dark light

Mark V

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,386 through 2,400 (of 2,768 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Whats happening with the OFMC aircraft? #1612559
    Mark V
    Participant

    Corsair and P-40 are at Ardmore, NZ now. La-9 is on the way. The Spitfire MH434 remains at Duxford as does the Mustang operated by OFMC.

    in reply to: Forum Members, Who Are we? #1615486
    Mark V
    Participant

    Originally posted by bentwingbomber
    Me and a local ex painter spotted some roundels on the floor the other day were they yours?????

    No they were mine actually (in Hangar 5)!

    in reply to: Forum Members, Who Are we? #1617052
    Mark V
    Participant

    I started early! This is me circa 1974…..

    in reply to: He111 tailfin at Duxford #1809309
    Mark V
    Participant

    Dave T – did you do it? :rolleyes:

    in reply to: He111 tailfin at Duxford #1814367
    Mark V
    Participant

    Does the webmaster block out the word aeroplane or only when it has a capital letter at the front – Aeroplane?

    in reply to: One for RAF historians #1823973
    Mark V
    Participant

    Originally posted by Dan Johnson
    Just to add fuel to the fire 🙂

    Explain these two from 1941. Found in the Hawker Hurricane Mk.1/IV in Royal Air Force & Foreign Service by Richard Ward
    from the old Arco-Aircam Aviation series.

    Dan

    Replacement port wing on the Hurricane in the lower photo?

    in reply to: Airworthy Hurricanes #1824129
    Mark V
    Participant

    Thanks for that Glenn 🙂

    in reply to: chailey airshow 2004 #1824156
    Mark V
    Participant

    Certainly does!

    in reply to: WW2 pilots flying warbirds #1824186
    Mark V
    Participant

    Originally posted by Mike J
    …and not fot the last time either. The very same Buchon received similar damage in an incident at Duxford during filming of ‘Pearl Harbor’ a couple of years ago!

    Nope – it was at Lydd.

    in reply to: Old photos taken at Duxford(2004 Zombie) #1824429
    Mark V
    Participant

    I loved the ‘Detroit Miss’ scheme too and was baffled at the re-paint until Col. Anderson flew the aircraft over Leiston and it all made sense. This was such a historic moment, probably the last time a WWII ace flew over the UK in the type of aircraft he fought in.

    in reply to: One for RAF historians #1824494
    Mark V
    Participant

    Originally posted by VoyTech

    JDK, you are wrong (If I understood correctly the long word with ‘counter…’ at the beginning ;)). There was a Fighter Command signal sent in late June/early July (if my memory serves me) defining the white bands to be applied on noses and tails; then another one a few days later, making it clear to everyone that the white stripes on tail should be across not along the tailplane;

    V.

    Thats an impressivley long memory you have there VoyTech. I sense you and JDK are actually in agreement on the issue that the so-called Dieppe invasion stripes were not actually applied for the August 19th operation and that most, if not all, aircraft that were adorned with them earlier that Summer had them removed prior to Operation Jubilee.

    in reply to: Failsworth yard Manchester(old thread 2005) #1824715
    Mark V
    Participant

    Hi Cestrian,

    These are fabulously interesting images, thank you for posting them. Can you tell us more about how you gained access to the yard and what became of it. It has been mentioned several times that the yard was ‘cleared’. What did that entail and what became of the airframes?

    Thanks in anticipation.

    in reply to: News From Flug Werk – Wow! #1824961
    Mark V
    Participant

    I heard the 190 has finally flown. Any report/links anyone?

    in reply to: Warbird registrations #1825476
    Mark V
    Participant

    The CAA will issue a notice waiving the requiremnt to display a civil registration on an historic aircraft after a succesful appplication. There are rules associated with this concession including the historic accuracy of the paint scheme and the necessary avoidance of anything that could bring the represented service in to disrepute. The amount of information requested in support of the application varies from aircraft to aircraft. Strangely there is no such facility in the USA

    in reply to: Tropical filters ommited – why? #1825495
    Mark V
    Participant

    Re: Tropical filters ommited – why?

    Originally posted by Chris Broad
    Hello chaps,
    I was just wondering why modern restorations of warbirds don’t seem to ever have tropical filters fitted.
    TIA

    Very simple – its because they are very ugly and do nothing for performance. Coupled with the fact that they would have to be specially fabricated means that they are just never done.
    These factors have overuled the historic accuracy factor.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,386 through 2,400 (of 2,768 total)