dark light

Canuck

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 136 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Bolingbroke's at Hamilton ONT Aug 1991 #1038951
    Canuck
    Participant

    Canuck,

    It would be great if you could share your scans with us.:)

    Cees

    OK, M’neer… Now I just have to find my “Boly Box”, which is hidden away SOMEWHERE. 😮

    Canuck
    Participant

    Hi Canuck!
    I think you are right on the Cessna/Robertson (Wren 460 etc.) connection. I think the gentleman`s name was James L. Robertson and that he was involved in several companies/projects.
    Please see Aerofiles.com (Roberston, Skycraft, Wren etc.)

    Thanks, wout!

    Jim

    in reply to: Foreign Air Force Chipmunks #1039456
    Canuck
    Participant

    The first 10 were built at Chester, the other 66 by OGMA.:D

    Were the OGMA-built ones CKD “kits”, or built from “scratch”.

    I seem to recall reading somewhere that OGMA had built Tigers as well – so their relations w. Hatfield would have been rather good, one gathers?

    in reply to: Foreign Air Force Chipmunks #1039616
    Canuck
    Participant

    The Portuguese Chippies were built by OGMA, I believe.

    THIS is what a “proper” DHC-1 looks like, btw! :diablo:

    http://www.spitcrazy.com/ChipmunkLR.jpg

    Canuck
    Participant

    I’m wondering if Robertson is the same guy who owns the STC for Cessna STOL kits?

    in reply to: Bolingbroke's at Hamilton ONT Aug 1991 #1039643
    Canuck
    Participant

    ok …
    Why dont they offer some of the extra “surplus to requirements” parts for sale to generate funds for the restoration?

    As I remember, bad experiences with engines & airframe parts sent overseas. Made them understandably gunshy about much “swapping”. 😉

    A certain O H-B may come to mind?

    in reply to: Bolingbroke's at Hamilton ONT Aug 1991 #1039648
    Canuck
    Participant

    BRAVO! to the Boly Crew!

    Thanks for the thread, and the updates.

    In at the beginning (1985), there were very few of us … Wayne Ready, Doug Sayles and myself, along with two or three others, whose names escape me, after so many years passing.

    I do recollect Sandy Thompson (now owner/operator of a Fouga and a TT Sea Fury) joining us in about ’86 or ’87.

    If anyone wants me to post pictures of Boly parts from the Eighties, both at CWH, and in St. Andrews, MB – I can likely dig some up, and scan them in.

    Seeing 10117 “up on her legs” is a wonderful thing. I wish CWH would get their website updated, however! :rolleyes:

    Canuck
    Participant

    Well it IS a bit large to be a Tomtit, eh? 😮

    Also, it seems to be up an engine… I thought old Syd kept his biplane designs pretty much to single-engined ones?

    Canuck
    Participant

    The tail looks deHavillandish… the wings & nacelles Vickersy…

    Is the “swallow” of any signifigance?

    in reply to: Landing gear to identify… #1043634
    Canuck
    Participant

    Look very much like a Bolingbroke to my eyes, so Beau/fort/fighter is entirely logical, imho.

    Canuck
    Participant

    Initially, I came only for the “Wot Plane” thread… as I must confess to being a tad busy in RL during the Air Show season. Last week was first log-in since April, sadly.

    However, I rather enjoy some of the folk here, and hope to speak with more of you, one-on-one, as time passes. Like Paul and Peter, there are many places that my next visit to the UK will include – one hopes with local chaps leading!

    Some random musings:

    Years ago (my first issue is Oct./86), I was an avid FlyPast reader – so I certainly appreciate Key’s massive support for our passion.

    Being Canadian, one is somewhat amused at the differences in perspective ‘twixt our “Neighbours to the South” and “the Old Country”.

    Being regularly around a plethora of turning Pratts, Merlins, etc., one sometimes forgets the schoolboy wonder that got us IN to this lifelong addiction…

    The banter upon these pages refreshes that enthusiasm, especially after a busy season, where spectators’ annoying habits often are what one remembers, rather than the wonder of the “wains” and the quiet smiles of those frail, but bright-eyed octogenerian gentlemen.

    Yeah, I do appreciate this Forum, all in all.

    Cheers!

    Jim

    in reply to: What about a new Hurricane? #1046117
    Canuck
    Participant

    Speaking of Hurricane Projects…

    Yeah, we have a 75%-done Mk XII at Gatineau which has been “bumped” by the Lizzie, Swordfish and Cornell. I hope that the project resumes in earnest this winter.

    in reply to: Airworthy Il-2 – Sturmovik flies #1046672
    Canuck
    Participant

    Being as the discussion has touched on P38’s, I thought I’d better post to clarify that almost all P38’s had handed props…

    All other P38’s had outwardly handed props except for the small batch of export examples intended for use by the RAF which had both props right-handed. In the end these weren’t delivered and most were used by USAAF units back in the States.

    So it could feasably be a left-handed P38 Allison in this Il-2…

    Thanks for the clarification! I guess I had the “almost-Brit” Lightnings stuck in my aged brain. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Go see Aviation History game… #1046829
    Canuck
    Participant

    My ten, in no particular order:

    UK:
    Stranraer at Hendon
    Alcock & Brown Vimy
    XH558
    Romaine’s latest Bolingbroke

    USA:
    B-36 at Wright-Pat
    “Glacier Girl”

    Finland:
    Humu
    Fokker D XXI – both @ Keski-Suomen museum, I think.

    Russia:
    Both IL-2’s

    Here:
    FM213 – she never disappoints.
    Sproat Lake Mars’ – in flight, I’m sure it (they) are as awe-inspiring as the Vulcan!

    in reply to: Airworthy Il-2 – Sturmovik flies #1047527
    Canuck
    Participant

    I think you will find that most were (and still are, in the case of surviving examples)

    Yes, I was aware that “Glacier Girl” indeed has handed Allisons – but I thought that the later Marks had dispensed with that, for initial costs, and ease of field maintenance, etc.

    And I HAVE been edified, today. I was under the mistaken impression that Hisso/Klimov’s rotated as do the US-built V-12’s…. not the UK types.

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 136 total)