dark light

Ant.H

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,726 through 1,740 (of 2,663 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Fancy a Gnat? #2100131
    Ant.H
    Participant

    As far as I know,G-RORI has never been owned by Dave Roome,although he has flown it on a number of occasions,many of those whilst it was still on charge with the RAF.She’s currently owned by Delta Jets.

    in reply to: FW 189 progess update anyone ? #2100261
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Last I heard the centre section was on the Isle of Wight with Airframe Assemblies for inspection and repair.This was about 6 months ago.

    in reply to: Ron Goodwin #2100276
    Ant.H
    Participant

    To ‘Tally-Ho!’ into the Goodwin Vs Walton debate,I have to say I’m firmly on the Goodwin side.I bought the BofB soundtrack from Amazon a couple of years back and it has the Goodwin score along with the unused Walton stuff.To my mind (or should that be ears?) Walton’s score wasn’t flexible enough and some of the pieces are a little bit too ‘playful’.Goodwin’s music is more ‘punchy’ and dramatic whilst also being pretty catchy and it is also more varied and flexable,enabling it to be used throughout the film.Doing the same with Walton’s music would’ve been a bit repetitive and wouldn’t have had the same impact.
    To my mind,Goodwin’s music is part of what makes the film such a classic,with pieces like the Luftwaffe theme (Aces High) being particular high points,and who can forget the RAF theme cutting in as droves of Hienkels smack into the North Sea?I’m not at all sure that Walton’s music would’ve made that scene as memorable.
    The one piece of Walton’s which I’m glad they kept is ‘Battle in the Air’,the piece played over the top of the final dogfight scenes.
    As I’ve heard it,the makers of the film were going to drop Walton’s music entirely,but Lawrence Olivier (a friend of Walton) threatened to withdraw his involvement in the film if atleast one or two bits of Walton’s were not used.They made a wise choice over which piece to include! 🙂

    in reply to: Sea Vixen update #2100612
    Ant.H
    Participant

    As far as I’m aware,the only accurate yellow noses on the Brietling machines were on the Mustang and the Hungarian marked Buchon,all the others were purely artistic licence.
    On the subject of yellow nosed Corsairs,I’ve heard that the one on TFC’s example is thought also to be incorrect,although it was thought to be accurate when it was applied.

    in reply to: The late great DH.103 #2100643
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Last I heard,the DH Museum at London Colney were working with a chap up in Scotland with the aim of building a static example. I expect Bruce can tell us more…
    Nice pics 🙂

    in reply to: South African Hurricane #2100653
    Ant.H
    Participant

    The plan from Hawker Resorations as I remember it was that they would lengthen the cockpit and squeeze a jump-seat in behind the pilot (the canopy would be four frames long,rather than the usual three).Hurri’s were used by a number of USAAF units in the Med as communications aircraft,and a number of those had a jump seat squeezed in after a certain amount of modification work.Hawker Restorations were planning to do thiers in a similar way,although ofcourse it would have to meet modern safety standards.I don’t remember anything about Persian style two-seaters,but perhaps I missed something…
    IIRC,they were going to use the identity of a Battle of Britain Mk.1 for the two-seater if it was built but I don’t know what’s become of the plan.

    in reply to: Sea Vixen update #2100822
    Ant.H
    Participant

    It’s great news that the sponsorship deal is continuing if you ask me.I can sympathise entirely with Philo’s feelings,but she simply wouldn’t fly (in the UK anyway) without sponsers.
    It would be nice to see her in an RN scheme (who wouldn’t like to see that?) but the day we see her in it will probably also be the day she’s grounded.It’s flying in a ‘tacky and horrid’ paint job or no flying at all-I know which I prefer!
    As it happens,for one reason or another I didn’t get to see the Vixen last season,so haven’t seen her in these new colours,so in a way I’m glad I still have the oppertunity to see for myself.Hell,it’s a SeaVixen,I can’t imagine that I won’t enjoy seeing her fly. 🙂

    in reply to: Spitfire back in service? #2100826
    Ant.H
    Participant

    To go back to the beginning of this thread,it’s great to think the name ‘Spitfire’ has been applied to what might become a very succesful British aircraft,but any comparision with the real thing is daft.The two aircraft are different in size,performance,engine…basicaly everything!Ok,so it looks alot like a Spitfire,and it bears the same name,but it’s not comparable to something like the NAW replicas Shuttleworth fly or anything like that.I think Mike J’s comparison to the three-quarter scale SE.5’s was an appropriate one-it gives an impression of the real thing,but in reality has nothing to do with it.
    As for whether this post belongs on the Historic or GA forum,I don’t really care,but ‘both’ is probably the best answer.

    in reply to: The Purple Plain #2100834
    Ant.H
    Participant

    The Mossies used in Purple Plain were done up in a very similar way to those in 633 Sqn a decade later.The perspex nose caps were overpainted and dummy Browning muzzles were stuck onto the nose.What you get is a split screen Mk.34 or 35 Mossie (with astro-bubble on top of the canopy) which looks superficially like a fighter-bomber version. (Fighter,fighter bomber and trainer versions always had flat screens and never had an astro-bubble.)
    I read somewhere that the aircraft in Purple Plain were only dressed up in this way for a couple of days-they were fully operational aircraft and so there was no time to lose in getting the aerial and airfield scenes done and getting the Mossies back into thier usual configuration.

    in reply to: Name your own Top 10 Aircraft #2100971
    Ant.H
    Participant

    In chronological order…:

    1)The Cayley Gliders
    2)1903 Wright Flyer
    3)Avro 504
    4)Sopwith Pup/Triplane
    5)Handley Page HP.42
    6)DC2 & DC3
    7)Spitfire
    8)Gloster Whittle
    9)DH Comet
    10) Concorde

    If there were more spaces available,I’d also have gone for the SE.5,Camel,Vimy,Comet racer etc etc.So many options and so few spaces!Ugh!:rolleyes:

    in reply to: Has The Growler Growled Her Last? #2101366
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Having done a bit of thinking on this one and following on from the earlier post about a Concorde going to East Fortune,it occurred to me that EF would make a very appropriate home for a Shack.The type served for many a long year from Scottish bases (Kinloss and Lossie) so she would fit right in.If EF were to go ahead with their plans to erect a new hangar,perhaps some thought could be given to displaying Mr.McHenry there,or perhaps the taxiiable machine from Coventry.Just a thought…
    Also,in my earlier post I suggested that 1722 could go to the SAAF Museum but I was overlooking the fact that the museum already have 1721,so what ould happen with ’22?

    in reply to: Concorde (AGAIN!!!) #2101369
    Ant.H
    Participant

    I wouldn’t mind seeing ‘DG go to Brooklands,it was one of the main manufacturing centres for the project afterall.Whilst it’s true that she wouldn’t be undercover if she went there,I would hope that it would inspire the construction of a hangar to house it and other large aircraft in the collection.I know they do a magnificant job of keeping the last complete Vanguard in ground running status,but really it needs a roof over it’s head to garauntee it’s future.Hopefully the inclusion of a Concorde in the collection would go down well when it came to talking to the relevant authorities about planning permission etc.
    If ‘DG can’t be accomodated at Brooklands,then perhaps the Science Museum’s storage site at Wroughton would be the next best place for her?Surely the museum which charts the history of scientific invention and ingenuity (and particularly British invention and ingenuity) should have an example of this amazing machine.
    As for G-BOAA going to EF,I agree with David K that it’s an odd choice,but I suppose we should be grateful that the Museum of Flight are getting one at all!
    What are the plans for G-BOAB?Is she to be displayed within the Terminal (ie undercover) or outside it?

    in reply to: Has The Growler Growled Her Last? #2101473
    Ant.H
    Participant
    in reply to: Shuttleworth Collection #2101711
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Just to add the to brainstorm of possibilities for the future,what about the Masefield Chipmunk which is currently derelict somewhere in Scandenavia?It was a beautiful little machine in it’s day and is associated with one of the greatest names in British aviation.
    Just a suggestion…

    in reply to: Remember summer ? #2102464
    Ant.H
    Participant

    The back seats of both those Mustangs are empty???! Next time that looks like happenning,gimme a call Yak…;) 🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 1,726 through 1,740 (of 2,663 total)