The aircraft took off after midnight and was well over an hour into its flight so about half of the passengers might have been asleep anyway. Even if the pilot altered course and headed in the opposite direction you’d suddenly have the moon on the other side (provided it was there). How many aware passengers that were not asleep would it take to notice that? According to news reports the aircraft changed altitute “drastically” several times. I’ve heard news reports that stated that several hours after the aircraft was reported missing, people tried to contact their relatives by their mobile phones – and they even rang! I believe that this has been denied since though, I’m not sure. However this gave me the vision of luggage-cases floating on the sea with a phone inside it ringing. If the aircraft was still in the air then, why didn’t passengers hear their phones ringing?
Would it be possible for changes in alitude and course of direction taking place unnoticed by 230 passengers (well at least those that were still awake) for seven hours? It would have been daylight after these seven hours had passed. Surely the aircraft would have been expected to have been over land by then. Apparently it wasn’t.
My wife asked the same questions to me and I also gave her pretty much this answer too.
If,if the flightdeck crew had the idea of what they were going to do,is it possible that the entire
flightcrew were also in on it too?
The attendants closing window blinds,making sure everyone was comfortable and resting,
the pilots even reassuring passengers over the tannoy that all the changes of altitude and
direction were under instruction from ATC and that all was well ?????
Maybe fanciful ideas,maybe not.
I think I’d be checking out(someone probably already is)all the remote airfields capable of
taking and hiding a 777.
By the time the a/c had been aloft for five or six hours it would’ve been a lot lighter than
TOW and from what I’ve seen on YouTube,a 777 can be landed and stopped
pretty smartly when required.
Very low altitude,keeping out to sea and away from busy airfields and other restricted/controlled
airspace ?
If the statement about a member of the flight crew having a computer based flightsim 777 ‘pit
in his home is correct, then surely he could practice his actions and route right down to his
secret landing destination with reasonable accuracy?
I’ll bet there’s some flightsim “pilots” out there doing just that right now.
TOW,fuel burn,landing weights and LDA for various set-ups are hardly secret information surely?
There is a 310 that passes over my house every day(Staffs/Cheshire borders) at about
1000′ AGL either heading northwest toward North Wales/Liverpool area or heading back
southeast.
This accident at Harwarden seems too much of a coincidence:apologetic:.
Now that’s a good start,cheers Bruce.
Sounds about right and roughly what I thought it’d be Bruce.
Many thanks.
Its a Rotol company badge rivetted to the tip of the spinner.
Thanks Steve.I didn’t think of the tip of the spinner when he said “prop”.
Oh no the “Spitfire People’s Front” or the “People’s Front of Spitfire” will be manning the barricades over that….
Quickly men,man the barricades(eh?)……..
Leg-ends. ‘Glad all over’.
Mark
That is surely one of the best airshow pics so far this season.
Well shot indeed Mark.
Many thanks chaps.
I’ve passed the info on to my modelling collegue.
AFAIK,he’s doing a diorama with a Vixen in maintenance,hence the question.
Many thanks for that Pete.
He needs to get it right for the config/air files so that performance
matches the real thing.
I’ll pass it on.
Mark
Wasn’t it on ebay for a million quid or something the first time?
Could’ve been,I remember it was a lot more than the current asking price
for the thing.
I’m sure this one has been on the ‘Bay for sale before at about 200k IIRC.
Data Plate Reads:
Bristol Siddeley Olympus
Mk: OL320
SERIAL: OL2201 (Olympus type 22 number 01)
AM Number: A666160
Someone said it wouldn’t be ground runnable though unless it had been sleeved(?)
Something to do with the resonance vibration(?)that Olympii were prone too(?)
Like this:
http://spitfiresite.com/2010/07/anatomy-of-spitfire-cockpit.html/08es09_003
Spitfire hood jettison systems were actually made by,yes you’ve guessed it,
none other than Martin-Baker.
Like this:
http://spitfiresite.com/2010/07/anatomy-of-spitfire-cockpit.html/08es09_003
Spitfire hood jettison systems were actually made by,yes you’ve guessed it,
none other than Martin-Baker.