dark light

Mark V

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 2,768 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Goodwin Sands Dornier progress thread #1009281
    Mark V
    Participant

    It must be coming up soon as the RAFM at Hendon are having the outline of a DO-17 painted in the bomber command hall??y

    No – its been painted on the ground – in the car park, outside the BoB Hall.

    in reply to: Sea Fury/Centaurus Engine Oil #934458
    Mark V
    Participant

    So what did the ‘U’ stand for – unobtainable?

    in reply to: Hawker Hurricane P2902 (G-ROBT) #934493
    Mark V
    Participant

    Some lovely roll-out shots of G-ROBT – taken late last summer but only just noticed them on the HRL website 🙂

    http://www.hawker-restorations-ltd.co.uk/_images/_current/robt/Current/robt.html

    in reply to: Is this a spitfire propellor #935880
    Mark V
    Participant

    The people who have responded to your question know their stuff – you can be certain!

    in reply to: Hurricane G-CBOE for sale #941067
    Mark V
    Participant

    Yes they built I’s also – I meant that the Canadian built Mk.IIB was in effect re-numbered XII later on in production. The Hangar 11 machine for example is a CCF built IIB.

    in reply to: Lockheed P-38 Lightning #941441
    Mark V
    Participant

    What the about the issue of gaining access to a microfilm reader?

    in reply to: Hurricane G-CBOE for sale #941703
    Mark V
    Participant

    I thought that the Canadian Hurricanes were the higher Mk numbers like XII not a IIB

    The CCF produced machines were originally known as IIB’s but later production was re-numbered.

    in reply to: Lockheed P-38 Lightning #943804
    Mark V
    Participant

    43-2195 – Your set of drawings are on microfilm reels I presume? Thanks.

    in reply to: The War Store, South Africa #944643
    Mark V
    Participant

    Apparently the only Me 262 in a museum.

    Its the only Me 262 in a museum in South Africa!

    in reply to: Battle of Britain medal 'clasp' #944651
    Mark V
    Participant

    You can re-size images with Microsoft image re-sizer – you download it from MS website under ‘Power Toys’. Once loaded you just right click on an image and select the size you want and it creates a duplicate in that size 🙂

    in reply to: Battle of Britain medal 'clasp' #945092
    Mark V
    Participant

    Andy – any chance of a scan of Part II of that article – thanks for posting it – very interesting!

    Just an observation from reading Pt. 1 – the originals (article states) were made from copper – the OP’s clasp looks new and golden in colour….

    in reply to: Questions for the Experts- Spitfire parts stenciling #955568
    Mark V
    Participant

    There is a belief among many modelers that (at least at some point) have not used any primer on the metal parts of the Spitfire, as abandoned painting of “invisible” sections of interior surfaces.
    Regs
    FzJgr

    CBAF built Mk.IX’s had bare metal rear fuselages – at least PT879 does anyway and I have seen other examples in photos. Interestingly all her internal wing structure is painted silver.

    in reply to: Questions for the Experts- Spitfire parts stenciling #956050
    Mark V
    Participant

    I also would like to know what is “S.A.L.65” in dashed rectangle (IWM Spitfire Mk.I). Looks like quality-control stamp (?)

    I would concur with that (an inspection marking).

    in reply to: Questions for the Experts- Spitfire parts stenciling #957772
    Mark V
    Participant

    The stencilling you refer to was used to identify the source, assembly serial number and finish of major components such as rudder, elevators, flaps etc:

    DTD – Directorate of Technical Development
    6S – Air Ministry Code for Supermarine
    SAL – Supermarine Aviation Limited
    CBAF – Castle Bromwich Aircraft Factory

    DTD 308C – to denote use of a cellulose based paint to DTD specification 308.

    In this context, Westland seemed to use the lettering WASP for Spitfires and WASE for Seafires as far as I can determine!

    Off the top of my head so hopefully just about correct!

    in reply to: Hurricane AE977 #988776
    Mark V
    Participant

    This is good to see (the Hurricane gaining deserved public exposure in increasing numbers) but these aircraft being based here sadly does not guarantee any ‘dream’ airshow scenarios. That requires the airshow organisers to percieve the public demand, reach out to the operators and book aircraft in advance in numbers and at not inconsiderable expense.

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 2,768 total)