dark light

Miggers

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 156 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Amelia found? but not by the usual suspects! #792784
    Miggers
    Participant

    The full resume from page 1.

    https://earhartsearchpng.com/earhart-lockheed-electra-search-project/

    Makes for some very interesting reading.

    in reply to: 595 Sqn's Martinets,RAF Aberporth,West Wales. #799951
    Miggers
    Participant

    I scoured Spitfire main production lists to see if I could spot anything like the serial in the photo of 7B*J and couldn’t find a serial even close to
    what I thought was “TB376” for a Spit IX or XVI.

    One that I did spot was IX TE433 but no ident.letter,just that it had been with 595.
    I thought that too about the serial positionings,4″ lettering high up near the spine is usually a Vb/early IX trait.
    What do you think Graham,would those XVI you mention in your above post be standard or RV fuselage aircraft?

    From what I’ve seen,RW,SL and TD serialed airframes were usually the “normal” RV fuselaged XVI’s,but you just never know.

    in reply to: 595 Sqn's Martinets,RAF Aberporth,West Wales. #800126
    Miggers
    Participant

    Excellent,thankyou gentlemen.

    Incidentally,this is the only photo I could find of some of the 23 Spits they had on charge at times:

    http://aberporthatc.co.uk/?cat=14

    Possibly the “only”XVI that it’s reckoned they had on charge,failing that it’s an IX coded(obviously)7B*J,serial could be TB376,
    but it’s rather difficult to see clearly.

    in reply to: "Hurricane" – UK trailer unveiled…. #800597
    Miggers
    Participant

    Well,at least it’s not set at RAF Lincoln in the county of “Scamptonshire” with a black Lab called “Bigger” or similar.

    in reply to: Gannet XL471 #803966
    Miggers
    Participant

    Now there’s a shocker.

    I wasn’t even aware she’d been scrapped that long ago.

    Remember seeing Neil display her at Cosford in the mid-ish 80’s and thought how impressive she was as the then last flyer.

    I thought she was sitting somewhere quietly mouldering away at worst,at best that she was tucked up somewhere safe to maybe
    return to the air and display circuit oneday,but scrapped not long after I saw her,well,I never did….

    in reply to: Vampire Tears Up Halfpenny Green Runway #832996
    Miggers
    Participant

    Quite like how the DM mentioned the Vampire’s “powerful engine”……………

    in reply to: Dakota IV control surfaces and paradoor questions #778714
    Miggers
    Participant

    On the BBMF Dak, the door is strapped to the floor in the middle of the cargo area.

    Cheers Piston.

    Wondered where they put it when it’s removed in flight.

    in reply to: Dakota IV control surfaces and paradoor questions #779089
    Miggers
    Participant

    Absolutley brilliant.

    Duly copied and saved.

    Many,many thanks FL.

    in reply to: Dakota IV control surfaces and paradoor questions #779746
    Miggers
    Participant

    The November 1944 edition of the USAAF Handbook – Flight Operating Instructions for the C-47 states the following:

    Parachute Troop Exit Panel

    On some airplanes the inside panel of the forward half of the main cargo door is removable inward and is used as the exit for parachute troops. Four hooks and bungee rings installed on the right-hand side of the fuselage, opposite the main cargo loading door, are provided for stowing the panel while using the exit”

    Whilst the RAF made certain modifications for British Airborne operations (re-positioned static line cable, mats on the cabin floor, masking of external fittings, etc), I can find no evidence of the RAF modifying the jump panel stowage.

    Cheers for that FL.
    I’ve been studying C-47 paradrop vids on Youtube(both original and modern)and couldn’t see anything like the “overhead the doors”
    slide in stowage that our learned collegue above mentions,most panels seem to have been removed prior to take-off or removed
    in flight and stowed as you say,bungee’d to the opposite cabin wall.
    All the original footage doesn’t seem to have any type of masking around the door panel either,modern ones,yes,to the aft of the panel,
    the outer door handles and the main door hinges.

    The pic I have of KK138/S “in action”doesn’t seem to have any masking out either,certainly not on the door hinges,the “S” ident.letter
    runs across the main hinges and is fully visible as is the C-type fuselage roundel.
    Can’t say whether the door handles are masked,there’s a bod just exited the aircraft and is obscuring them.

    in reply to: Dakota IV control surfaces and paradoor questions #779910
    Miggers
    Participant

    The cabin door is actually three doors in one. A double hinge for opening two doors for large cargo, a single left hand hinged passenger access door and then within this door an inner parachute door which is opened from the inside and then slides onwards and up towards the cabin roof allowing it to be opened in flight and not against the slipstream.

    I realised there are actually three doors in one if you will,but the bit about fitting it into a “stowage rack”(so to speak)above the doors
    and sliding it up into it is the part I’m pleased to find out about.

    Thankyou gentlemen for all your help.

    in reply to: Dakota IV control surfaces and paradoor questions #780515
    Miggers
    Participant

    I’d have thought that for a para drop the door would have been taken off on the ground (and for a PTS aircraft left there). My reasoning being that for a para drop the edge of the doorway, hinges, handles and tailwheel leg would be taped up to protect the static lines and parachute canopy. With the tape in place you wouldn’t be able to close the para door back in place.

    Ta.

    in reply to: Dakota IV control surfaces and paradoor questions #780582
    Miggers
    Participant

    Thanks for that Brian.

    Sounds like your door had been given the DC-3 “treatment” I’d say.

    I’ve found a cutaway of a Dak IV(in one of my own reference books no less !!),and the control surfaces are indeed marked as fabric covered,
    but there isn’t any apparatus on the khazi bulk.marked up as “paradoor stowage”(or anwhere else inside the airframe for that matter),so I suppose
    it could have been shoved inside the khazi(hard luck if anyone needed a pee eh?).

    I’ve seen the BBMF Dak get airborne with the door in place and then return with it removed,but I’d be very surprised if they left it
    slithering about on the floor.

    in reply to: 2014 – RNHF Sea Fury incident at Culdrose #923891
    Miggers
    Participant

    Job well done I’d say.

    No wonder our American cousins put P&W’s in ’em though.

    Miggers
    Participant

    Who cares whether it threw a rod or a fit or whether it was running or walking or coughing and farting.

    It certainly sounded rough as he rolled out,but damned well done JR for a bit of superb,daring flying to
    save the kite.I bet it was “squeaky bum time” there.

    Top bloke and a fabulous pilot.

    in reply to: Missing Malaysian Airlines B777 #499258
    Miggers
    Participant

    AT LAST, the home of the chief pilot is being searched. In other words , his computer will be taken with all the information that it contains. 😉

    Which,along with booting the doors in of all company staff on board,would have been done a few
    days ago TBH.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 156 total)