dark light

PLA-MKII

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,351 through 1,365 (of 1,462 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Don't read this. You won't like it. (Part 2) #2561934
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    :diablo:
    country C’s strategy for the war that never came was numbers overcoming quality shortcomings, low MTBF and dispersal to rugged air bases for nuclear survival. Country A’s was quality over quantity, High MTBF (optimized for peace time), and delicate planes requiring centralized airbase locations (and a prayer that Nuclear War doesn’t happen).

    in reply to: Don't read this. You won't like it. (Part 2) #2561966
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    :diablo:

    country c’s planes where designed for total war on the patterns of WWI and WWII. Country c’s planes where further designed for country c and not country b (duh). Country b was a poor loser country that didn’t have theu $$ to operate them properly or by the BVR missiles or numbers.

    in reply to: Air War Over Iran – Possible Scenarios #2562047
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    well that would also then mean all the Su-27 radar tech is compromised.. then we’re back to square one I guess..

    in reply to: Air War Over Iran – Possible Scenarios #2562175
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    Okay, lets assume we are a country and we want to upgrade F-14s and we have no access to US technology. What are our options? How far can we go?

    PLA-MKII’s expert answer (based on speculation and day dreaming):

    Key would be getting a replacement for AIM-54s. Since radar codes are compromised and non compatible with eastern weapons, radar would also therefore need to be changed. The main question then becomes if, how and what you can replace the tomcats original radars. Not necessarily a MiG-31’s radar but it is open to other radar sets as well. If I recall the Su-27’s radome is comparable to the F-14’s and a slightly larger antenna would be even better and a non issue.

    Second portion of this would be the weapon systems: after such a radar fit both Russian and Chinese weapons would be integratable. Further, all kind of seeker heads and main bodies can be integrated, possibly one which seemingly looks like tha AIM-54 but is a totally different animal.

    the PL-9s would make a nice complement to this XBVRAAMs resulting in a all new new Pheonix rising from the ashes of war, an avenging angel garding golden eggs of nuclear proportions.. 😀

    in reply to: Air War Over Iran – Possible Scenarios #2564830
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    I think the one to deliver is the one who makes the boldest claim. That is actually you. I just stick to the things one can assume from the obvious facts. Those are:
    – Iran has only 1970 and early 1980 fighters
    – Iran has a serious problem with spares and upgrades
    – Iran has not updated its fighter fleet since

    These information might be wrong, but that has to be proven (not other way around). If the information is true (or at least comes close to the truth), scenario will be as I described.

    And I haven’t read any usable post by you since started this discussion, neither any coherent picture of the situation. If I overread anything please point it out.

    Fine, lets have a fair discussion without getting personal. I understand that your H0 hypothesis is:
    – Iran has only 1970 and early 1980 fighters
    – Iran has a serious problem with spares and upgrades
    – Iran has not updated its fighter fleet since

    My H0 hypothesis however is:
    – Iran has had over 1 and half decades to upgrade so its not 1970s tech
    – Iran is self sufficient in spare parts (90% according to ACIG)
    – Iran has the money to uprgade whatever it needs and therefore it surely has.

    What either of us know about iran is very little – none of us here have been there or know people in their high command. we are all speculating, you hold the position that no change has taken place since the 1970s early 1980s while I hold the position that much has changed. read the article posted by berlesconi from acig its a pretty good article on what a more professional analyst thinks, and not necesarily validating either of our positions.

    in reply to: General Discussion #337607
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    Golden Dragon, can’t believe you wasted all that time posting to this idiot 😉

    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    Golden Dragon, can’t believe you wasted all that time posting to this idiot 😉

    in reply to: Air War Over Iran – Possible Scenarios #2566188
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    in terms of reverse engineering on the F-14.. I’ve heard differing reports. US gov’t reports from a few years ago put it around 50% (although they did not list what component they were able to reverse engineer).

    however from articles in air combat information group, put it at a more optomistic number of 90%.. the 10% being primarily the engine and radar. This article here click here says the Tomcats have been upgraded, both the radar and the phoenix missle.

    Great article!

    in reply to: Air War Over Iran – Possible Scenarios #2566203
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    You are just specualting and having wet dreams at night showing an F-22 going down in flames shot down by your personal favorite from whatever country (I guess most preferable would be an F-14, because it would be so ironic). Sorry to disappoint you. But in the old days even the stupid, bad-equipped guy scored some hits. These days are over.

    An airwar can go out 100-0 without a problem (see “Freedom for Galile” 1982). The biggest problem in this case: Can Iran bring 100 aircraft in the air?

    100-0 wet dreams 😀 and yet you conveniently forget that a monkified MiG-25 was the first a2a kill in GWI. My scenario never had any F-22s going down in any case but somehow that magically materialized from nowhere :diablo: Confident, boasting doesnt help your cause; unles syou show some evidence of your said knowledge of Iran’s actual capabilities, I’d assume you’re a bed wetting teen wasting our time here. 🙂

    in reply to: Chinese exports, part III! #2566841
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    CATIC signs contract with Fiji for MA 60

    http://www.catic.com.cn/en/

    hehe thanks to pinko

    in reply to: Chinese exports, part III! #2566881
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    Hi Have a qtn:

    Are there any publicly traded chinese aviation corporation and do they sell civilian light / ultra light planes?

    in reply to: F-22A Raptor's Radar Doubt #2567339
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    Any links for this claim?

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 9 #2567350
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    hmm this looks a bit different than the AL-31 pics I’ve seen.

    in reply to: Air War Over Iran – Possible Scenarios #2567356
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    I think these are some really nice ideas. A reverse engineered f-14 is clearly more likely that a MiG-31 and if they have a russian radar that would mean they could fire the Adder. That would make the Tomcats really really potent.

    I also like the Iran + X factor analogy…

    in reply to: Air War Over Iran – Possible Scenarios #2567633
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    Uh…F-14A maybe? I’d be curious to know how they think the radars were “hooked up” to each other.

    I was actually thinking about that myself.. doesn’t make sense unless they where monitoring radar emissions and seeing if they synched (?) No idea really.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,351 through 1,365 (of 1,462 total)