Please do tell – these guys need to plan their busy schedule over the next few weeks and if there is something they should know it would be only fair to inform them.
Wow – I was particularly impressed by the spares package:
Engine – 5 hrs on test bench
Propeller
1 set of spark plugs
Magneto
Starter
Generator
Vickers Hydraulic Pump
Oil Radiator
Oil Tank
Canopy
Complete engine cowlings
Main Landing Gear
Landing Gear Doors
Tail Wheel assy complete
Set of Wing Tips
All moving parts:
Ailerons
Flaps
Elevator
Rudder
Fixed horizontal stabilizer
Assorted set of smaller parts
If it was a Spitfire that would be a substantial project in its own right!
Oh dear, Mark V. Never mind.
Definately not – I am entitled to my opinion the same as anyone else, prefer the phrase U/S myself 🙂
Someone here has mentioned it’s gone ‘tech’.
I really hate that phrase.
NOT coming to an airport near me!:(
Thought for the day. If “all” the glaciers and icecaps are melting, how did she come to be 265′ under the ice in a paltry 60 years?
Dont believe everything the scientists tell you. Apparantly its even deeper now. When you can walk up and dust of the snow from the the P-38’s lying on the surface in some future year, then I will believe them.
Any idea of the ETA at Duxford?
Yes, yes, of course I know who he is, but I would suggest that despite the press reports and the Biggin commentator we are talking about the facilitator here rather than the end user.
Mark.
This is what I hear too.
During the war there were stories of planes suddenly dropping from these heights,with pilots falling unconscious, due to they supposed oxygen running out, and or freezing and fracturing of essential pipes. Sometimes pilots managed to wake up with just a few thousand feet spare, but sadly apparently many didn’t.
Any one know any more?
Thats it – in a nutshell, oxygen starvation is the biggest risk. Of course, so long as the oxygen system works properly inadverdant flight in to terrain (ie hitting the ground) is less of a risk due to the altitude. Checking reality, here in the UK, Permit catergory aircraft (ex military aircraft such as Spitfires and Mustangs etc) are only cleared for daylight VFR flight so gaining altitude without breaking the rules and getting down again may cause problems, oxygen or not!
It can be different in the USA of course, as most Mustangs are, for example, registered in the ‘Limited’ category which permits flight over 100% cloud cover (no visual contact with the ground). This can present its own risks – I recall three or four years ago two unfortunate people had to bale out of a P-51 named ‘Glamorous Glen’ after the engine stopped during a period when they were transiting over cloud which was over a forested area (no possibility of a forced landing).
As some of you know I work in the Middle East, my boss has asked me to find him a non airworthy Spitfire (no Joke!), where do I start looking?
please don’t say ebay!
If you are talking about a real (ie non replica/FSM) Spitfire and one that is complete, recognisable and sitting on its wheels this is probably the hardest thing to find of all. If you wish to purchase a flyable aircraft there are opportunities or even if you are looking for a basket case restoration project (that may not necessarily be even recognisable as a Spitfire to a lay person) there are one or two potentially available. The reason is that such a relativley complete but static example is the best place to start an airworthy re-build project and as a consequence they are now comparitivley scarce. The last big batch of static airframes were the RAF gate guards that were released in the early 1990’s. There are of course many static examples remaining in museums throughout the world but they are not normally available for sale and when they (rarely) do they command high prices.
Particularly does anyone know when oxygen was last used at altitude in prop driven fighters.
A couple of years ago in the US. Two P-51’s with portable oxygen equipment went up to an altitude at which contrails form and the event was filmed. See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFYzHfjTGtk
It was just done for the amusement of it really but the footage is pretty impressive.
Artwork & stencils for the painting of Spitfire BL628.
Wow I need to find another hobby:)
Yes – you have said more than enough :p – 3,500 posts amounts to a small book. Better quit while you are ahead 😀
A valient defence from JDK, but I still keep tripping up over the word ‘significant’ .
It depends, as ever, where you pin the description in history. With the benefit of hindsight I do not think that the Skua was one of the most significant combat aircraft of WWII. There are many more suited to that tag. However, at the time of its front line service I think it it was a very significant aircraft indeed, despite its shortcomings, the best we had for the role in any numbers.
Do the Air Shows provide a lucrative income for private owners
They provide some income, but hardly ‘lucrative’ in as much as for most operators its considerably less than their expenditure on keeping the aircraft available to participate.
I would have thought 96 would be a nice number for a Lanc. (Merlin)
Definately – two for each of its 48 cylinders.