Sri Lanka Swordfish remains
It was, if I recall correctly, a gentleman by the name of John Parker of Bognor Regis. It would have been about 1983, Cripes, that long ago? Now I’m feeling old.
G
Fuel Priming Pumps
We have a few bagged fuel priming pumps for the Shack which may be available.
G
Wimpie
You are correct Bruce, she is internally configured as a T10 and it would be a shame to see her bug@ered around with and the original equipment separated from the aeroplane. Members of the public are not allowed within the aeroplane so to a degree, at least from a public perception perspective, her internal configuration is largely irrelevant. However, in external appearance she would be more representative of the day to day RAF Wellingtons in which so many paid the ultimate price if displayed in a simple un-marked night bomber scheme than in silver markings. I wouldn’t profess to be a psychologist by any means, but I would imagine that more people of our generation would stop and perhaps reflect more on what the bomber crews went through while looking at a Wartime configured (turreted) night-bomber marked Wellington than they would if in post-war trainer silver. Sad, but not necessarily something that can be changed.
That said, we should of course all be grateful that she has survived at all, so let’s just be pleased to have her around regardless of what colours she appears in!
G
Wimpy
As I understand it, and I am of course willing to be corrected if not, was she not actually manufactured as a turret equipped bomber? Assuming this is correct I guess that she rolled off the production line in a black bomber scheme, albeit without squadron markings and was presumably initially accepted in such a scheme by the RAF. Would this not be a more suitable scheme for display?
G
Buccs
Interesting, this is the second time in a few months that this question has been asked – the book must be selling a few copies!
Anyway, here’s the answer to the original question:
Just looking at my copy of the book, no serials are ever mentionned, only the aircraft numbers 030 and 021. Although there is a photo in the book with the aircrew standing in front of a buccaneer with the clearly visible serial XN977. A bit of research on the web reveals that 030 was XN977 and 021 was XV154. Both were sadly scrapped in 1991 and 1992 respectively. Shame.
Hope that helps
That is a great shame indeed – I figured they had probably long since expired, but sad to have this confirmed. Does anyone know of the status of the two tankers?
Strange to think that it’s now almost 40 years ago, and almost twenty since they were scrapped. How time passes……
G
Patton film P-51
The P-51 in the Patton film (if it ever appeared in the film – my memory says it didn’t appear on screen) was I believe the Shoreham based Mustang of Charles Masefield. She’s now based near Port Elizabeth in South Africa.
G
Historic Aircraft Connection
There is a connection here to old aeroplanes, beyond the particular microlight in question. Patrick Luscombe was, I understand, heavily involved with the ill-fated British Air Reserve at Lympne and owned the former Southend Sea Fury which is now flying in America.
G
E2B
We need an E2B for the G.46 as well if anyone has a spare. Not standard fit for the Fiat, but it’s small enough to fit in the top of the windscreen out of the way.
Thanks,
G
T3
And if the T3 leaving the UK means that it has an opportunity to take to the air again I can only applaud the transaction that brings that about.
The fact is that there exists a rebuildable Mosquito in Canada which has been relatively unloved for a considerable number of years for which there existed a viable opportunity to have her back in the air. That deal was blocked, partly through the lobbying of folks who quite frankly should have known better. The Mossie is sadly under represented as a flying aeroplane, not just here in the UK, but also across the Atlantic.
So, the good folks of Calgary get to see, eventually, what a Mosquito looks like. What a great shame no one gets to see what a Mossie can actually do when she gets air under her wings. Now, that would have been a bold and worth step. Sadly not to be.
Don’t get me wrong, I have a great deal of admiration for those who will eventually rebuild her for display in Calgary, I wish them every success and if we can help with spares I’ll be pleased to see what we can do. It remains, however, an utter waste of a good aeroplane.
G
Donning Flack Jacket
Just wondering on what basis this can be considered good news. That Mossie represents one of the best opportunities to place a further example back in the air. The museum concerned has held it for a number of years and has made no progress with is – yet a purchaser who comes forward with a viable desire (and means) to get her back in the air is blocked. Now, I know that the plan to get her back in the air involved her being sold to a UK based collector, but surely this should be a secondary factor to her being put back into the air. Yet again a fantastic opportunity has been halted by a small minded attitude.
If it took the export of a static UK located Mossie to another country in order to get one back in the air I’d personally be all for it.
What a wasted opportunity.
G
ps, is there a Canadian equivalent of the “little Englander” phrase?
Alas not
Thanks Tony, had already tried the google approach – alas with no success. Not held in the thicknesses we need.
G
Dove
Thanks Roget, that would be great.
G
Dunlop bits
The first port of call for information was Dunlop, the second was the RAF Museum. Both drew a blank sadly.
OK, a few other numbers:
AHO35387 – brake bag
AHO89474 – brake lining
AHO17411, 27G/4619 – brake bag
27G/4675 – brake bag
and a brake relay valve, Mk III, 27G/2585. Part number appears to be AC12734.
As always, any help much appreciated!
George
Re-constituted Buchon
Not a replica as such, she is indeed mostly Buchon, a fascinating variant of the 109 in it’s own right.
I believe she was converted to Gustav standard back in the 80s or 90s and operated by MBB as was then. I understand she was grounded and relegated to static display after a landing accident.
George
Connectors
We’ve recently obtained the correct Breeze plug for the Generator for the Fiat. Now, all the plugs I’ve seen available have an open back-end. I’ve never seen any kind of shroud or cover through which the cables would pass before going into the back of the plug and therefore into the actual terminals themselves. Any clarification on this set-up, or indeed examples of the shrouds used on the 5X/6359 four pin plug (if a shroud exists) would be very, very welcome.
Many thanks,
G