there is historical precedent for the “Grace” dual canopy configuration.
Spit IX UTIs converted by the Russians during the Second World War used this configuration. Paint red stars on a Spit restored with this double canopy modification and you have a perfectly original configuration…..
A nearly original configuration – the Russians did not move the front cockpit forward by 13.5 inches as the later Vickers conversion.
Its an interesting project, the days of DIY Spitfire re-builds in the UK seemed over when the more stringent regulations pertaining to certification of permit aircraft came in to being in the 90’s. I wonder which organisation Mr Philips is in collaboration with regarding the CAA certification/approval process as now only one of the few companies holding A8/20 E4 can apply for a first permit to fly (this legislation effectivley ended the DIY/sign off by a licenced enginneer method of the 70’s and 80’s).
Good luck to him in any case, it will be great to see ‘232 back where she belongs.
its the time of year in which old aeroplanes get fettled.. I dont believe its anymore sinister than that.. 😉
So the information on the airfield/museum operator’s website quote in post 2 is wrong then?
Has she been temporarily flown out of EK for the winter or has Maurice Bayliss decided to base his Spit. elsewhere – if so …… any particular reason behind the decision.
From the site you quoted: “Final Departure
The Spitfire takes off from East Kirkby for the last time. Spitfire MJ627 has left East Kirkby for the last time as it is relocated to another airfield.”
I remember Nixon did a red engine for Eddie Coventry for TD248, I prefer black Merlins myself….
Me too – IIRC the red finish is a bit of a VV-12’s trade mark (whatever floats your vessel). The multi-coloured example reminds me of the Allison scheme for the Red Bull P-38. http://www.ezellaviation.com/Past%20Pages/P38/engfit.html
Hi Lee, I would like to PM you but your inbox is not allowing any more PMs (full)
Cheers,
SFF
Just shows you how popular he is! 🙂
Very nice – any more shots of the Hastings in its new scheme (or a link) please?
Hi, Why is AR213 is to be painted in colours applicable to it’s marks “Finest Hour” (1940) when she was built in july 1941 ?
I did mention paint to Tom when I was at booker 2 weeks ago but have forgotten what he said !Steve
As Eddie said but its all about the construction date of the aircraft. When it left the Westland factory it would have been painted Dark Earth/Dark Green (upper surfaces) and Sky (lower surfaces). Literaly a few weeks after arriving at her first service unit the Air Ministry issued orders for Dark Earth to be over-painted in a new colour, Ocean Grey and for the lower surfaces to be painted Medium Sea Grey. Both schemes are therfore correct for ‘213 depending on the period one wishes to portray. As Tom W told us, the owner has selected the original delivery scheme which was largely unchanged from the typical 1940 Battle of Britain era schemes of the previous year. I suspect this selection was made as the colours emphasise the unique position of ‘213 as an airworthy Mk 1 Spitfire while at the same time being correct for the airframe itself.
he encouraged me to build a Tiger Mouth.
That would present some interesting possibilities 😮
I Believe that Maurice Hammond does a fine Job to the point of flying his work!
He does indeed – and that confidence is shared by a number of other operators!
So Here is an idea folks all of you looking for a PO-2 why not contact Jerry Yeagan.
Its Yagen by the way – do you think he would be able to help?
That’s not Jersey Aviation is it? I thought they went out of business some years ago, around 1996/7.
They are still in business but as Y11F says – only for the supply of parts rather than overhauls.
Sorry to keep on about this…. But!
The Booker Mk1a G-AIST/AR213 will look almost exactly like this (albeit different codes/serial) when painted unless they put the nose stripes ON!
Sadly not.
I just can’t see what the owners are scared of.
LR, I do not think they are ‘scared’ of anything. They are simply selecting an authentic scheme which this aircraft wore shortly after she was constructed. If a ‘fake’ scheme was being selected I could understand the concern but the chosen scheme is correct for the aircraft and consists of colours that are more closely associated with the Mk 1 as a type and its ‘finest hour’ (1940). The OG/DG scheme, is although correct, authentic and interesting, associated with a later period of WWII history and was a unit applied scheme rather than how she was originally finished on leaving the factory.
The last I heard, AR213 will be in dark earth/dark green/sky when the paint is finished. Since the wings were painted last year, the decision has been made to change away from the later scheme, more’s the pity… I know that Tom lobbied extensively for the “bounce” scheme, but it was not to be.
Quite correct Eddie.
Fascinating stuff 🙂
Was there not also another P.2 involved? I’m sure one of the French-based examples still flies around these days in its “Indy” warpaint, or at least is painted up like the one in the film… :confused:
Daz – you have hi-jacked the thread – why not start a fresh one on the P-2? 🙂
Gentlemen as you mention it, this is the actual “star” of that film
I remember her well 🙂 – lovely photo Keith, where & when was it taken please?