dark light

Maple 01

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 411 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Stirling Project Update #923567
    Maple 01
    Participant

    Someone’s forging Stirlings? Whatever next? Fake Hampdens?

    in reply to: RAF Museum Senior Management Team #860074
    Maple 01
    Participant

    I went to Hendon for the first time in 20 years last week, seeing some of the aircraft was like meeting up with old friends and the Grahame-White Factory was well done. The only disapointment was that the buildings looked so run-down and most of the anamatronic stuff was broken……perhaps a few quid on painting and decorating might be in order?

    Maple 01
    Participant

    Unaccustomed as I am to posting here…….I’m a bit perturbed by the whiff of schoolmarmism I’m getting, as ex-mob, though not the vintage of the BofB crowd, I’d expect to see a bit of the spirit of the RAF here i.e. banter, going off at tangents and light taking of the pi….. in the finest traditions of the service, as well as the well informed comments – let’s not lose our senses of humour……

    Anyway, everyone knows the key element to winning the BofB was the NAAFI waggon.

    in reply to: Why Have We Heard of the Boulton-Paul Overstrand? #884931
    Maple 01
    Participant

    How very dare you sir!? The Overstrand was the pinnacle of bespoke gentlemen’s flying provided by those good ol’ Nooorrrflk bouys Boulton Paul from Mousehold Heath, don u be sain naffn rong ’bout dem, Thems Norfolk n good!

    in reply to: Aircraft names #885083
    Maple 01
    Participant

    Boulton Paul named two bombers after small villages on the North Norfolk coast – Overstrand and Sidestrad of course – to say they are one-horse towns would be a lie, they share a horse betwen them and even then it’s only rented, and stuffed.

    God knows what they were thinking of…….just sorry the BP Six Mile Bottom never caught on

    in reply to: Jumo 004 running for first time in about 60 years! #893059
    Maple 01
    Participant

    Interesting……now only 24 hours and 55 mins before a complete overhaul and rebuild required 😉

    in reply to: What if Germany continued the blitz? #910084
    Maple 01
    Participant

    Same old same old, nearly as good as the forum member that ‘what iffed’ the channel was mysteriously drained during the BoB.

    German forces weren’t ten feet tall, by 1943 they were on their arses, prior to that the Luftwaffe post BoB was in a shocking state, pilot training got shorter and shorter, the number of high scoring stars that some are so enamoured of these days were dwindling, aircraft types were becoming more and more obsolete, and the wonder weapons weren’t as good as the propaganda would have you believe. This spiralled further down as the years progressed.

    Meanwhile the RAF was getting stronger, better and improved weapons and aircraft, training times expanded.
    Re-run of the Battle of Britain?

    Wargame it and see if the Luftwaffe ever win without the intervention of space aliens or the wishful thinking of those who see all things Nazi as ‘cool’

    in reply to: DH Comet retirement, 1980. #925478
    Maple 01
    Participant

    or 0/400s

    in reply to: Warsaw Pact – Order of Battle during the Cold War #925641
    Maple 01
    Participant

    Hi Galcom.

    Any time period would be good, I had dealings with both in the late eighties but it would be investing to see how they developed

    Regards

    in reply to: Warsaw Pact – Order of Battle during the Cold War #926046
    Maple 01
    Participant

    Thanks, very interesting, anything on GSFG or Air Army Legnitsa (sp?)

    in reply to: Time to clean the Beaufighter #863749
    Maple 01
    Participant

    Very nice,

    I can see the ad campain now

    ‘Take two bottles into the hangar?
    ‘I just want to wash my Beau and go’

    in reply to: B-29 Superfortresses used over Europe in WW2 #887308
    Maple 01
    Participant

    Why would the B-29 not be able to drop Tallboys from above 18,000ft?
    It had a service ceiling of 33,600ft

    If you meant Grand Slams

    Because with a 44,000lb bomb load (two Grand Slams) it would never make 33,600ft

    in reply to: B-29 Superfortresses used over Europe in WW2 #887613
    Maple 01
    Participant

    I know some amazing modifications result from war, carrying two Tallboys is incredible, but two Grand Slams…

    The other thing to consider is the safety height to drop the things…..two Grand Slams would mean the B-29 would struggle to be outside the blast wave and either option, dropping one at a time or in salvo, I think would be equally problematic, a good chance that the pressure wave from one bomb wold trigger an explosion of the other, or the effect of dropping one on its own or two at the same time could cause the shock wave to destroy the aircraft.
    A quick search of tinterweb gives a safe drop height of a Tallboy as 18,000ft, so I’m guessing a bit more for a Grand Slam

    in reply to: P-61 opinions #891298
    Maple 01
    Participant

    As I heard the old one about the mosquito feathering one engine, flipping on its back and accelerating away….:)

    in reply to: Harvard AJ841 #893818
    Maple 01
    Participant

    I think someone here has said that SOC dates were somtimes just a bit of admin, and that the aircraft could have been dumped a while before, this might not be the case post-war though – unit F540 might help

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 411 total)