust the management and hope that they know what they’re doing. The proof isn’t in what ‘we’ think, its what the general public think and a good proportion of them really won’t mind that much that they’d book elsewhere.
Chris, what was CE doing up at NCL? 🙂
Chris, what was CE doing up at NCL? 🙂
You learn something new every day – thanks Mark. 🙂
You learn something new every day – thanks Mark. 🙂
Is this US196 we are talking about?
Strange quirk, and I’m sure a mistake, but Ceefax have been reporting US196 as being a Las Vegas arrival at Manchester and not a Philadelphia arrival.
Am I missing something?
Nice to see a 762 I’m sure, but not a patch on the 330! 😉
Is this US196 we are talking about?
Strange quirk, and I’m sure a mistake, but Ceefax have been reporting US196 as being a Las Vegas arrival at Manchester and not a Philadelphia arrival.
Am I missing something?
Nice to see a 762 I’m sure, but not a patch on the 330! 😉
Thanks guys.
Thanks guys.
And presumably that frees up the 738 to go elsewhere.
Anyone got any SCY752 experiences they can tell me about?