dark light

Scouse

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 496 through 510 (of 725 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Your chance to see a comet in the sky #1924233
    Scouse
    Participant

    it’s a naked-eye object even from a well-lit suburb. Draw a line from the Pole Star to the Pleiades, and then search about half-way along with a pair of moderate-power bincoluars such as 7×50, and you should find it easily enough. Pretty well exactly overhead at midnight, btw.

    in reply to: Blohm und Voss flying boats #1303678
    Scouse
    Participant

    Am I right in thinking that the only B&V aircaft of any type still extant is the Bf109-derived Bv155 in storage in the US?

    in reply to: aircraft undercarrige design #1306888
    Scouse
    Participant

    When I worked at BAC in the early 70s there were many who spoke in hushed tones about the TSR-2 undercarraige. The general consensus was that it was an engineering nightmare and had TSR-2 gone into full operational service a major redesign may have been called for. From memory, the retraction sequence depended on a whole chain of microswitches working as they should…only they didn’t.
    Can anyone throw a bit more light on this?

    in reply to: Typhoon T.1 display – RAF Waddington – 17th Oct 07 #521191
    Scouse
    Participant

    Nice to see a Tiffie that looks all dirty and used:

    I was thinking the same thing myself.
    Anyone know what causes the dark near-circular patches on the underside of the wing by the undercarraige doors?

    in reply to: Small accident at LHR #585468
    Scouse
    Participant

    Wait for the Daily Mail tommorow….

    ‘Terror For Passengers As Planes Collide At Heathrow!’

    😀 :diablo:

    You’re probably right. Let’s see….

    in reply to: Spotted #1245088
    Scouse
    Participant

    Anyone know owt about the P-51 that flew over Widnes approx 12.35 on Sunday heading due south?

    in reply to: VC10 what a great jet! #450643
    Scouse
    Participant

    Si, couldn’t you have tilted the camera up a bit for the Liverpool picture? Reckon even a couple of extra pixels at the top right would have got my house in the shot!
    Seriously, great pictures.

    William

    in reply to: Ultra-Low at Airshow #1254577
    Scouse
    Participant

    The Airbus in the forest incident was back in 1988 at Mulhouse when an A320flyby went horribly wrong;

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_EM0hDchVlY

    It is one of the great miracles of aviation that only three people died in the accident. There is a summary of the accident report at

    http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19880626-0

    but there have been allegations of dishonesty and cover-ups in the manner in which the accident was investigated. I am not in any position to offer any comment on these, which probably need to be batted back to the commercial aviation forum anyway.

    Going back to the Portuguese incident, or near-incident, the A310 does not have full fly-by-wire so the pilot would not have the comfort zone – if that’s the right phrase – of being able to push the aircraft to the edge of its performance envelope under full control. Or what would seem like full control.

    I can’t work out whether that makes it scarier or not. As other posters have said, you can have all the idiot-proof FBW in the world and it still won’t rescue you from the laws of physics, birdstrike, wind shear, you name it. He’d eaten right into his margins and got away with it. The next time may be different…

    in reply to: Which Farnborough? #1257395
    Scouse
    Participant

    As soon as I can crowbar oldest son from the main computer I’ll post a few more from the 60s and 70s. Meanwhile I’ll put a few thoughts about used scanners on the photgraphic section.
    I’ve done a bit more Googling and F-BMCY is the same airframe that’s now doubling up as a garden shed somewhere near Sumburgh.
    My first full-time job as at Filton and I remember seeing her in the hangar after the u/c collapse, and the slot in the fuselage where the detatched prop blade had penetrated the skin. Apparently the blade had transfixed a seat cushion while leaving the occupant of the seat physically unscathed, but no doubt a gibbering wreck. I’m not a nervous flyer, but I have avoided sitting in line with the propeller arc ever since seeing that Potez.
    I’ve checked against the scramble.nl site and the Farnborough pix can only be the 61 show. Many thanks Mark 12 for pointing me towards it.

    William

    in reply to: Cosford Today Sept 07' #1267427
    Scouse
    Participant

    Good day out, isn’t it? Took my son and his girlfriend earlier this year – they’re both 16, greener-than-thou and pacifists to their fingertips, yet they were both absolutetly fascinated by what they saw with an intelligent appreciation of what it is all about and what it meant in an earlier era.

    in reply to: Jumping the gun at Liverpool #496576
    Scouse
    Participant
    in reply to: Jumping the gun at Liverpool #497234
    Scouse
    Participant

    I’m inclined to agree with Newforest and Ren Frew, but the one thing that still niggles is that Flyglobespan announced back at the beginning of July that the JFK route was being dropped at the end of October.
    The press release http://www.uk-airport-news.info/liverpool-airport-news-040707.htm has Flyglobespan promising a summer service next year and the LPL management “confident that the link will be restored”.
    The Liverpool Daily Post, who travel pages have been advertising the NY packages using winter schedules (my italics) right up to last week, has hinted that talks with other potential operators are/have been taking place.
    All we can do is watch this space, I suppose.

    in reply to: Jumo engine 211J #1296670
    Scouse
    Participant

    At the risk of showing you something you may have already come across, how about this:

    http://www.geocities.com/hjunkers/ju_jumo211_a1.htm

    William

    in reply to: Help, my camera has a bug (it's not what you think) #453383
    Scouse
    Participant

    I had a similar experince with my OM2 20-odd years back and they went of their own accord. PMN’s probably right. OM2 still working BTW.
    Actually spotted the little blighters on the press day at Farnborough. Guy from General Dynamics spotted my consternation and had a look…there’s something about the phrase “Sir, you’ve got bugs..” that just rolls around with a deep southern US accent!

    in reply to: Bristol Siddeley Turbofans? #1303144
    Scouse
    Participant

    Nailed it…according to Bill Gunston’s history of Rolls-Royce engines, RR designed and built a reheat installation for a Conway in January 1959 as potential TFX engine for the US.
    It was put together in a week (!) and at first gave a boost of 27.3%, rising to 47.5% a few days later.

Viewing 15 posts - 496 through 510 (of 725 total)