The August 2002 Aeroplane Monthly article quotes Steve Hinton as saying “If you get rid of those huge underwing radiators and installed a boil-off system,it would be a real contender” (for air racing) He added that since the discussion about the time-to-climb record, “both the Spitfire and myself have aged. Currently I don’t see any reason to press the equipment”.
Steve is one man in historic aviation with NOTHING to prove!
Four views of Howard Pardue’s aircraft, this time wearing “13”. All taken on 23 May 2001 in HP’s hangar at Stevens County Airport, Breckenridge, Texas. Laurie.
Always nice to see a correctly proportioned RAF roundel Stateside!
Can anyone smell fish?
Stormin – you spoiled it!
Good spotters on here eh BWB don’t even know where TFC is housed I allways thought they were based in the T2
Ah ‘Terminator 2’, thats it!
OK lets.
Nah BWB, first answer is not correct – somebody does know! 😀
OK – lets make it easier. The original link posted was to a photo in an unofficial Duxford website. The photo was posted under the title of ‘Hangar 2’. That’s how we know it was taken in Hangar 2 (the presence of the TFC P-47 in the shot just confirms it).
One for HFL, perhaps?
Not if its in Hangar 2!
Hi Bruce, me too. I assumed it would never actually go through the permit application process but that placement on the UK register for a short time may ease its transition through the paperwork to France. We shall see.
I have always put this one in a special catergory as it is a completely authentic external shape. The original book was entertaining and liberally punctuated with “and then we went down to the pub”, Clive obviously appreciates his local brew.
Vintage fabrics is Clive’s company and I believe he was involved with providing material for the re-paint
Yes please – the more shots the better. Not sure what you mean by ‘Battle of Britain’ as being a supplier of stencils as they are always custom cut. The W/T is certainly a copy of Cilve Denney’s one as there are many variations and that style is identical to his.
I’d never noticed before that the rear glazing behind the canopy is either faired or painted over, which probably explains the longer-looking fuselage.
I also think that the aerial mast (not fitted) does something to break up the flowing lines of the fuselage, too, and if not fitted makes for a sleeker aircraft. But that’s just me… :rolleyes:
Good observations – agreed.
I have always taken it to be ‘6S’. The W/T on 959 looks like one of Clive’s! Nice to see some original stencil shots too.