dark light

Rocketeer

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,481 through 3,495 (of 4,649 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Source and size of Spitfire Frame 5 spar bolts #1216527
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    cheers Stu

    in reply to: Source and size of Spitfire Frame 5 spar bolts #1216969
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    Many thanx Steve…yep those are the ones
    Tony

    in reply to: Defiant cockpit picture #1219940
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    There is the problem Elliot! The pilots notes do not have the cockpit shots (well my orange ones dont!)
    The Battle is another elusive aircraft!

    in reply to: Aviation Archaeology/Wreck Recovery. #1222232
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    Sorry Cees old chap, but you chaps did put some Merlins for sale…..so there is always an exception to the rule? Not digging at you (pardon the pun!) but there are always some cases to prove the rule (I fully understand the reasons for selling the engines – please let us know where they went in the end).

    Personally, I dont believe in selling anything I dig.

    Unfortunately I have had to pay through the nose for crash parts for my projects and collection. If I do not use these I try to pass them on/swap. But sometimes it has to be sold to aid my projects. If I pay £100 for a bag of stuff and use a quarter of it, I have to recoup costs to be able to afford to compete with other bidders. This is a fact of life…but before you criticise, look at the Hurricane project and tell me it is not worthwhile/a tribute to the Few, designers, groundcrew etc.

    The digs I do are always very personal to me and become more so as we unravel the story through research and the final moments. I do try and display as many parts as possible, however, this is the tip of the iceberg the rest is in store. Parts do get provided to other museums/collectors however, I always get an undertaking that I do not want to see the items sold.

    Touchy subject,

    My side of the story (19 years of experience in this field). I am part of the Aircraft Recovery Group 1940-1945 Foundation based at Heemskerk near Amsterdam. Our aim is to locate aircrash-sites from WWII with the aim to locate and recover aircraft wrecks containing missing aircrew regardless of the nationality. This work will only be carried out by the RNethAF and we will give any assistance we can.

    And wreckage recovered will never be sold but put on show at our museum as a memorial to the crew. This serves also as a place where next of kin can visit to see part of their past. This is all done with the utmost respect to the crews, as well as current legislation. We also recover aircraft ourselves that do not contain missing aircrew or UXB but that is also to give the local people who witnessed the crash or were otherwise involved the chance to find out what events led to the crash and it’s recovery.

    No golddigging, no selling of parts etc.

    period

    If anyone of you wish to contribute in this thread remember to keep it civil and if you don’t have any experience such as Kev35, it’s very difficult to judge this sensitive matter. I would like to ask the moderators to be alert and not turn this into another flame war.

    Cheers

    Cees

    http://www.arg1940-1945.nl

    in reply to: Forum #1223136
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    I think this thread has run its course……

    in reply to: Forum #1223432
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    who re-named this thread? not impressed:mad: Bit disrespectful to Merkle the starter of the thread

    in reply to: Forum #1223713
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    Chris

    I suggest you don’t leave on the basis of the other thread. Digging will always be an emotive subject and one that will get some hot under the collar when they do not see the point. I would love to do more digging and believe that recovering certain aircraft are essential to the whole ‘aviation heritage’ story. Just cos someone does not see the point of it does not mean that there is no point. For example, I have never seen why people collect numbers, but it gives alot of people pleasure.

    Regarding digging, as a naiive lad i found all digs distasteful until a friend persuaded me to go on a dig. We drove up to a field with a shallow crater in it. There was nothing to show that 2 brave men had died there the day after VE Day….this got me thinking….there was me, an aviation history buff who did not know about the ultimate sacrifice so how could i expect others and joe-p to know? We recovered the aircraft remains and did various displays to honour the crew. I am now digging an aircraft I am passionate about and the history along with it. Noone can tell me it is not worthwhile as it is crucial and important history to our local history. The policy of sharing digger costs is commonplace. It can be costly.

    Suggest you take a breather and come back old chap. This forum has lots of personalities and is a reflection of the wider community, you cannot expect all to be social, happy or polite. Lord knows there are probably several out there in forumland who don’t like me….I don’t care! As long as I have, do and continue to do my bit for aviation heritage they can say what they like!

    in reply to: Chaz Bowyer #1227418
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    Like many others on here and in the UK, my first book on aircraft was by the great man himself….it was a huge book on the RAF History and was full of great photos that really got me into aviation heritage. Condolescences to family and friends…..Blue skies Chaz

    in reply to: Supermarine Spiteful, what are the possibilities #1227887
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    I have a Spiteful canopy!

    in reply to: BAE Hawk Parts Required #1228755
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    cheers all

    in reply to: BAE Hawk Parts Required #1228911
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    cheers Dave, I will ask the boss!

    in reply to: BAE Hawk Parts Required #1228942
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    I’ve got a good canopy (without frame) if you are interested.

    Anon

    cheers but so have we! somewhere there must be some frames!!!!

    in reply to: Bristol Sycamore Cheek Perspex #1229003
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    dunno yet…..just trying to get moulds first!

    in reply to: Newark Cockpit Fest #1229173
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    Tony,

    ….although i don’t recall being asked to attend ’08, and my info’ pack seems to have been mis-laid (perhaps the snail mail and email had gremlins ?), i will make a concerted effort to attend next year.

    Far from being a “negative thread”, this has in fact helped me and at least one other “virgin” to now seriously consider it. Although it’ll certainly be a low key affair, as i personally would not be attending to win anything, not even a plastic cup. Perhaps bring a Chippax to end the Chipmunk drought ? And quite probably still in it’s as found ‘barn find’ condition.

    That said, i still have many questions, most of which are probably in the info’ pack… security, accomodation, even the criteria (if any) for the exhibit/s, etc, etc….

    As a ‘virgin’ outsider i don’t perceive the event to be in crisis, and hope i haven’t given that impression myself. On the contrary, Bruce broke the mould when he stepped up to openly ask why ‘virgins’ don’t attend. My main concern is the ‘award culture’, a view seemingly shared perhaps ? But if i deliberately don’t bring something you can eat dinner off… it won’t matter :diablo:

    .

    I look forward to sharing some bottles of Spitfire with you Dave and any other ‘virgins’, cockpitfest or otherwise who attend!:diablo:

    in reply to: Newark Cockpit Fest #1229377
    Rocketeer
    Participant

    I am saddened that this thread gives the idea that so many cockpiteers were disappointed with this year’s cockpitfest….this was not the case. This thread seems to be a bit of a put off to owners which is a hideous pity. I love the Fest, have attended all of them, my girls love the event, it is very family based and fun, Newark & Flypast do us proud with a place for tents, nice hog roast etc. The aeroboot is fun and the friendships great. I spend alot of time trying to encourage people to attend who have not done so before. I will have climbed ‘my everest’ when I can get a prolific cockpit owner like XM692 to attend!

    They don’t know what they are missing.
    On the subject of prizes, I do like the idea of cups or even a plaque for each attendee (like you get at car rallies etc). But no-one should attend for a prize, cos youll probably be disappointed.

    Oh and BTW I was the evil person who suggested a sub theme (note the word sub) of a Hunter gathering with 11 Hunters turning up…so blame me for that, not anyone else. One positive was that I could encourage owners of rare mks to attend to make the line up complete.
    Bill has already said that next year’s landmark 10th will have no themes at all (other than displays by owners). Please come one and all.

    I understand Stu’s views and would hate to see him or any other of the characters, or potential attendees be put off this fabulous event.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,481 through 3,495 (of 4,649 total)