I don’t see how religion and crappy Iranian knock offs of 1970s technology has anything to do with Iraq.
Though for Iraq, AH-1 Cobra could be sufficient for internal duties.
But then you can get upgraded Cobras a lot more easily from Uncle Sam, including new build AH-1Z Vipers as used by USMC.
The last thing you want to be is being dependent on the Americans :rolleyes: Who knows, maybe one day soon the American people will start the American Spring π
Toufan II is more than adequate for Iraqi needs. In the next few years Toufan III could be an Apache like helicopter coming out of DIO π
Toufan II demonstrating its helmet slaved targeting http://theaviationist.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Toufan-2.jpg
did you know most of the world’s aviation people are Jewish?
Sikorsky, Dassault and MiG? but they were more science than religion.
Did you know Zadeh was Iranian? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lotfi_A._Zadeh
Religion is a tradition and way of life that brings the good out of people. The fundamental principals of society, such as thou shalt not kill, thou shalt not steal, came right out of religion.
yes i agree. science and technology are fundamental.
what you dont understand isiran is a theocracy. they value religion over science. so they rather spend more time on funding religion than science because science is usually the enemy of religion.
israel is a secular democracy. they value science and bargains. thus they are more willing to sponsor science.
thats why Israel can make these which are powered by the achievements of science
and why Iran makes these, which rely on the power of religion and faith to make airborne
Science and religion go hand in hand. Science cannot explain God. Many scientists are extremely religious. Einstein was deeply religious as were most of the biggest names during the Renaissance and Enlightenment.
Read up on Newton’s religious views http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton%27s_religious_views
Indeed, not long after religion was born tens of thousands of years ago, man created science in an attempt to explain God. Currently, physicists continue to search for the so called God particle.
Lavi was based on F-16. It wasn’t considered a new design. Don’t count the Qaher out just yet. China took about 20 years before making J-10 work. In the mean time, enjoy Iran’s hovercraft http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-e7y4yOFHSg
Iran’s new Zulfiqar 3 and Samsam (upgraded M-60A1) tanks are terrific http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvgvB0vO7Vk
Israel is not a theocracy your rant is moot.
Whether Iran is a theocracy or not has no relevance to its defense industry :rolleyes: Anyone with at least the brain of a cockroach understands, whether they believe in God or not, that science and technology are fundamental to weapons which are the most important to winning wars π
Iran values theology over science. of course you’ll have graduate students if they go to theology schools.
case in point. Iran’s leader studied religion in college. israel’s leader studied architecture and political science at MIT.
most people consider religion a mickey mouse course.
Judaism is also a religion. Religion has nothing to do with engineering and weapons. No religion in the world denies the fact that science and technology are important for weapons and war. Also, action speaks louder than words. If Israel thinks it can make an air strike on Iran, then it is welcome to try.
Israel is not a race. it is a country that values education. Israel has Jews, Arabs, Ethiopians, and Marvins.
And how exactly doesn’t Iran value education? :rolleyes:
Over 35,000 in the defense sector. About a third of them university graduates. Iran also has thousands of graduate students studying engineering in the West.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_Industries_Organization
Israel is 75% Jewish, but it has the Star of David on its flag and is internationally recognized as the Jewish state. Could be different when Arabs make up 50% of Israel’s population.
if Iran is over 79 times bigger than Israel..
Israel is then 90x smarter than Iran. that simple.
racism much? :rolleyes:
Mi-28N is the 4th most capable attack helicopter in the world
Toufan maybe 20th, certainly behind the top light attack helicopters which are Tigre, Turkey Mongoose, and Super Cobra. and definitely far behind the heavy ones.
Toufan II may be not the best. That’s not the point. The point is it’s good enough for Iraq’s national defense. Don’t forget, it was Sadr’s Mahdi Army trained and armed by Iran that inflicted just about nearly one third casualty rate on the US forces in Iraq by the time the US forces were completely driven out of Iraq π
I hear it’s not real π
“Though in my opinion Iranian Toufan II is a better choice, more technologically advanced and less costly for maintenance.”
I loled.
“A little off topic but Iran’s new Zulfiqar 3 tank is reverse engineered from one of Iraq’s M1A1 tanks delivered to Iran.”
I loled even harder.
Iran is over 79 times the size of Israel and has nearly 10 times the population. Israel can make top notch weapons like Arrow and Greenpine, Merkava 4, Trophy, Lavi (based on F-16), Phalcon, well so can Iran π
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_equipment_of_Israel
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_Industries_Organization
Iran can fly arms because no one is stopping. If Jordan/Israel/Saudi or Turkey decide they can easily intercept it in Iraqi aerospace. Iran airforce is short range and obsolete
China is far away, still dependent on Oil/ suze canal and may not take strong stand. Russia $700b rearmament programe is going to have big impact on Middleast that is big protection for countries. China is still spending money in learning. It has no reliable transport and gunship choppers. no modern trainer aircraft for building new airforce. Light weight JF-17/J-10 still lacks carrying strike weopons on scale of MIG-29M. I havenβt seen any heavy jamming pods integrated into Chinese aircraft. There is lack of reliable engines for tanks. See Russian/UKranian tanks/engines export to hot countries and compare it to China.
I beg to differ. Any Jordanian/Israeli/Saudi or Turkish plane entering Iraqi airspace would get shot down by Mahdi Army air defense. Don’t forget it was the Mahdi Army that drove the Americans and British out of Iraq π
US casualty was nearly a third of total troops by the time withdrawal from Iraq was complete http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_War
The point is all these countries will not stand with Iraq. for example when Iraq starting using those Mi-28s in Anbar province or against kurds. there will be reaction like in Syria. China does not have operational carrier or bases nearby to help Iraq in trouble. when dealing with RSAF or Turkish airforce. Iraki politicians are slowly realizing it.
http://en.aswataliraq.info/(S(2z1qgmriu4wtie55nsgougeq))/Default.aspx?page=article_page&c=slideshow&id=152830
Iran can send arms to Syria by planes. China can surely project air power to the Middle East. China has air bases in East Turkestan which is bigger than Iran and very close to Iran. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xinjiang
Any idea what kind of air defence systems the iraqi committee saw in France, long range or short range ?
And yeah Goldust is in the wrong thread. π
Who needs French air defense? Mersad (reverse engineered MIM-23B) and Ra’ad (reverse engineered Buk-M2 from Syria) and Ya Zahra (reverse engineered Crotale) are the way to go.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ca3llxzR0U4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbkWdJE3ZNU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulXtXoM_A5Y
Very soon Iran reverse engineers TOR M1 which has phased array radar and VLS.
won’t happen. If a “violent takeover” happens in Iraq it will be by the Army… and Ali Ghaidan / Othman Ghanimi and co are 100% in the “USA” camp… You didn’t think the americans were going to leave without leaving some “claymores” behind?
Sadr has his own army called the Mahdi army which is currently involved with Syria and he has his own political movement called the Sadrist movement.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahdi_Army
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sadrist_Movement
The Mahdi army, using 500,000 soldiers, can surprise and defeat the Iraqi army. Mahdi soldiers are trained in Iran and they use Iranian weapons such as G3 and KH2002 and S.5’56 battle rifles, Nakhjir sniper rifles, Shaher and Arash anti material rifles, Misagh-2 MANPADs, Dehalvieh anti armor missiles etc. The Mahdi army is more powerful than the Iraqi army just as Hezbollah is more powerful than the Lebanese army.
Currently, the Maliki Shiite government is already allied with the Syrian Sunni government and enables Iran to deliver weapons and fighters to Syria by way of Iraq, and Americans can’t do a thing about it.
Back to the topic, I thought Iraq was ordering Mi-28 a few months ago. What happened to it? :confused:
http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/iraq-orders-mi-28-attack-helicopters-377547/
Personally, Toufan II (Cobra family) and Dehlavieh (Kornet family) is the best choice π
Iraq will certainly be “shifting” away from the US… but not by THAT much… not many people have a first hand experience of being on the “wrong side” of the USA as much as the Iraqis! They’ll try to make a balance by giving just enough political/economic “nuggets” to all the “power blocks” in the area…
If Sadr ousts Maliki and establishes an Islamic government in Iraq, you can bet Iraq will fully ally with Iran. Muslims are not afraid to die because they believe in afterlife. Americans cannot ever scare Muslims.