dark light

Ant.H

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 961 through 975 (of 2,663 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Happy Birthday Dove #1379608
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Seconded,good shout Dave. Here’s to many more years of airworthy Doves/Devons…:)
    While we’re on the subject,am I right in thinking there’s still a search going on for the prototype?Does anyone know if they’ve come up with anything?

    in reply to: Spitfire nudity!! #1380774
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Lovely model Starfire,is that the 1:72 Airfix kit?? Thanks for the pic Daz.

    in reply to: Gnat XR537 #1386245
    Ant.H
    Participant

    “The owners of the three red arrow Gnats should start up there own display team and call it Red Arrows 1970’s .

    James”

    There was some talk about forming just such a team two or three years ago,the national newspapers even published one or two articles about the team stating that they would be the ‘only privately funded display team in the UK’,or something of the kind. Dunno what happenned after that,but it seems it came to nought.

    in reply to: Precision bombing #1392594
    Ant.H
    Participant

    The Hiroshima bomb was very precisely aimed at the designated aiming point,the Aioi Bridge and it detonated only 550ft from the aiming point. However,considering the destructive power of the bomb,it can hardly be described as a precision weapon.
    The Nagasaki bomb was not so accurately dropped,cloud cover almost prevented the bombardier on ‘Bockscar’ from dropping the bomb at all,and when it was finally dropped it detonated 2 miles from the aiming point. It fell on an military/industrial area of the city,rather than the crowded residential areas in the centre of town as had been intended,saving countless lives.

    in reply to: Air Show Video Uploaded #1401391
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Thanks Dave,only just got around to viewing the clips. Interesting to see the effect the frame rate has on the props,it’s slightly strange watching the Firefly display with an absolutely static prop!

    in reply to: Mid-Fifties Spitfire & Venom in Hong Kong #1401834
    Ant.H
    Participant

    I can’t dispute it being from 28sqn,but my money is on it being a Vampire and not a Venom. It appears to have straight wings and no wingtip tanks.
    The Spitfire is a Mk.XIX (19),but beyond that I can’t provide any info.

    in reply to: Fighter buried at/near Yeovil???(old Thread 2006) #1409475
    Ant.H
    Participant

    There was a Peregrine on display in the museum at Tangmere a few years ago,would this have been one of the Steve Vizzard engines?

    in reply to: East Fortune 02.09.05 #1410797
    Ant.H
    Participant

    …a few more. Interesting cropped prop on the Spit XVI,and good to see the storage hangar looking warm and dry,as opposed to dripping wet with tarps and plastic sheet draped over everything.

    in reply to: Russian P-47 Thuds #1410997
    Ant.H
    Participant

    I’ve just had a look at the blurb for the P47 in the game “IL2 Forgotten Battles”,and it has this to say about Soviet use of the P47…

    “Some 199 or 200 P47’s (D-10 & D-27) were sent to USSR under Lend Lease. After evaluation of the first aircraft (D-10’s),it was decided to use the type in the high altitude air defence role,particularly of big cities like Moscow and Leningrad.
    They were also used by Baltic and Northern Fleet Naval Aviation as recon aircraft and fast,low-level bombers,primarily due to thier great range compared to Soviet aircraft. In Soviet service the P47 saw limited action,and then only in Naval service.”

    in reply to: My Halifax is finished… #1412285
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Seconded,a wonderfull piece of work. 🙂

    in reply to: End of an era – another historic type goes… #1415055
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Well spotted that man,spelling corrected. I was just testing,honest…;) Thanks for the info,as you’ve probably guessed I haven’t picked up the lastest issues of AM or FP yet.

    in reply to: End of an era – another historic type goes… #1415068
    Ant.H
    Participant

    As others have said,a sad day. I have to say I’m a bit surprised that the version used for conversion and currency training should be retired before the retirement date for the operational version has been finalised. Is there now a fixed retirement date for the Pr.9’s?Last I heard they were on a kind of rolling extension.

    in reply to: Anyone recognise this pilot? #1418707
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Right,I’ve got hold of my copy of ‘Day of the Typhoon’,and yes it is Tim Morice. My info above was slightly erroneous as he wasn’t the commander of a wing,but the Airfield Commander at Le Fresne Camilly,where the Typhoons were based during the summer of ’44. Your picture of him above is reproduced in the book,which is why it rang bells. The caption in the book dates the photo to August 1943.
    His full name was C.S. “Tim” Morice MC,at the time a Wing Commander but he appears to have retired as a Group Captain.
    I can’t find any exact quotes about him at the moment,but I read Day of the Typhoon just a few weeks ago and the general gist is that Morice was extremely well liked and respected,and was considered to be one of the boys despite his not flying on operations. He had been a scout pilot in the RFC in WW1,hence the MC.

    in reply to: Anyone recognise this pilot? #1419295
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Hi Steve,
    I know the face,but I can’t think of the name at the moment. I think he was the CO of 146 Wing (Typhoons) in Normandy,and there are a few pics of him in ‘Day of the Typhoon’ by John Golley. I’m away from home tonight,but I can look him up for you when I get home tomorrow,if someone hasn’t already beaten me to it by then.

    in reply to: XL189 – Black Buck Victor #1424339
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Whilst I agree it was a terrible waste (something to do with the RAF decreeing that thier bases should have only one gate guard),it has to be remembered that the Victor was still in service at the time and that the scrapping of this airframe meant that she could be cannibalised for spares. The Vulcan was ofcourse already out of service,and XM607 was the one that dropped the bombs on Stanley airfield. Looked at this way,thier reasoning seems to make more sense.
    Still a great shame though 🙁

Viewing 15 posts - 961 through 975 (of 2,663 total)