What do you need to do with it? We hire out our Trident for film work, and you wouldnt have to buy it either!
PM me if interested
Bruce
Or Gary Spoors maybe able to help with a 707….he is on the International Cockpit Collectors Club Website
very nice Kev, I can feel the slight chill in the air after a sunny day from here!!
I have got a feeling it may be 44-6923 piloted by 1st Lt Donald A Mackeller…anyone know the precise location of this aircraft crash?
Cheers Moggy, the Alresford aircraft was the one I hoped it was, but we got some details from the digger that it came down near Grafton Underwood…he has mislaid the details!!!! Arghh!
It was in June last year Dave….and looking in their hangar there is no room and they have no plans of putting it inside. As you rightly say it is a shame
regards
Tony
No he doesnt – AIRSAM is owned by Karel Bos; Guy does have his own stocks though.
Thanx for the correction. 🙂
Just remembered that in the late seventies / early eighties this was also brought up. Restorations (or overhauls as they were usually then) were also hampered by the lack of these parts. AIRSAM (former Methodical Engineers or Parker Aviation) at Bentfleet has a large warehouse but their prices are rather out of reach of most collectors. I know HFL get their spares from this source, am I right?
Cheers
Cees
Guy Black owns this stuff now
Boscombe Down AC have the foward fus of an F2 too…cannot remember tail number at mo’
I believe this is a really serious issue for restorers and the previous post comment on collectors touches on an aspect of this whole business which I find very serious but for which I have no answer.
Being down here in NZ I wonder what people in other places have to say on this issue.
Let’s say I’m a collector (and I admit some of this is a bit of generalisation so forgive me but it is based on observation over time) I tend to collect the items that express action. So I go for how high, how fast, and the like so altimeters, rev counters, asi’s etc are my thing.
Equally I tend to buy them to put on a shelf and so I’m only going to buy a few. So I’m prepared to go to a reasonably highish level of cost as I’m not doing it every week so I go to say $NZ120 or so per instrument I’ll buy.
Now if I’m a restorer, as I am with a volunteer society, I have to find a complete set of specific insturments for a given aircraft. In my case I’m hunting down the 45 or so for a Lockheed Hudson so straight line maths says I need to spend of the order of $NZ6000 for the aircraft set.
So what is happening now is the collectors are driving up the price (especially if you end up in auction situations) but also to a degree taking the items out of circulation as it were. Equally people see a market for items of a certain type so they offer them up but what happens to the others (eg who can do me a Cambridge fuel ratiometer as opposed to the much easier to find turn and slip)?
I wonder what people think of this topic? I’m not for one minute denying the collectors their right to their hobby but I wonder about the greater good for the world and the museum aspect of it all.
Thoughts greatfully appreciated (offers of instruments and other gear even more so!).
Unfortunately it is more or less impossible to sort out the needy from the collectors. I once let a youngster have a Spitfire spade grip for peanuts…saw it on a sale stall a month later….folk will try and get as much for items as they can….pity really. Having said that, many times I have been given items for my projects because people know I am genuine.
Thanks Ross,
Very interesting
I suppose I missed the most important question, could the item I found be from a Spifire?
Regards,
Jon
Yes, the stainless bolts and peening were Spit type manufacturing processes (and other aircraft)…the yellow paint is most probably jointing compound
Didnt the ex Plane Sailing one go to Ireland? Leaving the ex Greenpeace at Lee ?
JDK, thanks for the info on the hook.
It was in an article by Airbedane that mentioned the CoG problems and replacement with a fibreglass one.
I must admit, all the times I’ve looked around the aircraft at OW, I’ve never taken a good look at the hook!
Rocketeer, interesting what you say about the Hurricane having neutral stablity. It seems that the Sea Hurricane didn’t as in the same article IIRC, Airbedane mentions that the Pilots Notes for the Sea Hurricane hint at instablity with phrases such as “It is difficult to trim the aircraft to fly hands off” & “the aircraft will tighten and tends to ‘tuck in’ during turns.
I haven’t got the article to hand, but recall that he said this was true of Z7015 without the original hook and it’s gear fitted. Regarding the ‘tuck in’ during turns, from what I’ve heard, the land based equivilant had this problem too, and come to think of it, I recall John Allison mentioning on an airshow video that the Hurricane was dynamically unstable in pitch.
It would be interesting to hear what Airbedane has to say about how the Vacher Hurricane handles (I’m sure he’s flown it), which is supposed to have a more aft CoG than other flying examples because of all the stock military equipment and guns etc.
Cheers
Paul
The difficulty in trimming the aircraft hands off would be a characteristic of neutral stability too. Tucking in during turns is interesting. Certainly a characteristic of the Typhoon, that is until the mother of all bob weights was added to increase stick force per g.
Abidane’s comments would be most welcome. The ex Charlie Church Hurricane was interesting in the longitudinal plane from my discussions with Dave Southwood at the time. I had not really thought about cofg position with the Mk1/Sea Hurri, but I suppose it is obvious that a Mk1 would be further aft only by nature of the MerlinIII being less heavy/different moment arm to the XX! Thanx to all for getting my grey cells working on a fixed wing issue and its relation to my beloved Hurri!!! Makes a change from me doing stab & control for helios!!!
I’m not directly involved with IWM or Shuttleworth,but I’m certain the collection now have full ownership,and have done for a few years. IIRC,when she was first flown she proved to be rather tail-heavy so the operating gear for the hook was removed,so I don’t think the hook has ever been used since her service days. Am I right in thinking it’s the type of hook that can only be retracted by hand once the aircraft is on the deck/ground? Would plow quite a furrow in the OW turf! 🙂
Hurricanes tend to be neutrally stable longitudinally!! I thought I’d seen a phot of the hook down…but I am getting old now!!! Lots of modern aircraft with hooks for RHAGs have to have the hook ‘retracted’ on the ground. I should know about the hook, tho’ my hurri speciality is in Mk1 & 2 aircraft
This beauty is the top falcon on an airfield in North America. He is a Red Tailed Falcon at Shearwater that has the best kill ratio. He leaves the truck at 110mph and has a Choc Lab who protects him when he is on the ground with the kill.
This beauty is the top falcon on an airfield in North America. He is a Red Tailed Falcon at Shearwater that has the best kill ratio. He leaves the truck at 110mph and has a Choc Lab who protects him when he is on the ground with the kill.