very good load. can carry 3 heavy fuel tank, 8 bombs and 2 missiles
this oen has 4 big missiles 2 air missiles one fuel tank.
J-10 has something like five center pylons.
The presence of what appears to be an afterburner on recent images of Chinese UCAV have led some to speculate that the aircraft is intended to include a supersonic attack profile. So far as I am aware this is an approach as yet unexplored in American and European UCAV programs and is therefore well within the purview of this thread as representing a distinctively Chinese way of war.
CJ-10 strikes would hurt a lot more compared to UCAV strikes.
china will begin retire j7 this year. it was remove from front line service last year but now all service this year. will be replace by j10 not jf17.
replaced by J-10B?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]216434[/ATTACH]
Actually it reminds me of an enlarged Sea Dart with the intakes on the wrong side.
It’s F-22 that has its intakes on the wrong side.
Oh please.
They copied what they hope will work.
Maybe, maybe not. So what if they did? J-20 looks more dangerous 😎
J-20 uses DSI. In fact, JF-17 is the first operational jet using DSI. J-20 uses lateral intakes whereas PAK-FA uses underside intakes ala Flankers. In terms of design, J-20 is most likely more advanced.
I think it’d be smarter to provide spares for existing Mi-25/-35 fleet than introducing a new type that requires crew training and logistics systems. After all Syrian government requires full combat capable aircraft now and can’t afford to wait.
The Syrian AF are running out of operational airframes. A list of claimed losses – a number have been confirmed. Further aircraft have been lost with overrunning of several Syrian airbases including quite useful L-39ZA.
http://www.ejection-history.org.uk/CONFLICTS/SYRIA_2011_2012/Syrian_Conflict.htm
Also there are reports that Syrian AF sortie rates are down due to attrition and fuel and spare shortages.
Russia has delivered plenty of repair equipment for the Syrian air force to remain operational till at least election time next year. Although by now the most devastating arsenal of Assad’s forces is artillery, which the Syrian defense industry is able to manufacture by itself. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eZGUWZQpOI
“In the absence of sanctions, we are continuing to fulfill our contract obligations,” Isaikin said at a news conference. “But these aren’t offensive weapons. We are mostly shipping air defense systems and repair equipment intended for various branches of the military.”
40 Mi-28 choppers + 40 Toufan II choppers. Best package for the bucks.
Though Russia cannot supply offensive weapons to Syria at the moment due to violence, Russia CAN supply Mi-28 attack helicopters to Shia controlled Iraq which can in turn deliver these offensive weapons to Shia controlled Syria. This is what I call playing it smart.
The F-15 and the F-22 are built by different companies.
The J-10 and J-20 are built by the same company, CAC.
CAC is a local branch of AVIC
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_Aviation_Industry_Corporation_I
China’s problem is the same as Japan had,
they can’t get oil once an easily done blockade is in place
Is it me, or does J-20 carry RVV-AE Adder in its side weapons bay?
Enough with this Iran ranting.
It now looks like this deal is signed and Iraq will get 40 Mi-28N among other equipment.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sau1VuCRZjA
http://www.ruaviation.com/news/2013/4/2/1609/
I wonder how Rosobouro feels about “US Observers” getting a peek show at their latest hardware..
Good for Iraq. The sooner it gets out of dependency on the US, the better 😎
France has been designing aircraft for over 100 years (do the names Breguet, Bleriot or Farman mean anything?).
Iran has been designing aircraft for 0 (putting twin tails on an F-5E does not count and neither does making a mock up).
Keeping an F-14 flying is a lot different to designing and then manufacturing working aircraft – just ask the Indians with their population of 1 billion and who have been designing and aircraft since 1950s and whose first aircraft were licence produced in WWII).
Why is that talking to fans of Iran is always like talking to 6 year olds?
It takes a few engineers to design a plane. Dassault itself employs about 100 engineers, tops. Also, Iran has been designing planes since the 1990s at least.
Huh?
Countries like India are struggling with something as basic as the LCA Tejas. Other countries ala South Korea require extensive expertise from an established manufacturer to build a supersonic trainer.
And both India and South Korea have either built domestic aircraft (HF24 Marut, Kiran) or licence produced foreign ones (MiG-21bis, Jaguar, Su-30MKI, Gnat/Ajeet, F-5E/F, F-16C/D, chunks of F-15).
Yet Iran “will catch up soon”. 😮
A plane is not difficult to make. France has 65 million population and makes excellent planes. Iran has 75 million population, has thousands of graduate student in the West transferring know how back to Iran, and has working examples such as F-4, F-14, MiG-29 to work with 😎
I suspect going for Russian Mi-35 or Mi-28s is a far more sensible option for Iraq. Mi-35 is probably the best bang-for-buck gunship you can get with a useful multirole capability.
And just cause it looks like an AH-64 doesn’t make it an AH-64.
Just like putting twin tails on 5 F-5Es and then painting them in Blue Angels colours does not make them F/A-18 equivalent. :diablo:
Baby steps. Aircraft technology hasn’t really progressed since the 1950s, just as gun technology hasn’t really progressed in the early 1900s. One day soon Iran will catch up. And I mean SOON 😎
Iran’s new laser guided anti armor missile http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXRTE8lG5Vw