There were still two Viggens there when I visited in June 2006.
It’s a Cessna 206
I really don’t understand why we cannot adopt the system used widely in the USA (among other places) , whereby you sign a form to confirm that you accept that the aircraft is not certified as a public transport aircraft , that the flight you are taking is at your own risk and that nobody will get sued if anything goes wrong.
At the risk of offending, DHA stands for De Havilland Aircraft, the De Havilland Aircraft Pty Ltd subsidiary of its English parent. I used to think the “A” stood for Oz, but not so.
Thanks for the link to HARS and to Glenn for the shot [the landing one in 2003 arguably the best, tho!]
G’day 😉
No offence taken – thanks for putting me straight.
What is that in the last photo?
It’s a De Havilland Australia Drover.
More info here if you are interested :-
Sounds interesting.
How does the flying work – can you choose which aircraft you want to fly in or is it pot luck ?
Yes , it is an Antonov AN-2
This is a very useful website for pleasure flying contacts :-
http://www.fleetairarmarchive.net/Museums/RideinHistoricAircraftOperatorsA-Z.html
My first flight was a circuit in an Islander (G-BNEA) at the Abingdon Airshow in September 1979
The Canadian Lancaster is operated by Canadian Warplane Heritage at Hamilton , near Toronto.
There is a list of contacts for them here :-
Ruud ,
I have some more information on the Mig 15 which you saw at Nowra. It is one of two owned by a company called Air Combat Australia , and is used for experience flights. The registration is VH-EKI.
You can find details of the company and its aircraft here :-
http://www.aircombat.com.au/aca/pages/about.htm
Regards ,
Mark
The story has also recently been turned into an opera in Australia , which includes a quite convincing mock-up of a crashed B-17 on the stage.
Details and pictures here :- http://www.themadleemachine.com/
When I visited Parafield earlier this year , it was stored in the back of a hangar , with the damage still visible and no sign of any work being done on it.
Having investigated further , it looks like you are both right – the TB-7 and the Pe-8 are apparently two different names for the same design. Petlyakov designed the TB-7 while working under Tupolev , and it was later designated the Pe-8 in his honour. Just to add to the confusion , it also has another alternative designation , the ANT-42 !
Anyway , thanks for your help.