dark light

pagen01

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,526 through 3,540 (of 9,672 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Cosford,white Vulcan,a/c outside in the old 1980`s #1086978
    pagen01
    Participant

    Nice shots! Funny that common sense rightly says that aircraft should be preserved indoors for their long term health as much as possible, but there is something about seeing them all outside like that appeals to me. Photographically it’s far better!
    Can you imagine seeing an Me410, Ju52, Liberator etc displayed outside on a grass area now?!
    Nice to see the Valetta on display and the Victor Mk1.
    It was a real shame that the Canberra B(I).8 was deemed unworthy of being kept by the RAFM, but at least it is in good hands now.
    There have been some shameful decisions made in the past at Cosford, both by the RAFM and BA collection.

    Vulcan XM598 arrived in early 1983 if that helps with dates.

    in reply to: Nimrod gate guardian under threat? #1087148
    pagen01
    Participant

    Tony, I said exactly the same thing when the first rush of Nimrods for disposal was first mooted.
    I didn’t think the Kinloss example would be the first to succumb, but then it is becoming an Army camp and they don’t like RAF toys left about!

    in reply to: Vc-10,tristar,hercules + many more #1087163
    pagen01
    Participant

    I would like to know what is the current update on the Comet that is at Lyneham is this going to move to Brize Norton ??

    Comet looks to be going to Cosford, thread here, http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?t=109403

    in reply to: RAF A & B pattern camouflage #1087224
    pagen01
    Participant

    I’ve seen it suggested that the first of a type off a production line had ‘A’ and the next example ‘B’ Scheme applied, thus an odd serial number could have the ‘A’ Scheme applied.
    It’s hard to imagine that with wartime production pressures that the rule could be that strictly adhered to, even if an approximate 50/50 balance of the schemes was achieved.

    in reply to: Vc-10,tristar,hercules + many more #1087229
    pagen01
    Participant

    I suppose that’s a question for IWM to answer as to whether they consider the C1K/K3/4 historically important enough in a military context (they have after all be continuously on ops for over 20 years).

    Equally it could be asked if they could justify the expense of having two aircraft of the same type but in different paint, most visitors wouldn’t be worried about it. There then also creeps in the ugly spectre of the civil 10 possibly being disposed of when someone in the future can’t justify spending money on both airframes (see Dux Victor thread!) and the RAF one is in better nick.
    As long as Cosford and Brunty get a C.1K the military version will be represented.
    BTW am I alone in thinking that it would be great to see the last K.4 preserved? We have it in on maintenance and it’s surprising how different it looks to the C.1s.

    Great news about the Herc JT!

    Nice story TonyT, and the 10 and Herc both share some massive humanitarian accolades.

    in reply to: Hendon and Cosford new aircraft news #1087239
    pagen01
    Participant

    The Swift is a significant aeroplane of the 30’s, and it is right that one should be preserved inperpetuity. Whilst RAFM may not, technically be the right organisation, I cant think of a better one!

    The aforementioned Science Museum and Shuttleworth Collection are far better options, JDK puts the Science Museums case very well.
    I still maintain there are other types that should be in the RAFM before the Comper.
    However if this is part of a bequeathment from Henshaw to the RAFM then that puts a different light on things, certainly from an honouring the wish point of view.
    But wouldn’t Hendon be better for this airframe than Cosford? Camms’ Cygnet is there under the same kind or reasoning.

    Jeepmans’ idea is a good one, but does give that feeling that the RAF Museum is spreading in its remit.

    in reply to: Vc-10,tristar,hercules + many more #1087421
    pagen01
    Participant

    I thought the VC-10 to Dux was off due to them already having the BOAC example?

    Re Britannias I actually think that they are good example of the balance of preservation being just right, four complete examples is all that is realistically needed to represent the type, and two are in RAF colours, though only XM496 at Kemble is a genuine RAF C.1.

    in reply to: Vc-10,tristar,hercules + many more #1087451
    pagen01
    Participant

    As I understand it two RAF VC-10s are earmarked for preservation, one at Cosford and the other for Brunty.

    An example of the Hercules C.1 & 3 desperately deserves to be preserved, not only as piece of of outstanding and successful aircraft design, but also for the incredible service that it has given to the RAF over 40+ years, IMO on a par with a lot of wartime types in that respect.

    As for the Tristar, well it’s a Tristar! I would think its size and lack of public appeal would go against serious preservation efforts of one.

    in reply to: General Discussion #321300
    pagen01
    Participant

    but if you suddenly met your maker, would your affairs be in order?

    Nope, and neither would I care!:)

    Hopefully I will be run over by a bus by the time I get to hear Knowall Gallaghers’ version of There Is a Light That Never Goes Out!:eek:

    in reply to: If you walked under a bus… #1860483
    pagen01
    Participant

    but if you suddenly met your maker, would your affairs be in order?

    Nope, and neither would I care!:)

    Hopefully I will be run over by a bus by the time I get to hear Knowall Gallaghers’ version of There Is a Light That Never Goes Out!:eek:

    in reply to: Cold War Jets Bruntingthorpe 29 May 2011 #515039
    pagen01
    Participant

    Excellent shots Richard, just the right angles and you have caught the classic Lightning intake vapour superbly.
    ISTR it is an effect compounded by ambient moisture content in the air.

    in reply to: General Discussion #321739
    pagen01
    Participant

    like the Oddball lookalike, very convincing!:)

    in reply to: Dad's Army! #1860702
    pagen01
    Participant

    like the Oddball lookalike, very convincing!:)

    in reply to: Pilots Pals Calendar #413374
    pagen01
    Participant

    The poor girls were trying desperately hard to emulate the allure of the Dunlop calendars, but had the most abysmal weather and surroundings to work with. It just made me want to put a warm blanket around them and feed them hot cocoa.

    Yes, those were exactly my thoughts aswel!

    in reply to: General Discussion #323268
    pagen01
    Participant

    Pirates of the Caribbean On Stranger Tides

    Excellent as always with these films, however I would say slightly the poorer for not having a lot of the original cast in it and it just felt different and more serious than the others – it could be though that like the previous two instalments that it requires re watches to fully appreciate it (critics complain that these three are too convuluted).
    The first 20 minutes or so seen a bit odd aswel, almost like panto style acting with the King, but as soon as we get to the scene with Keith Richards it gets going again!
    Penelope Cruz is far better in it that I would have credited her, and is gorgous! Ian McShane (yes Lovejoy!) is brilliant aswel, though for me no one does a pirate better than Rush’s Barbossa – “I’m curious, after killing me what is it you’re planning on doing next?”!

    Watch out for the trippy Mermaids, possibly a very good reason (along with some of the action) to watch the 3D version, which I didn’t and wish I had.

    Great watch, full of action and laughs.:)

Viewing 15 posts - 3,526 through 3,540 (of 9,672 total)