dark light

FMK.6JOHN

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 751 through 765 (of 1,188 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Buccaneer XX894 Progress Report #1334057
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    John,

    The list in short is as follows:

    · Rig the throttles and adjust the idling speed on both engines.
    (This will avoid asymmetric issues).
    · Fix the control and protection unit for the port engine.
    · Bleed the brakes and test the braking/anti-skid system.
    · Replace the aileron cables to the powered flying units.
    · Rig and align all flying control surfaces.
    · Fix the hydraulics on the bomb bay door.
    · And a list of other minor snags.

    Phew, a lot more still to do yet!

    Plazz

    Sounds like sore and bleeding knuckles all round, will she be making any moves at this years open day?, engine runs or some slow figure of eight manouvers maybe.

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Forum Meet 2007 #1244930
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Bump;) .

    Has a date been set?.

    John.

    in reply to: Bristol type 188 #1244973
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Midland Air Musium has an aileron I think, or could be a wing panel.

    Here is ‘the office’.

    http://img181.imageshack.us/img181/2609/bristol188xf926maincockqd6.jpg

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Buccaneer XX894 Progress Report #1245043
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Great news Plazz, I can’t wait to see her at this years open day.

    In short what has to be done to get her taxying now?, brakes, steering, MOT:D .

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Need some help editing image. #457768
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Guys

    Brilliant efforts all round:D , can I e-mail the high res version to someone for the full treatment as I would like to have it printed off A3 size for my office.

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Why the Vulcan? #1245521
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Oooops:o 😮 , post corrected.

    Too much fizzy pop last night:p .

    John.

    in reply to: Zapped #1245527
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Vulcan for sure:D .

    RCAF Sqd badge?

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Why the Vulcan? #1245538
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    A toughy for me, I have allways been split between the two and never really considered an either or scenario.

    The Vulcan to me is a beautifull lady that gracefully dances around the sky with such agility and power and those screaming Olympus engines, this is the thing though, she just doesn’t look brute enough.

    The Victor on the other hand to me is a mighty sledgehammer, a powerfull looking animal of an aircraft that could deliver a very bad day, bomb loads would have not been important if the types had stayed in service a little longer as free fall bombing has given way to prescision munitions, IIRC the Vulcan was fitted with LGB’s for trials but never implimented.

    Beauty, agility and power….
    http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/9704/vulcanxm575portfront1qo1.jpg

    Hard looking, fast flying sledgehammer……
    http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/8773/xm715teasintinaportsideca6.jpg

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: This Forum's Shackleton project #1245734
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    An interesting story camlobe, well done to all involved:D .

    As an asside I think you should qualify for a new free clutch from Landrover as you have clearly advertised how strong it is:dev2: .

    I wish you and all the project members all the best for her restoration.

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Shackleton to fly #1245850
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    I can’t clarrify that any more XL391, it depends on how you read the piece and how the author interpreted his research.

    From my point of view he directly quotes that mod 2222 was estimated to cost 1.2m in 92 by the MOD and that it actually cost the TVOC £80,000.

    Quite what else is involved in the mod 2222 I do not know so you could be very right in what you say, MOD cost of 1.2m would have involved a lot more and TVOC’s quote of £80,000 might have just been for wacking some plates on and riveting them into place;) .

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Shackleton to fly #1245943
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    The lottery funding for such a project would certainly be out of the question, as has been mentioned before look how long it took the TVOC to get this far and it has not been an easy ride either.

    On the cost of the re-spar I have read a recent artical on the progress of XH558 and one of the points was that the MOD predicted that the rear spar strenghtenng in 1992 would cost around 1.2m and that it actually cost in 2006 a mear £80,000 (mod 2222).

    And lets not forget what happened to the unfortunate Pellican 16:( , I am sure that the CAA would think very carefully about letting another Shack fly especially in the UK.

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: How to post thumbnails? #457794
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    TA DA !!!!!

    Lots of self birching and a few swear words later I have worked it out:D 😀 .

    John.

    in reply to: How to post thumbnails? #457798
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/7664/saabajsh37viggensernoey3.jpg

    in reply to: How to post thumbnails? #457803
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Ok I give in!!! How do you post images directly onto this forum using an image hosting site?

    John.

    in reply to: How to post thumbnails? #457805
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant
Viewing 15 posts - 751 through 765 (of 1,188 total)