dark light

setter

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 886 through 900 (of 1,104 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Anson Survivors (Zombie from 2004) #1364042
    setter
    Participant

    Melvyn

    With all due respect – certain forum members are expecting you to be nailing curly bits of metal on your pensioner aircraft not discussing the relative merits of whose is bigger than another. Please return to your aeroplane and report back from angels five – over

    Regards
    John P

    PS some shots of you and said aircraft including an Australian downunder view of the 65th birthday celebration!!!

    in reply to: Concorde Petition to Blair #1364087
    setter
    Participant

    Hi

    I saw a lot of Vulcans in the last few weeks (one of my favourites) and whilst the East Fortune one is better than others which are outside they are all in a state of decay to some extent and need to come inside. Whilst at East Fortune the staff seemed to hope that the plan was to eventually house this and the Comet inside which is the desired outcome. An issue with Vulcans seems to be the steel exhaust jetpipes which corrode and then weaken the surrounding structures particularly badly for some reason – worse than on a Victor for instance – I think it must be the specification of the steel used.

    The Newark example has one pipe nearly eaten away and despite the best efforts of all concerned will be an ongoing source of concern until/if it gets housed under cover.

    Based upon what I have seen in the UK over the past month I have real concern for the majority of large aircraft displayed outside in the long term and I definately feel that they will steadily decline in numbers as time goes by.

    Perhaps a solution would be to dismantle some of the better/more signifigant aircraft and kill off the corrosion and store them until a better home can be found – the facts are that some of the Vulcans will go but Shackletons and Victors as well as Hastings etc are too rare and need to be protected somehow. The Concorde money showed that there is finance available it is a question of tapping into it somehow?

    Kindest regards
    John P

    in reply to: Concorde Petition to Blair #1366126
    setter
    Participant

    Hi

    In for a penny – in for a pound

    One aspect of this is the economic part of the business case for putting a Concorde in East Fortune.

    I realise that the numbers of visitors to east fortune have gone up as a result of the arrival of Concorde – I believe it is 50% or some say double (100%) but either way that is impressive.

    One argument put forward for the Concorde going to east Fortune is that it will attract crowds.

    The following are points that should be looked into in any case not just this one so don’t think I am just singling out poor old EF here (Which I visit as often as I can but Aus is a long way!)

    1) Will the anticipated/achieved increase in numbers/takings equate to the cost of moving/ assembling and maintaining the Concorde to EF as well as the possible future cost of new accomodation if this is deemed possible. If it does when is the probable break even date. (I know it is a grant but it is all public money). Would this have been achievable just by directly investing the funds into improvements/restorations and other less costly aquisitions.

    2) What is the budget for ongoing Concorde maintaince / facilities costs (Power, cleaning etc) – is that being factored in as an additional cost.

    3) Is there a program plan for the whole site with individual project plans for each component of the plan complete with costings and priority determination based upon the required goals.

    4) What is the governance model for the site who is responsible to whom , What is the Strategic plan they are working to,who makes decisions and on what advice from whom. What is the compliance assurance process.

    At present the perception, based on published material, is that a decision was made that the Concorde was placed there because it will pull crowds much as the Vulcan used to. The issue here is that East Fortune – great Museum it may be will not draw significantly greater crowds in the future just because of Concorde when there are the numbers of them down south. Once the locals have all seen it numbers will taper off and the cost of operation of the exhibit could become cost negative in the longer run given the ongoing investment and this will consequently result in less available resourcing for the other exhibits and priorities like further amenity improvements and restoration.

    Again this is not a go at EF just a logical point of view for discussion about any large facility and could just as easily apply to Duxford etc.

    Regards
    John P

    in reply to: Concorde Petition to Blair #1367474
    setter
    Participant

    Ian

    Whatever
    John

    in reply to: Concorde Petition to Blair #1367499
    setter
    Participant

    Hi

    I can’t have been in the same place then – it is best just to differ on this and move on and I had lunch with the guys off site as I was invited several months ago. I don’t need to have an issue over this it is a difference of opinion that’s all

    Regards
    John P

    in reply to: Concorde Petition to Blair #1367684
    setter
    Participant

    Hi

    Perhaps someone should convey this to the tour staff who show visitors around the hangers and the somewhat distraught workers with whom I recently had lunch!!!. Aeroplane Monthly reporters who were also told similar information – Most of the aircraft in which I am interested (Beaufighter and Bolingbroke etc) are sitting in hangers (leaking on the day I was there) not having been worked on since the last time I was there a year ago.

    I am not saying you are wrong but communication there is obviously a problem if nothing else!!!!

    Kindest regards
    John Parker

    in reply to: Concorde Petition to Blair #1367919
    setter
    Participant

    Hi

    Couldn’t agree more with all of this

    On my world tour of UK Aviation sites part 2 I spent a whole day at East Fortune and I can tell you the staff are not happy campers!!! especially the restoration chaps who have been asked not to come to work for a few years !!!!

    That is one Concord that will definately never fly again as to add insult to injury they CUT the wings off to move her!!!! Looks really rough job – no wonder it is taking so long to put her back together. Would have made a really nice diving reef !!!

    Regards
    John P

    in reply to: Hawker Hart family survivors #1367925
    setter
    Participant

    Hi

    There are quite a few remaining airframe components in NZ and Aus not mentioned here. Jack McDonald has a project that was fairly advanced to getting a Demon flying here in Brisbane area but is currently”resting” at Caboolture till someone finishes it off and there are other parts scattered about various collections here – nearly all Demons as this was the only variant operated here.

    In Kiwi land there are many caches of parts including an Audex that I have seen in my travels which I can’t understand as I don’t believe they ever had any.

    A comprehensive audit worldwide would be a good project for someone.

    Regards
    John P

    in reply to: Hawker Sea Fury. #1371691
    setter
    Participant

    Hi

    Having folding wings doesn’t rule an aircraft out of coming from Iraq as some of the machines sent there were remanufactured from Sea Fury’s and two that came to Aus definately had folding wings already.

    John P

    in reply to: Aussie Firefly #1373489
    setter
    Participant

    Hi Oscar

    No I can’t stand secrets either but the guy asked me to keep my mouth shut and I am respecting his confidence as I hope I would for you so thats the way it goes. Rest assured the outcome – if true – is a good one and I am sure you will be happy with it as will we all.

    I really understand how irritating this is but you have to respect their wishes – I hope you understand
    Regards
    John P

    PS

    PM your phone Number so I can talk to you about Vietnam.

    in reply to: Aussie Firefly #1374554
    setter
    Participant

    Hi

    I was told a few weeks back that it is moving and will be operated and /or maintained by a third party on behalf of the RANHF. I was asked not to disclose who etc till it becomes public – hope it is true as it will be nice to see her in the air again.

    Regards
    John P

    in reply to: Flying Heritage Collection #1376415
    setter
    Participant

    Hi

    If his restorations were as reliable as Winduz there would be smoking holes all over Washington state – you can’t reboot a 262 when it quits on you!!

    Regards
    JP

    in reply to: Anson Survivors (Zombie from 2004) #1376437
    setter
    Participant

    Hi

    There are many Anson remains here in Australia and several have been or are being restored. We had hundreds of the buggers and a lot survived on farms to be collected later by restorers a lot of damage happens in our climate to the woodwork but much is still left to be restored.

    Regards
    John P

    in reply to: aircraft fans east yorkshire #1376444
    setter
    Participant

    Hi

    One happy Australian has just secured an F111 for Warbird use – perhaps this is a little much for you to statrt with.

    Seriously I would think the best course of action would be to take James advice and consult a group – perhaps even help out with their projects while you learn the ropes and then take on your own.

    Regards
    John P

    in reply to: It's a mystery… #1376476
    setter
    Participant

    Hi

    You are not fooling me

    It’s a specially modified Bristol Centaurus used exclusively in the production of vegamite in the Kraft factory in Brisbane – The use of these explains the shortage of such powerplants in the USA because we love our Vegamite the engines bring premium prices here and the props are spun to keep the flies off the vats of delicous black stuff – five blades are better than 4

    Prize may be forwarded to me in Gold soverigns thanks

    JP

Viewing 15 posts - 886 through 900 (of 1,104 total)