dark light

Mark V

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 991 through 1,005 (of 2,768 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Fighter Collection Spit Mk.XVIII #1200777
    Mark V
    Participant

    Nice shot – shows the ‘proper’ Ocean Grey to good effect too ๐Ÿ™‚

    in reply to: Spitfire XVI SL574 #1202381
    Mark V
    Participant

    Why would anyone offer to exchange a ‘fully restored’, albeit static Mk V for a static (unrestored) Mk XVI? ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

    in reply to: Hangar 11 Hurricane Progress #1206487
    Mark V
    Participant

    I take it the blanks over the exhaust ports are to keep moisture and foreign objects out? I was not aware that the Hurricane had a fuel tank between the engine and the cockpit, I always thoought the Hurricane’s fuel was all carried in wing tanks. Oh well, that’s something new learned.

    First question – yes. Second question -nearly right, the majority of fuel is carried in the centre section tanks, either side of the cockpit. The fuselage fuel tank between cockpit and engine is officially termed the ‘reserve tank’ and holds 28 gallons of fuel.

    Not quite old enough to have had any personal dealings with them you see.

    ๐Ÿ˜ฎ You dont have to be that old Mike!

    in reply to: Hangar 11 Hurricane Progress #1207969
    Mark V
    Participant

    Any news about the covering, anyone?

    Its still Irish linen! ๐Ÿ™‚

    in reply to: LA564 Seafire Disposal #1215452
    Mark V
    Participant

    what an extraordinary post (#1). These aircraft are largely privately owned and the owner can, within the law, do whatever he likes with his property. I have lost count of the number of aircraft I have worked on (voluntarily) that have been subsequently sold by their owners. But its just part of life in this business, something that if you volunteer your time you have to accept as being a probability. In fact, come to think of it I have woked on some aircraft for several different owners, most recently Spitfire BL628, so just because the aircraft is sold it does not mean that your input necessarily ends.

    I do this for the aircraft, to preserve history, simple as that. Historic aircraft change hands, just as simple.

    in reply to: WWII – RAF bomb fusing unit query #1216061
    Mark V
    Participant

    Thank you for the kind and helpful responses received so far ๐Ÿ™‚

    in reply to: Fighter Collection Spit Mk.XVIII #1216065
    Mark V
    Participant

    This is a general question, what is the purpose of the yellow leading edges?

    Identifies an RAF aircraft in a head on situation (and stops you walking in to the wing at night).

    in reply to: WWII – RAF bomb fusing unit query #1216337
    Mark V
    Participant

    PM sent ๐Ÿ™‚

    in reply to: Fighter Collection Spit Mk.XVIII #1216453
    Mark V
    Participant

    It looks fantastic. Tell the nit pickers to go and buy their own planes!

    I dont see too many ‘nit-pickers’ here – there is nothing wrong with asking polite questions about any scheme, its not beyond discussion. Yes, in this case the scheme was very thoroughly researched and several contributers to this thread were involved in that research and with providing detailed markings and colour information to TFC. They always take the research side of scheme application very seriously as has been shown in numerous superb restorations over many years.

    in reply to: Fighter Collection Spit Mk.XVIII #1218675
    Mark V
    Participant

    the black stripes on the back looked a bit wonky, were pics taken before the stripes were completely unmasked?

    Look perfect to my eye – in these roll out shots http://fighter-collection.com/pages.php

    in reply to: BBMF spit loses "Something" yesterday.. Pilot ok. #1219375
    Mark V
    Participant

    Methinks you’ve kinda mis-read my last post there, Mark V…

    I did indeed – but lets leave it there as a shameless plug for the Haynes Lancaster book!

    in reply to: Airworthy Sea Furys #1222558
    Mark V
    Participant

    ….which isn’t a Sea Fury, it’s a Fury ISS.:rolleyes:

    Now come on Lee – your splitting hairs – thats why I used the word ‘representative’ ๐Ÿ™‚ I know you!

    in reply to: Airworthy Sea Furys #1224288
    Mark V
    Participant

    RNHF’s VR930 is temporarily grounded awaiting a re-built Centaurus, their new T.20 has yet to fly. This leaves John Bradshaws aircraft as the sole currently airworthy representative.

    in reply to: BBMF spit loses "Something" yesterday.. Pilot ok. #1224395
    Mark V
    Participant
    in reply to: Revised UK ANO – EASA Permits to Fly #1224413
    Mark V
    Participant

    It certainly will!! It will, for example, mean that the Flug Werke FW-190 will get a permit to fly in the UK based on itยดs German permit.

    I am not so sure you are correct.

Viewing 15 posts - 991 through 1,005 (of 2,768 total)