dark light

HP57

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,156 through 1,170 (of 1,229 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: BBMF Sickly Spit #1565351
    HP57
    Participant

    Airframe Assemblies work for BBMF

    In the latest FP issue on the work of Airframe Asemblies there was a photograph of a Spitfire stabilizer under restoration for BBMF. Which Spit would that be?

    Cheers

    Cees

    in reply to: Some Pictures of the Halifax restoration #1583603
    HP57
    Participant

    Glen,
    Thanks very much for the photo’s, especially the ones of the rudder pedals, now that clears up quite a few queries I had. If it is possible to talk about getting copies of drawings specific for the cockpit then please let me know how we can tackle this at best.

    You can also contact me directly at: [email]broere01@wanadoo.nl[/email]

    Cheers

    Cees

    in reply to: Some Pictures of the Halifax restoration #1585935
    HP57
    Participant

    I don’t mind it at all if NA337 is being restored in her original guise aka A Mk VII instead of a B Mk VII. But I have seen photo’s of a complete BP Mk VIII dorsal turret that is available to the restoration team.

    What will happen to that one, will it be put on display beside the restored NA337?

    Cheers

    Cees

    in reply to: Some Pictures of the Halifax restoration #1593266
    HP57
    Participant

    NOTE: HP57 Would you be interested in some factory specifications and designs specific to the layout of the cockpit and seat?… I know we have it all at the Museum and I would not be surprised if I could lay my hands on a copy of some of the actual drawings for you…

    Glen,

    If you can arrange that I would be very very very very grateful. Although I do have dozens of drawings, of which some are general arrangement drawings, none are specific for the cockpit and flight engineer area and that is what I am working on. Especially the fittings are very sketchy to say the least.

    Cheers

    Cees

    in reply to: Some Pictures of the Halifax restoration #1600849
    HP57
    Participant

    Hi Glen,

    If you are going to see NA337 again, could you take some photographs of the pilot’s floor and seat fittings? 😉 . I do have a drawing but there are many blank spots because the drawing is partly illegible. Also any pics of the seat itself (not fitted yet but stored next to the aircraft) and rudder pedal assembly close up would be great.

    Why? have a look at the International Cockpit Club website and look under gallery/instrument panels, you can’t miss it.

    Cheers

    Cees

    in reply to: Short Stirling Replica #1600879
    HP57
    Participant

    Peter,

    I have four photographs given to me by Giuseppe Lombardi (Pino) showing the sections in store (taken I think at Henlow). They show the tail in less condition than as shown by Cestrian and the centre fuselage section lying alongside together with some control surfaces. Strange to see that the black paint was still bright after decades outside and then flaked off in store, makes you wonder about making plans for restoration first before recovering a wreck (W1048, the Skua, you name them).

    The tail is complete with fin (and stabilizer, not sure about that one) so would make a very striking exhibit in it’s own right at Hendon………..

    Ahh, the Stirling, a classic bomber, a large gap to be filled in any museum.

    If only…….

    Cees(dreaming)

    in reply to: very interesting find, need help to identify #1601974
    HP57
    Participant

    1292126

    The code 29 indicates Short Stirling (type 29)

    I’m interested in any photo’s of that door as well.

    Cheers

    Cees

    in reply to: Empire Flying Boat #1604470
    HP57
    Participant

    Broome wrecks

    Among the Dutch/British seaplanes /flying boat wrecks that were destroyed by the Japanese near Broome during the war were also to Empire flying boats. A recent documentary showed that one wing with two engines still attached were still at the bottom.

    Cheers

    Cees

    in reply to: Short Stirling Replica #1604493
    HP57
    Participant

    Correction

    Dave said:

    I was rewatching a piece I taped some months ago from NZ news show ‘Holmes’ where a NZ policeman was interviewed live about how he helped in the recovery of a Stirling that crashed in Holland. His uncle was one of the crew. The recovery made some news again later because the crew were later buried in Britain a month or so back. Anyway, he mentioned that most of the metal they recovered was in excellent condition, “like new”. I wondered, could pieces from this recovery and others be used to help build a complete ‘replica’. I hope so.

    Answer:
    The six crewmembers were not buried in the UK but in Holland,in fact at the same cemetery as where the pilot had been laid to rest after having been found at the crashsite. Sorry, had to put that right (see also earlier thread about this topic).

    Dave said:
    what happened to the aircraft bits? Can they be used in a restoration?

    Answer:

    Dave, the remains of N3654 are still with us after having been released by the RNethAF. Although there are no substantial sections, there is a wealth of small fittings, brackets and castings etc. that can be used in the Stirling Project. I have been in contact with Giuseppe Lombardi some weeks ago and if all goes well a party will come over to Holland to have a look for themselves to see what can be recovered for the Stirling reconstruction. As Al Campbell stated (the New-Zealander you mentioned) the preservation is excellent and there is no corrosion whatsoever. I for one would be very happy to use recovered castings and brackets as the cost to make these from scrath would be very high indeed. For my Halifax cockpit project I also use parts from crashsites.

    Hope this clears things up

    BW the Stirling section mentioned earlier is probably from LK488 which was recovered from Mickle Fell, and which is in store at Wyton I think. Flypast did an article on that recovery fairly recentley.

    Cheerio

    Cees

    in reply to: Red Arrows to be grounded ????????? are they mad ! #1614837
    HP57
    Participant

    Red Arrows equipment, with a vintage taste

    How about some taking some Spitfire IX’s and paint them in Red Arrow colours, now that be something. :p Only problem would be to convince some owners to paint this scheme and avoid FLAK and Teddy’s from the purists.

    Cheers

    Cees (still having visions of G-FIRE flying in Europe)

    in reply to: Halifax repaint and Bomber Reunion #1617730
    HP57
    Participant

    can imagine it must have been incredibly tricky trying to put a bomber stream together, at night, without lights, and with radio silence, hence the rather lavish and obvious tailfin markings
    _________________________________________________________

    Hi Steve,

    These markings were actually intended for daylight operations as at the end of 1944/beginning 1945 the RAF was increasing its daylight sorties.

    Cheers

    Cees

    in reply to: Halifax repaint and Bomber Reunion #1790202
    HP57
    Participant

    I admit I am Xenaphobic (i.e. afraid of butch women in leather!
    ____________________________________________________

    Or do you mean Dutch women in leather!!??? 😎 😉 :rolleyes:

    Cheers

    Cees 😀 😀

    in reply to: Halifax repaint and Bomber Reunion #1791162
    HP57
    Participant

    Mmmmm, nice Halibag 😉
    I can sense a feeling coming up to meet the girl again soon. Don’t tell the wife :rolleyes:

    Cees

    in reply to: Luton Spitfire Project? #1814064
    HP57
    Participant

    Thanks Mark 12 for the update on the Seafire

    Cheers

    Cees

    in reply to: Luton Spitfire Project? #1816016
    HP57
    Participant

    There was also an article in Ae*** (eehm, the other magazine) showing the fuselage in the drive. It was stated at the time that this person had started a new production run of Spitfire I’s and one had been supposedly been sold to a wealthy arab.

    Speaking of Spits, I just got the latest copy of FlyPast and the Seafire 46 (LA564 or LA546, I cannot keep those apart) is still quoted to belong to a Newport Pagnell address, I thought that Peter Arnold sold both his projects last year?

    Cees (confused)

Viewing 15 posts - 1,156 through 1,170 (of 1,229 total)