dark light

chippie51

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 167 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Fairey Swordfish Or 111F Remains Found In Far East #1088669
    chippie51
    Participant

    Sri Lanka Swordfish remains

    It was, if I recall correctly, a gentleman by the name of John Parker of Bognor Regis. It would have been about 1983, Cripes, that long ago? Now I’m feeling old.

    G

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #1091893
    chippie51
    Participant

    Fuel Priming Pumps

    We have a few bagged fuel priming pumps for the Shack which may be available.

    G

    in reply to: Cosford Wellington Colours? #1096098
    chippie51
    Participant

    Wimpie

    You are correct Bruce, she is internally configured as a T10 and it would be a shame to see her bug@ered around with and the original equipment separated from the aeroplane. Members of the public are not allowed within the aeroplane so to a degree, at least from a public perception perspective, her internal configuration is largely irrelevant. However, in external appearance she would be more representative of the day to day RAF Wellingtons in which so many paid the ultimate price if displayed in a simple un-marked night bomber scheme than in silver markings. I wouldn’t profess to be a psychologist by any means, but I would imagine that more people of our generation would stop and perhaps reflect more on what the bomber crews went through while looking at a Wartime configured (turreted) night-bomber marked Wellington than they would if in post-war trainer silver. Sad, but not necessarily something that can be changed.

    That said, we should of course all be grateful that she has survived at all, so let’s just be pleased to have her around regardless of what colours she appears in!

    G

    in reply to: Cosford Wellington Colours? #1096255
    chippie51
    Participant

    Wimpy

    As I understand it, and I am of course willing to be corrected if not, was she not actually manufactured as a turret equipped bomber? Assuming this is correct I guess that she rolled off the production line in a black bomber scheme, albeit without squadron markings and was presumably initially accepted in such a scheme by the RAF. Would this not be a more suitable scheme for display?

    G

    in reply to: British Honduras Buccaneers #1096362
    chippie51
    Participant

    Buccs

    Interesting, this is the second time in a few months that this question has been asked – the book must be selling a few copies!

    Anyway, here’s the answer to the original question:

    Just looking at my copy of the book, no serials are ever mentionned, only the aircraft numbers 030 and 021. Although there is a photo in the book with the aircrew standing in front of a buccaneer with the clearly visible serial XN977. A bit of research on the web reveals that 030 was XN977 and 021 was XV154. Both were sadly scrapped in 1991 and 1992 respectively. Shame.

    Hope that helps

    That is a great shame indeed – I figured they had probably long since expired, but sad to have this confirmed. Does anyone know of the status of the two tankers?

    Strange to think that it’s now almost 40 years ago, and almost twenty since they were scrapped. How time passes……

    G

    in reply to: Wolves in sheeps clothing to identify #1098578
    chippie51
    Participant

    Patton film P-51

    The P-51 in the Patton film (if it ever appeared in the film – my memory says it didn’t appear on screen) was I believe the Shoreham based Mustang of Charles Masefield. She’s now based near Port Elizabeth in South Africa.

    G

    in reply to: Newark's Luscombe Query ? #1099247
    chippie51
    Participant

    Historic Aircraft Connection

    There is a connection here to old aeroplanes, beyond the particular microlight in question. Patrick Luscombe was, I understand, heavily involved with the ill-fated British Air Reserve at Lympne and owned the former Southend Sea Fury which is now flying in America.

    G

    in reply to: Cockpit parts wanted #1115354
    chippie51
    Participant

    E2B

    We need an E2B for the G.46 as well if anyone has a spare. Not standard fit for the Fiat, but it’s small enough to fit in the top of the windscreen out of the way.

    Thanks,

    G

    in reply to: The Calgary Mosquito(Updated News) #1121082
    chippie51
    Participant

    T3

    And if the T3 leaving the UK means that it has an opportunity to take to the air again I can only applaud the transaction that brings that about.

    The fact is that there exists a rebuildable Mosquito in Canada which has been relatively unloved for a considerable number of years for which there existed a viable opportunity to have her back in the air. That deal was blocked, partly through the lobbying of folks who quite frankly should have known better. The Mossie is sadly under represented as a flying aeroplane, not just here in the UK, but also across the Atlantic.

    So, the good folks of Calgary get to see, eventually, what a Mosquito looks like. What a great shame no one gets to see what a Mossie can actually do when she gets air under her wings. Now, that would have been a bold and worth step. Sadly not to be.

    Don’t get me wrong, I have a great deal of admiration for those who will eventually rebuild her for display in Calgary, I wish them every success and if we can help with spares I’ll be pleased to see what we can do. It remains, however, an utter waste of a good aeroplane.

    G

    in reply to: The Calgary Mosquito(Updated News) #1121709
    chippie51
    Participant

    Donning Flack Jacket

    Just wondering on what basis this can be considered good news. That Mossie represents one of the best opportunities to place a further example back in the air. The museum concerned has held it for a number of years and has made no progress with is – yet a purchaser who comes forward with a viable desire (and means) to get her back in the air is blocked. Now, I know that the plan to get her back in the air involved her being sold to a UK based collector, but surely this should be a secondary factor to her being put back into the air. Yet again a fantastic opportunity has been halted by a small minded attitude.

    If it took the export of a static UK located Mossie to another country in order to get one back in the air I’d personally be all for it.

    What a wasted opportunity.

    G

    ps, is there a Canadian equivalent of the “little Englander” phrase?

    in reply to: 2024T0, any ideas on UK suppliers? #1129071
    chippie51
    Participant

    Alas not

    Thanks Tony, had already tried the google approach – alas with no success. Not held in the thicknesses we need.

    G

    in reply to: Dove Trestles #1142805
    chippie51
    Participant

    Dove

    Thanks Roget, that would be great.

    G

    in reply to: Any experts on Dunlop numbers out there? #1155746
    chippie51
    Participant

    Dunlop bits

    The first port of call for information was Dunlop, the second was the RAF Museum. Both drew a blank sadly.

    OK, a few other numbers:

    AHO35387 – brake bag

    AHO89474 – brake lining

    AHO17411, 27G/4619 – brake bag

    27G/4675 – brake bag

    and a brake relay valve, Mk III, 27G/2585. Part number appears to be AC12734.

    As always, any help much appreciated!

    George

    in reply to: Mystery Bf109G at Emmen, Switzerland #1156806
    chippie51
    Participant

    Re-constituted Buchon

    Not a replica as such, she is indeed mostly Buchon, a fascinating variant of the 109 in it’s own right.

    I believe she was converted to Gustav standard back in the 80s or 90s and operated by MBB as was then. I understand she was grounded and relegated to static display after a landing accident.

    George

    in reply to: Plessey Breeze crimping tools #1119361
    chippie51
    Participant

    Connectors

    We’ve recently obtained the correct Breeze plug for the Generator for the Fiat. Now, all the plugs I’ve seen available have an open back-end. I’ve never seen any kind of shroud or cover through which the cables would pass before going into the back of the plug and therefore into the actual terminals themselves. Any clarification on this set-up, or indeed examples of the shrouds used on the 5X/6359 four pin plug (if a shroud exists) would be very, very welcome.

    Many thanks,

    G

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 167 total)