It also depends on what type you are building. The early III’s had a simple cushion (like the version I am building) where the bomb aimer was lying on his belly. The later versions such as NA337 had the more comfortable seating arrangment.
Up to you Phil,
Cheers
Cees
Yes…taken August 2005.
I have a feeling Doncaster will be visited soon…………….
Cees
At least that is the colour I chose
Cees
Well no actually. I had a higher ‘Mark’ number in mind. 🙂
Then there is PR503, a Mk XV, which will be the next Seafire to fly by my judgement.
I personally do not see PR451, in its current ownership, being on a airworthy path.
Mark
The Mk 46 LA564? (or LA546, always seem to confuse the two)
Cees
Phil,
Leather was used, but could be black or brown. My bet would be on the latter
Cees
Keeping the seafire topic.
Mk III RX168, the ex Irish ex Chris Warrilow (or isn’t it ex) Any pics what it looks like now?
Wasn’t it a few years ago that the cowlings of this aircraft turned up at Shoreham?
Cheers
Cees
Cees, Do Turretboy’s pictures give you what you need? Let me know if you need any more detail of anything.
Deryck
Deryck,
Well, any info on the throttle box and bombbay is welcome. Mike’s pics are great and are a great help but the bombbay structure is very complicated.
Cheers
Cees
Deryck,
What will be done with the drawings now the rebuild is finished? Keep them for LW170 (if raised) or will these be thrown into the bin (hope not, otherwise I would be interested in them)?
Any drawings about the throttle box or pics taken during the restoration of NA337’s throttle box showing the internals? I am desperate, can you tell 😉
Cheers
Cees
Back earlier in the thread someone asked the time required to restore NA 337, it was 10 years and a couple of months and some 350,000 manhours. The cost of the materials involved was about $1.0M.
Federal Government funding was received (I seem to recollect around $300,000.) to help with the recovery, which was done by Dacom Sea Sub, the remainder was raised from donations by the public, only one restoration member was a paid employee to oversee the work on the majority of the project, one other was paid to help restore the main spar. The value of the volunteer labour was estimated at around $9.0M.
Deryck,
Money well spent I would say. Do you have any pics showing the general bomb bay? For my 1/32 model I need some info on the structure and the manuals I have don’t give any clues (as do the scarce pics on the internet of the bombbay).
Cheers
Cees
Ok, Ok, I retract what I said, but it was supposed to be a bit tongue in cheek compared to some of the vitreol on this thread, sorry Mr Saunders, carry on the good work, now I know what you are really doing.
OK chaps,
Now we that out of of the way 😉 may we please congratulate Andy for having discovered the digital highway and this forum and welcome him. I would 😀
Cheers Andy for what you have been doing these past decades. A good example for us all. Now, you must have enless stories to tell about the many many recoveries………….. 😮
Cees
Prognosis:
If you form a museum, do not form a charitable status, and allow those who were never involved in the original project, to take over and form an old boys club!As it is now, it is stuffed full of silent exhibits and very few personnel who know anything of their real history.
Pity to read that this is thus not only happening in Holland but everywhere around the globe 😡
We have had the same experience with our own museum where people who have nothing in common with those who started the organisation in the early days, thought it necessary to wage some sort of personal war against those who run the whole organisation. After having “persuaded” these pioneers to leave only a few remained who knew what they were talking about and had to keep up with those irritating nitswits.
And they said it’s a hobby…………….
Andy Sauders is one of my heroes and got me starting in Aviation Archeaology in the first place.
Cheers
Cees
P.s. Black Panther, good on you to admit being wrong.
A pic of the fuselage has appeared in FlyPast in the early nineties together with a letter by the then owner, showing it standing upright on the roof (the fuselage, not the owner).
Cees
Thanks Mark,
I’m not worthy, I’m not worthy.
Perhaps I should stick to Halifaxes solely? :p
Cees
Its news to me that SX330 is a survivor. Have you not got it muddled up with SX300, ‘sister’ to the recently restored SX336?
Sorry, typo 😮
Cees
I thought a Mk V project was destroyed by fire in his workshop.
Cees