dark light

Goldust

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 474 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: PAKFA and Silent Eagle comparison #2232892
    Goldust
    Participant

    Su-50 is the plane equivalent of Yasen. You don’t want to mess with Su-50. 😎

    in reply to: Boeing loses South Korean Fighter contract #2232923
    Goldust
    Participant

    If Typhoon wins then I can see American influence in east Asia slipping away for good. :dev2: Go Typhoon!

    in reply to: Boeing loses South Korean Fighter contract #2232929
    Goldust
    Participant

    DSI, the most elegant part of a fuselage. – Aristotle

    in reply to: Boeing loses South Korean Fighter contract #2232961
    Goldust
    Participant

    South Korea has about 1% the territory of China (not counting South Tibet and Taiwan). If South Korea has room to field 60 more war jets, then China has room to field 600 more war jets. :eagerness:

    in reply to: Boeing loses South Korean Fighter contract #2233020
    Goldust
    Participant

    Oh you got a picture.. How sweet.
    Now can you finally post any solid data?

    ????? Who cares? I am talking about J-10B now

    Why should I care about solid data, which is not available anyhow? Fact is, AESA is the most advanced type of radar in the world, and J-10B has AESA. It’s like saying oh Toyota engine has 5 more hp than Honda engine or vice versa. It makes no difference in the big picture.

    in reply to: Boeing loses South Korean Fighter contract #2233023
    Goldust
    Participant

    Korea wants the F-35.

    That’s because SK isn’t allowed J-10B. :applause:

    in reply to: Boeing loses South Korean Fighter contract #2233039
    Goldust
    Participant

    If J-10B is in the competition, SK would go for J-10B. China is an enemy of SK, so it won’t happen. :eagerness:

    in reply to: Boeing loses South Korean Fighter contract #2233536
    Goldust
    Participant

    J-10B AESA front view

    http://forum.net.hr/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Discussions.Components.Files/16/4162.J10B_5F00_AESA_5F00_RADAR_5F00_1.jpg

    http://img822.imageshack.us/img822/1206/j10bradar.jpg

    Type 052D uses four AESA, and is the most technologically advanced warship in the world.

    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Vx2MKZxX5c8/Uh_-BBI28VI/AAAAAAAAdME/OVtT5Cl4Vio/s1600/0Type+052D+Class+Guided+Missile+Destroyer+Starts+Its+First+Sea+Trial+export+pakistan+navy+pla+navy+chinese+missile+antiship+hq-10+hq-9+hq-16+sam+aesa++%282%29.jpg

    in reply to: Boeing loses South Korean Fighter contract #2233602
    Goldust
    Participant

    Tiananmen Square Massacre

    (this is just a test)

    US and China trade relations significantly improved since that day, confirming the US never cares for democracy. :applause:

    in reply to: The conclusion appears to be: we need another big war. #2233604
    Goldust
    Participant

    Nukes are fine – we’ve got to test out whether the Challenger 2’s NBC set up is as good as promised.

    And also see how modern electronics react to massive EMPs – bye bye mobile phones (how I hate you so). 😛

    Challenger 2 would be vaporized.

    in reply to: Boeing loses South Korean Fighter contract #2233608
    Goldust
    Participant

    Because you claim the J-10B is more advanced than F-16E and you don’t even know what is mounted inside.

    I am not asking about AESA or not AESA, but about exact type, designation, T/R module count and capability figures.

    Prove it. And spare me that DSI nonsense.

    Northrop-Grumman AN/AAQ-32 IFTS

    Gracias. It is AESA. All AESA work the same way, no matter where in the world. There are small differences but are mostly negligible. Just as Toyota and Honda engines are not exactly the same, but work in the same way and have very similar performance.

    in reply to: The conclusion appears to be: we need another big war. #2233619
    Goldust
    Participant

    Not with nukes you can’t. Even in Syria it has to be proxy war because Russia and the US cannot fight each other directly. In the case of a big war, tens of thousands of war planes would have to be produced over a short amount of time, as in WW2. This is certainly possible given today’s massive industrial capabilities.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_motor_vehicle_production

    in reply to: Boeing loses South Korean Fighter contract #2233656
    Goldust
    Participant

    What electronic warfare suite does the J-10B have? Who is the producer and what systems are included?

    Why on earth should I care about that? :confused:

    What is the type of J-10B’s radar? How does it compare to AN/APG-80?

    It is AESA type, same as APG-80.

    What is the J-10B’s frontal aspect RCS?

    Smaller than that of an F-16E.

    Now answer me my question, what is the name of F-16E’s IRST? :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Boeing loses South Korean Fighter contract #2233659
    Goldust
    Participant

    F-15SE would have made a good rival with J-15 Flying Shark had it not suddenly died.

    http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=207377&d=1380060783

    in reply to: PAKFA and Silent Eagle comparison #2233676
    Goldust
    Participant

    No one knows the RCS of F-22. LM cannot be trusted with their word. 🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 474 total)