The nigh inevitable contribution from me…
There’s a Wellington throttle box, several control column tops and wheels, and sundry Wellington front turret spares out in the garage. Oh, and a DF loop fairing, too. And a leather seat cover with the aircraft’s serial number stencilled on it.
I recall stories that a section of Wellington fuselage was in use as a shed, somewhere in the Crewe/Nantwich area. Long time ago, though.
And even longer ago, as a youngster, I used to cycle to my local disused aerodrome at Cranage/Byley. Part of the attraction was the factory where Wellingtons were assembled, later a Ministry of Supply store but at that time apparently locked up and forgotten. I was always puzzled by the oval shaped structures which lay against one wall of the shed. I could never figure out what they were until many years later when I saw a sectioned view of a Wellington fuselage. They were either actual fuselage formers or possibly the jigs used to manufacture them. They’d gone by the late ’60s.
Could this be the same section that was incorporated into the fuselage of N2980 as the original was too weak to support the entire airframe. The real centre section of R-Robert is the exhibit next to the Wellington.
Cees
where did her throttle box go??
Peter,
You naughty boy! :p
Cees
No idea, I know he spent years digging bits out of a quarry at Aspatria and still goes up there.
According to Al682 the quarry still contains a lot of Albemarle components.
What’s still up there?
Cees
Greaeme,
Any pics taken of her during the SkyFame years?
Cheers
Cees
Given we are discussing engines of Manchesters what other bits of the type still survive? Anything of note or just a few piles of twisted metal? I cant say I have ever seen reference to anything but worth a try!
Jon
Jon,
Mostly twisted wreckage. But I believe the RAF Museum S-for Sugar was originally ordered as a Manchester. So technically she could still be a Manchester that was converted on the production line into a Manchester III AKA Lancaster I.
Cees
I’d go with Bruce every time – the Humbrol colours were apparently matched to MAP paint chips when the range was first produced, Humbrols range seems to work for RAF colours but not RLM or FS paint!
The colours in the Humbrol range are spot on, fact, since when we were trying to establish an interior green for the T-6 I checked Matt 78 against original wartime HARVARD parts covered in cockpit green. Now these parts came from all over the world, some NAA, some Noorduyn, and from varying airforces – Some slight fading aside Matt 78 was a decent match. Further, when some parts of TD248 passed through our hands a while ago i kept a chip of paint and Matt 78 also matches- OK she’s a late mark Spit but I would be confident in using that colour if you are happy with it (you will always get an ‘expert’ telling you tis wrong after you’ve finished spraying it 😉 🙂 )
TT
Funny to read that Ben,
Some small parts for my Halifax cockpit I have painted using tins of Humbrol among which was 78. I thought it matched some original green painted Halifax bits I have. Perhaps that is why I still use good old Humbrol for my modelling projects. I also read that the Brooklands Wellington was painted using Humbrol paints, don’t know if that is correct but if so they must have used slightly larger tins for such an airframe 😀
Cees
Unlikely. Why replace an icon with something that was considered unsuccesful in its day, and is only remembered today as ‘the forerunner of the Lancaster’?
Any director of a museum owning a Lancaster would have to be certifiably crazy to even consider it!
Mike,
Of course it would be sacriledge if a museum would only even contemplate such a conversion 😮 . But there are sections still around (Kermit Weeks, Sandtoft etc.) that can be used for such a project. Don’t forget the Manchester wasn only the forerunner of the Lanc. It was a type in itself of which high hopes were placed. But it represented a moment in time of Bomber Command that deserves a place. Why having only succesful types on display? It would be boring as that way most museums have similar collections which is to a certain extent already the case (in my very humble opinion).
Cees
So nothing of Waltzing Mathilda survives? Not even a not or bolt?
Cees
Hi Dave,
Two Manchester engines are in museums in the north and south of Holland. As I said ours came from the north sea and only just resembles a Vulture with the cilinder barrels and engine mounting being recognisable. The one in the north is very complete and still has its prop mounted. It came from a Manchester which crashed in soft soil.
Very interesting engine, deserves more PR
Cees
Thanks for the info.
I need this kind of information as well. Just last saturday I received the
flight engineers seat for my Halifax cockpit project. It was painted dark green more like American factories used to do it. Must be because my friend likes USAF aircraft. Soon this will be changed for the better, due to this topic.
Cees
Stuart,
I have seen a photograph of a Vulture that I thought was taken at RAF Stafford. It showed a substantial complete Vulture but still covered in peat, perhaps this was the same engine.
So no engines have survived not even at the Science Museum? The last Manchester was recovered from a quarry by an American team and scrapped. Pics in the book by Mr Kirby. Pity. I know where the wreck of one lies in the IJsselmeer but it is very shallow and not worth to recover for a restoration.
Cees
What is the derelict airframe sitting on the floor behind the He-111?
Dennis
Dennis,
Junkers 88, one of several recovered
Cheers
Cees
Very exciting news.
I can understand why a restoration to flying condition is ruled out. But how about to groundrunning standard? That would at least give some life instead of gathering dust as a static exhibit.
Cees
Elliott,
I had been in contact with Chris for a long time through e-mail as he had some Halifax stuff that I was very interested in. But it was all in vain. All he is interested in is getting parts for his own project and for free if possible.
If you need him he charges you an arm and a leg and anything he can get.
Cheers
Cees
It only wanted a cuddle. Maybe it came from a deprived background…. It should be understood and not shunned….. 😀 😀 😀 😀 😀
maybe it thought you were lonely and needed to show you that you ARE important and loved ….. 😀 😀 😀 😀 😀
Ali :diablo:
Allison,
Mm, the way you react to someones trauma tends to give a good impression about your character. And it doesn’t paint a positive picture.
You have no intention at all to investigate any possible wrecks but it seems that you are more interested in wasting a lot of webspace on this forum. If you need so much attention then I suggest you get yourself a ferret to annoy.
Cees