dark light

Mark V

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,411 through 1,425 (of 2,768 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Spitfire XVIII TP285 #1318602
    Mark V
    Participant

    The roundel police still has’nt come by to correct the roundel on the Harvard. Witch as you nitice is in mirror view.

    So it is! Oops. You could almost forgive someone outside the Netherlands doing that but…..

    Mark V
    Participant

    she’s an earlier model Spitfire – a converted Mk. III

    My understanding was that BL628 was built as a Mk Vb and later had an arrestor hook added but was not fully converted to Seafire status. These aircraft are generally known as ‘hooked Spitfires’ so she remained a Mk Vb and still is today. Good luck with getting the dosh together to buy her. I have fond memories of working on the restoration of the original surviving components of this aircraft back in the summer of 1989.

    in reply to: Sydenham Spitfire #1318745
    Mark V
    Participant

    Interesting photo, I would think you are correct in your squadron and date suggestion. There is some serious construction work going on in the background there.

    in reply to: Airworthy Spitfires #1319041
    Mark V
    Participant

    how many hurricanes are airworthy?

    LF363 – BBMF, RAF Coningsby, UK.
    PZ865 – BBMF, RAF Coningsby, UK.
    G-BKTH – Sea Hurricane – Shuttleworth Collection, Old Warden, UK.
    G-HURR – Spitfire Ltd, Duxford UK.
    KZ321 – Michael Potter, Canada.
    G-HURI – HAC, Duxford UK.
    RCAF 5667 – Fighter Factory, Virginia Beach, Virginia, USA.
    AE977 – Tom Friedkin, Chino Ca, USA.
    P3351 – Alpine Fighter Collection, Wanaka, NZ.
    Former Mk XII G-ORGI, Ed Russell, Niagra, Canada.
    C-GGAJ – Michael Potter, Canada (grounded pending restoration)
    G-HUPW, R4118 – Mk 1 – Peter Vacher, Didcot ,UK.
    G-KAMM – Flying Heritage Collection, Seattle, USA.
    NX96RW – Lone Star Flight Museum, Texas , USA.

    To answer your second question “How many more will be re-built” is a bit more difficult. Lots hopefully.

    in reply to: Spitfire history ! #1327448
    Mark V
    Participant

    I don’t remember if Charles Church was the original inspiration for this project. Maybe, maybe not. It was certainly conceived at a date very close to his death in July 1989 and built on his estate.Mark

    It was really a post CC project Mark. The pricipal project to be completed immediately after the accident in July 1989 was BL628. The pressure was on for this to be done as there was a contract with Peter Croser to be fulfilled by the CC estate. Once 628 was out of the way (to Thruxton) the two-seat project was born, the first parts started to be made in June 1990 to supplement the bits and pieces we had from the de-conversion of ML417. PL344 was out of the jig by then and so the two projects went on side by side from summer 1990, although the single seater taking priority as it had the funding from the estate, completing the following year.

    in reply to: Spitfire history ! #1327698
    Mark V
    Participant

    Amazing to see that the various Spitfire affectionardo’s don’t wish to air their views !

    I have not read this article David, although if there is a suggestion that the ‘conversion’ took place in the US then the article is incorrect in that respect as it left Hampshire as a complete, but yet to be fitted out, fuselage. The aircraft was obviously completed and fitted out in Florida using wings also manufactured here and it seems they have done a superb job of it too.

    in reply to: Blue Prints/ Production Drawings #1333859
    Mark V
    Participant

    Or you could e-mail the files to one of the established members or a moderater here and I am sure they would upload them for you. I would not imagine there would be any copyright issues on such old and original documents.

    in reply to: Wikipedia clanger in need of correction #1334682
    Mark V
    Participant

    originally for use in US-built Spitfires

    One way to describe the Mustang :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Late Seafire Request Experts Please #1248648
    Mark V
    Participant

    Sounds good to me; I’ll get straight on to making frame 18A, if someone will make frame 8 for me…..

    😀

    in reply to: Spit identification #1249538
    Mark V
    Participant

    I am not an expert but I was just wondering what the main driver was in building MKXVI was over the MKIX LF variant. Shortage of RR engines perhaps?

    I was once told by a wise old sage that the continued production of the Mk XVI was more to do with a surplus, or rather a commitment to purchase American built engines, rather than a lack of the RR built variety. In effect we had a commitment to buy these motors so it was natural to continue to make something to put them in! I have not researched the validity of this statement though.

    in reply to: Spit identification #1249543
    Mark V
    Participant

    I was always under the impression that the exhaust stubs were a slightly differant shape. Is this the case???

    Not a feature that is 100% exclusive to the XVI.

    in reply to: Spit identification #1249548
    Mark V
    Participant

    Ah, the mysteries of the different MKIX/XVI cowlings!

    As in the case of MKVIII MV154/MT928.

    Paul, I was trying to refer to the position of the access panel for the inter-cooler filler as being a feature that will tell you with 100% certainty if a Packard Merlin 266 is ‘under the bonnet’, not the shape of the top cowling as this seems not to be exclusive to this installation.

    in reply to: Spitfire TE184 changes hands #1249563
    Mark V
    Participant

    Joe,

    I understand that the link below details some more recent work by Alan Purdy’s company.

    http://www.deltaweb.co.uk/bbmf/news.html

    The link contains a nice piece of news concerning the re-fitting of authentic exhaust stacks to the BBMF Hurricanes and early Spitfires. PZ865 has had hers fitted and the remainder are to follow next year apparantly. It will certainly be nice to see 350 and 910 with the proper ‘cans’ as the news piece calls them (cannot say I have heard that term used in this context before though)!

    in reply to: Spitfire TE184 changes hands #1250266
    Mark V
    Participant

    According to the CAA website Rob Lamplough’s mark 8 is showing a potential change of ownership in progress

    This could simply be putting it under the banner of a different company but still owned by Robs. The Arial Museum Ltd, the N Weald based company that have neen the ‘owners’ for many years are no longer based there so all this may just be administrative. This would bring the Spitfire in to line with G-BIXL, the P-51, registered under his own name.

    in reply to: Spit identification #1250340
    Mark V
    Participant

    Not sure if it was the website linked below, but I remember reading somewhere that the XVIs had a slight bulge on the upper cowling, and the filler cap access panel relocated.

    This will tell you if a Packard 266 is under the cowlings but, of course, this engine was only exclusive to the Mk XVI during service so will not be of too much assistance today.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,411 through 1,425 (of 2,768 total)