really…? where david we would love one for our engine collection
Ho ho Peter, 😮
Only for use on multi-engined aircraft (such as LW170) not to be collecting dust in the corner of a museum.
Cheers
Cees
The well should make room for a seat type parachute I think.
Cheers
Cees
Some very interesting points about the Defiant. Maybe if they had fitted a more powerful engine and additional forward firing guns it could have been even more effective in night fighter role.
Colin
Colin,
There were plans for a single seater version of the Defiant and if it had been fitted with a bubble canopy a very handsome aircraft would have resulted also forward firing armament was planned but as happened with so many projects…………….. nothing.
Cheers
Cees
Cumbria quarry
Well I’d love to see them, Steve, if there’s any way you can bring all the loose ends together. And judging by the views this thread is scoring, many others would enjoy them too!
I wish I’d taken more when I had the opportunity, even tho’ I was on the scene long after the end of the mega-scrap era.
Meanwhile, here’s another one. Not a scrapyard this time but proving that there IS still stuff buried in the ground. This is the famous quarry in Cumbria, not that many years ago. There was plenty of Albemarle structure around, as well as Tiger Moth and other stuff.
No excuses for getting this one back up again.
According to the thread there was a return visit planned to this quarry where still a lot of aircraft remains must lie. Any news on that?
Cheers
Cees
They haven’t got any engines so it might take a while ! To their credit they want the correct marks of Hercules for her and not some postwar units.
That will be a big problem then, the early Hercs are very scarce, even the static examples. Some are on display at the IWM or RAFM but they will never let them go (or you should make them an offer they can’t refuse).
Mmm Pete Vacher got a Merlin III on a seven year loan from the RAFM museum, must be his charme.
Cees
Good luck, hope you succeed.
Cheers
Cees
Not interested in Harrier bits, I’m sorry. But still hoping to see a Halifax throttle box in any condition turning up on e-bay. Still, it doesn’t seem to happen. 😎
Cheers
Cees
1 K being the asking price, how about some bartering. Apart from that what would be the scrap value (it’s not much to look at from a general non-enthusiast point of view) 250 pounds, less?
Cees
Cees- In all fairness it would be good to check out the Halifax rumour and there is a group on site who could do it it quite easily. However I cannot see why anyone would go to the bother of burying a Halifax at Hooton Park when they could just call in a scrap man from Birkenhead.
Just saw your post David,
My point exactly.
Cees
I wonder if someone could wrap up an uncertainty of mine for good. That is; is the airframe of the Hurricane MkII different in any visible way excluding armament to the MkI (and specifically around the nose area)? There being numerous model kits of the Hurricane I’d like to know how interchangeable they are. Published measurements differ in between themselves anyway, but although many (not all) seem to agree that the MkII is longer than the MkI, there is no mention of whether this is all in the rather longer Rotol spinner that most MkIIs and later shared.
I know there was initially a gap (‘thrust tolerance’) in between the prop and the cowling of the Watts-propellered MkIs and that this disappeared with Hamilton/DeHavilland/Rotol airscrews – but was this an extension of the cowling or simply the prop making up the difference? Did the ‘oil deflector ring’ add any length? Did the Merlin XX engined marks get any longer with the two-stage supercharger?
I suppose I’m in need of a really good book on the Hurri – any suggestions?
AFAIK on the Mk II the cowling aft of the exchaust stubs and the windscreen is longer than the Mk I.
I remember seing a drawing by master modeler Peter Cooke showing the difference.
Cheers
Cees
Stoppit Cees :D!
😮 🙂
Any idea about the Lancaser fuselage section that was recently spotted at Trenton?
Mike, any chance of you taking a visit there again soon? :rolleyes:
Cheers
Cees
Thank you all for your help. You will get recognised in my project.
Oh nooooooo!!!!!!!!! 😮 😀
Cees
Here is my contribution, a metal Halifax Mk III (actually this is engraved on the underside of the fuselage. The quality and detail is very good, I wonder if it was used as a gift for business contacts.
Cheers
Cees
Are we talking about the alleged buried Halifax at the former RAF Hooton Park, Wirral? There are several independent eyewitness reports of this one being buried and I know the spot where it is supposed to be. The aircraft details are known, too. The site is neither marsh nor flood-prone but it is quite close to the Manchester Ship Canal. I consider it very unlikely that it was buried, despite these reports to the contrary. But …..!
…….. noboby seems to bother trying to have look?
These stories are always told by third parties and nobody seems to know where they originated from. Eye witnesses should be a starting point. Phil, have you looked around Driffield if there are still aircraft parts lying around there? Must be a good starting point to find something instead of hearing stories but doing nothing about them. Tony Agar did what you can do best, go and have a look and finding a lot of Mossie bits at Litte Snoring. But he must be one of a few. Most other people are good at circulating stories but never bother to undertake some action.
Must be the difference between the armchair historian and the hardened aviation buff. Ian Foster is another good example of someone we can be proud of for having rescued a lot of stuff that would otherwise have rotted away or scrapped.
Think about it.
Cees