dark light

FMK.6JOHN

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 931 through 945 (of 1,188 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Most beautiful jet #1267357
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    The Hunter may well be the most beautiful jet fighter but the Victor certainly holds the title of most beautiful jet bomber. :p

    😀 😀 😀 😀

    John.

    in reply to: Most beautiful jet #1267362
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    The Hunter may well be the most beautiful jet fighter but the Victor certainly holds the title of most beautiful transport jet. :p

    :confused: :confused: Transport??? :confused: :confused:

    John.

    in reply to: Rubbish on eb*y #1267698
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Think he means ‘stored in a dry loft’ but still which ever way you slice it, it spells out lump of junk to me.

    I am no expert on trench art but that sure as hell is not!!!!!!.

    John.

    in reply to: Most beautiful jet #1269887
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    “The most beutiful jet”

    I have for the last couple of years been obsessing about one particular jet (no guesses!!) so in reading this thread I have searched for an alternative choice.

    I would have to agree with most about the Hunter, Starfighter, Mig and Sabre but I have been thinking about a small airfix model I made once and it has got my juices going again.

    Hell knows why I like it so much becouse it is a pig ugly aircraft but for some reason it ticks all the right boxes and it held a few records in it’s day.

    The Saab J-29 Tunnan.

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Most beautiful jet #1271266
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Lukeylad those shots nearly made me change my mind, looks like it could ruin your day just stood still!!!, but for me it will always be the English Electric Lightning.

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Four Lightning"s Part Two……Photo's #1271345
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Looks like a synchro start as they are taxying one after the other, nice shots by the way and welcome to the forum.

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Four flying Lightning's together. #1276406
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Werever a Lightning is registered you still have to get permission from the UK CAA to be able to fly one over here.

    It was mooted that Mr Beechyhead was having talks with the CAA to be able to ferry fly one over here for some appearences on the airshow circuit, this may be feasable as Thundercity has a Buccaneer configured as an AAR tanker.

    This has been discussed elsewhere within this forum and I think that red tape and other complications would prevent this from ever happening.

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Four flying Lightning's together. #1278168
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Which airframe would you choose though John ?

    Most of the UK airframes that could be considered are up on FI, including our two.
    You would want a T5 really, what am I saying just forget it, it aint gonna happen, a simular set up to the 558 thing would be needed.

    There are really very little options left in the UK for a flying Lightning simply becouse all (now four!) of the best are in SA, the obviouse to some are 728 or 904 as they are as close to airworthy as visable becouse they have been untouched since flying into Brunty all that time ago.

    This is not really a suitable option becouse fatigue as you say is up on both but I have been watching with keen interest Gatwick Aviations ex Saudi Lightning 53-671/G-27-41/ZF 579.

    They have done a fantastic job of bringing a dismantled basket case back to life, they have fitted zero timed engines, new nose gear, many new spares have been fitted, most systems have been re-condtioned and brought back to life……the list goes on, if you did not know any better by looking at their web site you would be forgiven for thinking that they are actually going to fly this bird.

    What is most impressive is that the FI for this airframe is just 81.12 out of 105 max, this gives enough FI for a long career on the display circuit.

    This s all speculative day dreaming mind and I am sure that there may be one or two others out there that could be possible candidates, what about the two seater at Cranfield?, if the CAA set a limit on the Lightning of subsonic speeds and a max height of 10,000ft then why should it be any different thatn a Hunter/Bucc/558?.

    IIRC the Lightning’s display was subsonic and low level so this shouldn’t be a problem, and for sure it was the showstopping event to beat all, Finningly, Binbrook, fresh cut grass, avtur, getting lost in the crowd and then there it is…………low in the distance, a speck…….the crowd grows calm and an uneasy silence falls upon the airfield with just the sound of birds in the background.

    There is a whisper amongst the people as the speck grows larger…..larger…….larger, the wings appear and the tail pearces the sky in that unmistakable silhouette that is defined as the peerless English Electric Lightning.

    The heart skips, still no sound just the birds and the gentle sound of people jostling for a better view, you don’t notice now that you are rooted to the spot, all feeling and sensation bellow the waist has gone, you just concentrait on getting that beutifull sight picture as it looms closer.

    It is not long as the Lightning has turned into the circuit to beat up the airfield and there is that distinct little trail of smoke as the coals are poured on and the burners are lit………it’s comming.

    The noise is increasing now…..louder….louder untill all other noise is cancelled out and the ground is resonates to the sound of Avons, banking the Lightning passes at full chat with less than 100ft on the Rad Alt and clouds of condensation spilling off the upper wing surfaces, as it nears the end of the crowd line she pulls up into a vertical climb that sees her dissappear into the cloud with only that unmistakable rumble as your internal organs begin to move back to where they came from.

    It’s been 18 long years since that spectacle was last bestowed upon me and I dream of the day it will happen again, all the F14’s-15’s-16’s-18’s will never make up for what should be and that is a flying Lightning in the UK, Lightndattic take note 😉 .

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Four flying Lightning's together. #1279329
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Too fast, too expensive, too complicated, not enough spares, too dangerous, too noisey……..and thats just the CAA!!!!.

    When they were retired in the late eighties people tried and had a few registered on the civil register but every time the guidelines where met the CAA moved the goalposts untill they eventually they just said no.

    The South African CAA are just as stringent with the rules but they did work with Mr Beechyhead to make sure everything was above board and pro-activly helped get them flying, something which our CAA is distinctly lacking in but who knows? since the advent of 558 and the Buccaneer, maybe just maybe………one day…….

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: RAF Binbrook as it was and in 2006 #1284617
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    This is more like how I want to remember Binbrook, drying off between showers and soiling myself inside a live airworthy Lightning, One day…………

    John.

    in reply to: RAF Binbrook as it was and in 2006 #1284740
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Here are a few taken last year, When taking these pictures I could still hear the jet noise from August 22nd 1987.

    John.

    in reply to: Airshow selection (compression test!). #547356
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    Morning all,

    I use Pixmantech, rawshooter essentials 2005 as I shoot in RAW format (the only way to get the quality from my D70s), it is a basic programme and I can touch up the exposure, saturation and a couple other bits and then convert to Jpeg file.

    Once I have the Jpeg I then use Advanced JPEG Compressor v4.8, I have only just got this one and it is fantastic for reducing the file size and picture size without quality degradation (other programmes create a stepladder effect on straight edges when reducing sizes), it also has a basic un-sharp mask function but it works on a slider and not by entering values so it is not very user friendly.

    I also have Adobe Photoshop V7.0 but I still have yet to learn more about that one and my post picture processing time is getting to much an amature like me!!!

    When I set out to begin photography it is not my intention to run with the big boys, I am just trying to get my pictures somewhere near to reasonable for posting on here and e-mailng to friends, I am very greatfull for all the advice given here and fell like I am getting there.

    Many thanks,

    John.

    in reply to: Airshow selection (compression test!). #547383
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    I posted a thread about the unsharp mask recantly, i dont know if you read it but there was some very helpfull replies there.

    Cheers ollie I will digest the other thread asap.

    Also looking at the Hendon photo you need to add some distortion control, the top of Black 6 rear fuesalage looks wrong and the Me262 did not have dihedral as far as i can remember.

    How wrong? colour/focus/distortion?, the ‘dihedral’ behind the 262 is the Kawasaki ki-100 main wings 😀 😀 .

    Regards,

    John.

    in reply to: Airshow selection (compression test!). #547385
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    the shot was obviously planned this way, pity about the other photographer though.

    Yes I did plan the shot and I had to do it bloody quick as a truckload of schoolkids where on their way in and the other photographer was an acceptable blemish as apposed to two thousand kids 😡 .

    Must try harder next time!! :p .

    John.

    in reply to: Airshow selection (compression test!). #547603
    FMK.6JOHN
    Participant

    RobAnt

    I assume you are using Adobe when you talk about unsharp mask?, that to me is a whole new ball game and very complicated!.

    The high res original is damn near perfect but I am aiming to get the file size suitable for posting and e-mailing, I feel a hurdle has been overcome with file size and dimensions and I will have to get into Adobe and try this un-sharp mask buisness but that will be later today.

    Thanks,

    John.

Viewing 15 posts - 931 through 945 (of 1,188 total)