dark light

FMK.6JOHN

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 736 through 750 (of 1,188 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Tip and run tactics against V1's #1319707
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Try this site, it has quite a few dates and squadrons and details.

    http://www.fiddlersgreen.net/AC/aircraft/V1/info/info.php

    Also this may be a good read as the chap had 52 1/2 confirmed V1 kills to his credit, again lots of dates and details.

    http://www.hawkertempest.se/berry.htm

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Warmed over TSR-2 threads maybe. #1320126
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    I have bumped into bits of TSR-2 on my travels,

    Ejector seat at FAST in Farnborough

    Seat and canopy in Midland Air Museum

    Undercarriage door and wing section at Newark air museum

    Cockpit section at Brooklands (Gutted)

    Cockpit guage at Doncaster Museum

    About three years ago an instrument from the BAC cockpit mock up went on E-bay for a mild amount:eek: .

    I bet there is more around if truth be told.

    John.

    in reply to: Warmed over TSR-2 threads maybe. #1320513
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Have a read through this thread and it may give you all the answers you need.

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=62591&highlight=tsr2

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Bournemouth Aviation Museum #1320939
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Had a spin on the website this morning and there is some fantastic shots and info, the wet start on XX894 is mind blowing!.

    Is there anything left of the experimental radar set up on 897, seem to remember it was for the Tornado programme?.

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Bournemouth Aviation Museum #1321105
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Nice to see the Bucc outdoors, last time I saw her she was hemmed in the back of the hanger.

    I believe they are going to run her engines up ths year?.

    John.

    in reply to: Whats in your collection ? #1322907
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Thanks Rocketeer, it would be nice to put a little history to it because it is quite a significant manual (to me anyway:) ).

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Whats in your collection ? #1323112
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Only a novice collector at the moment, unless people havn’t guessed I ar mostly been oglin Lightnings 😀 😀 .

    For visual pleasure in my snug…..
    http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/9660/2501072322large7lm.jpg

    Some bit of the genuine article, not much to some but absolute gold to me..
    http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/108/2501072320large7mo.jpg

    This one I want to know more about,
    A manual for the prototype Lightning XA847 (the first all british plane to acheive mach 2 in level flight) the dates inside start from 07/08/57 which is just before the plane was delivered to A&AEE.
    The name of the guy that signed the updates was Mr D. Jackson and there is also Mr Astbury in pencil on the front.
    If anyone can shed some light on this then please let me know.
    http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/3578/2501072323large6aw.jpg

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Fighting when drunk #1325475
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Kieth Rosenkranz, an F16 pilot wrote a book called ‘Vipers in the Storm’ about his experiences in the first Gulf war.

    He goes into great detail about the transit flight to Iraq which took over 16 hours and he was issued with amphetamines or ‘uppers’ as they are more commonley known, to be taken every two hours during the flight to keep the pilot’s alert.

    Upon landing they were then issued with sleepng pills or ‘downers’ to bring them back to reality and allow them to recover from such a long flight.

    Maybe no historic relevance but it demonstrates how past history has become common practice.

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Air-to-air refuelling #2529233
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Wonder what would have happened if that Tomcat had inhaled a boatload of fuel.

    Inhalng a boatload of fuel would quench the ignitors and cause the engine to flame out.

    John.

    in reply to: AA Classic Flight Aircraft #1326863
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Rob, the trouble is that the poster’s got just as much idea of the answer as anyone else and has the nouse to find the information. One might question why there’s a need to list serials but not bother looking them up on a well-known database….. or is the forum supposed to do all of BlueRobin’s homework for him?

    Robbo, has it not occured to you that ‘the poster’ or shall we call him BlueRobin to be polite was only trying to start a thread about what he can see that may or may not be listed on the AA website.

    It is obviouse to people that websites are not updated on a daily basis and as aircraft move around this arouses peoples interest and posting these movements on fora to start a discusion and find out any information is perfectly reasonable.

    John.

    in reply to: Sixteen years ago – where were you? #2529529
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Yes, I spoke with ‘Rosey’ (Keith Rosenkranz – Desert Storm Viper pilot from the 388th at Hill) about a month ago. He’s just gotten back from the desert again where he’d been working with integrating the Harpoon missile with the new F-16’s of the Omani Air Force.

    For those of you that don’t know Keith and his book “Vipers in the Storm” I very highly recommend it. It’s a great read and will literally put you in the cockpit with him flying missions over Iraq and Kuwait. http://www.vipersinthestorm.com

    Mike

    Keith Rosenkranz’s Vipers in the Storm, from Amazon.com

    MKopack,

    Firstly thanks for sharing your experiences, it has been an interesting thread, I was at the time finishing my last year at school and thinking about my career and what I was going to do when I left school.

    I have very recently read Kieth Rosenkranz’s book ‘Vipers in the Storm’ and was gripped from cover to cover, if ever anyone wants to now exactly what it was like to be there as a pilot then his book is THE ONE to read.
    PhantomII, I’m sure Mr Rosenkranz would disagree with your qoute that F16’s ‘were primarily used as a day dumb bomber’ 😉 .

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: MAM's HS125 – Hydraulic Demonstrator #1327867
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Well worth a Visit??????

    Are you kidding!!!!:D , I have allready discussed it with friends and a soon as the fair weather and sunshine arrive I will be making a trip to see MAM.

    I remember my last visit, seeing her when she was first delivered and thinking how messy she looked, but what a job:) she looks great.

    Well done to you all.

    John.

    in reply to: Max Cats #1330185
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Imagine if we had a flypast similar to that, all the raf types flying down the runway to god save the queen, all the righteous earth loving treekissing do-gooders would complain that it was an overboard show of power that would offend the ethnic minority assylum seeking type.

    And don’t get me going with the ‘it will deplete the ozone and cause global warming’ twerps:dev2:.

    Nice clip though:D .

    John.

    in reply to: Another "What if?" RAF/RN in Vietnam. #1332805
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    As some know the E E Lightning had development potential for ground attack roles, 1000lb bombs, Genie, Matra rocket packs, napalm and even nuclear capability.

    All this came to nought as the goverment ended further development but I can only wonder if we had gone to Vietnam then the developments would have been implemented and made a formidable interceptor/ground support aircraft.
    Extended range was a posibillity and the use of sidewinders would have made it unbeatable, especially against the Mig-21.

    The Hunter would have been a good ground support aircraft I think, bomb loads, napalm and rocket pods would have been on the shopping list but the lack of supersonic dash for escape and evasion may have made it an easy target for Migs.

    The goverment of the day in the early to mid sixties strangled the development of a lot of brilliant projects, projects that would no doubt have been implimented if we had gone to war and would have made a very different RAF than the one we have today.

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Damaged Spitfire at Duxford? #1334053
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Oh no!, yet another thread gone belly up:eek: .

    Leaving room and running fast………

    John.

Viewing 15 posts - 736 through 750 (of 1,188 total)