I will be at Legends and would be delighted to chat to fellow raks!!
The Chinook will always be my favourite….something fantastic about it, it is the Thompson Helicopter….does exactly what it says in the can and more! From wingovers to low level/NOE to ramp riding around the valleys to landing on the water…yep gets my vote…but I am biased!!!
Interesting views in this thread….my personal feeling is that a building should not detract from the exhibits is is displaying…..the AAM building does…but that is MY OPINION and lets face it…I am the world’s leading expert on my opinion!!
I do not wish to decry Duxford, but it has lost its way somewhat recently (displacing founding fathers EAG and building butt ugly design statement buildings on what was a delightful airfield and creating taboo-visitor free areas). Sure I know we need to embrace change, but not all change is for the better…we are into preserving aircraft, not creating wacky buildings.
To the poster who said that the AAM would not have happened if the building did not look like that…is that REALLY true?
They have in the most improved the museum, but part of the HLF is to make culture/museums more accessible….not sure that was done in this case (quite expensive to visit). It is amazing what a several smaller museums could do with those millions.
Still, Duxford remains my fav all round UK aviation museum
Thats FT375 shown in the photo. Sold at a Sotherby’s Auction in the 90s and now I believe living in Italy. KF183 is still based at Boscombe Down with the A&AEE (or whatever its called these days).
As to the dreaded groundloop….well it happens at one stage or another in everyone’s Harvard careers. I have witnessed it first hand from the backseat on a number of occasions.
Martin
FT375 had the most interesting history, but KF183 is still plying her trade at the MoD airfield at Boscombe Down…the official name is ATEC – Aircraft Test & Evaluation Centre which is made up of a service element and a QinetiQ element.
i think some of the WW2 made RAF books have phots of air gunners using them on models to record accuracy before being let on real guns!
The AAM is ugly as is the land warfare hall as will be the expanded superhangar, they are not in keeping with this delightful airfield. However, they do get the exhibits (or some of them) undercover.
The latter is good, but the former is pants and a pity. They could have put up a nice WW1 replica hangar where the BoB film people blew up the last and some nice modern repros of T2’s. This would have been in keeping with the airfield’s original 30s/40s appeal and allowed the airfield to still get some revenue from the film industry and be appealing to the eye. Sorry, just my opinion.
Duxford should be like Hullavington..a conservation area..no need for daft faddy buildings.
Regarding the without the AAM blah it would be housing….er NO! I applaud the fund raising by all on both sides of the Pond that led to the AAM, but a memorial just as nice could have been created with period type buildings.
cheers…..I think I may have filled it since… (fantasy of flt, disney etc)
Yes the Canberra nose is for the Aeropark, owned by one of our members. It will be on display next to WH740 Canberra.
I believe the serial for her is WH876.
James B
Dont think its WH876 as we would never let her go!! It was the spare PR
I thought this was the one that came from Nova Scotia? Incidentally, nice to see Pima have a Hurri
if you don’t mind losing the finish, sandblast it and repaint it. Otherwise cleaning with water, let dry and paint with varnish?
DONT sandblast it!!! Dont use polyeurethane varnish as itwill yellow
OK i had a bit of a look for part numbers etc with a magnifying glass. on the bracket that has the hing on it, there is a small number starting with a very tiny:
2 then 28584-9-4any ideas???
Wellington Bomber
use a acrylic satin lacquer and that will stop the corrosion (or slow it!)
Nice photos,I have just flown back (was at Fantasy of Flight on Sunday) mucho fun…will post a photo or two if anyone wants…the lovebugs were a pain, though I and the girlfriend enjoyed ourselves. For an all round museum, you cannot beat Kermits imaginitive museum.
Sadly Kermit could not fly as he was in New Zealand….ummmm?!
Can I take it that you are less than impressed with the quality of the mechandising at your typical Dx airshow; I think they do a very nice line in see through RAF ensigns, and kiddies flying jackets made from inside out poodles; (probably humanely starved to death)
Tee hee!
And to answer a previous post, to get a 40ft container airborne at an airshow all you need is a Chinook! 😉
Maybe it contains 100,000 inflatable spitfires and a million rubber dog poos for sale on the stalls?!!
Beaut…was Peter Wood there too?